test-bus sounds like it actually tests the bus, which is useful. If
it actually passes now then I'd say we keep it.
Ross
On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 at 18:28, wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2019-04-18 at 09:59 +0800, Changqing Li wrote:
> >
> > On 4/18/19 6:01 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2019-04-17 at
On Thu, 2019-04-18 at 09:59 +0800, Changqing Li wrote:
>
> On 4/18/19 6:01 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > On Wed, 2019-04-17 at 16:38 +0800, changqing...@windriver.com
> > wrote:
> > > From: Changqing Li
> > >
> > > 1. since one bug in run-ptest, testcase test-bus have never been
> > > actually
On 4/18/19 6:01 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Wed, 2019-04-17 at 16:38 +0800, changqing...@windriver.com wrote:
From: Changqing Li
1. since one bug in run-ptest, testcase test-bus have never been
actually run (althrough it's result is PASS).
After commit 0828850, test-bus can actually run
On Wed, 2019-04-17 at 16:38 +0800, changqing...@windriver.com wrote:
> From: Changqing Li
>
> 1. since one bug in run-ptest, testcase test-bus have never been
> actually run (althrough it's result is PASS).
>
> After commit 0828850, test-bus can actually run but it
> did not install:
>
From: Changqing Li
1. since one bug in run-ptest, testcase test-bus have never been
actually run (althrough it's result is PASS).
After commit 0828850, test-bus can actually run but it
did not install:
test-service, test-shell-service, test-segfault, and
dbus-daemon-launch-helper-test
Add
