On Thu, 29 Jul 2021 14:37:28 +0200
"Damian Wrobel" wrote:
> the PSEUDO_MSG_OP is being unconditionally assigned to the msg.type
> before any real usage of the 'msg' structure. So, if I'm not mistaken
> that code was already tested and didn't work well and was reverted
> here[1].
I don't think
On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 22:16:41 +0200 Seebs wrote
> On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 11:36:22 +0200
> "Damian Wrobel" wrote:
>
> > Do I correctly assume that pseudo_client_op() has to be fully
> > reentrant?
>
> No. It's never been even a tiny bit reentrant. We used to do the
> allocate
