On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 09:21:31PM +0100, Burton, Ross wrote:
> On 8 August 2016 at 21:16, George McCollister
> wrote:
>
> > I'm surprised it wasn't accepted when it was a single patch. At this
> > point I don't know what's keeping it from being accepted since I
> > haven't received any feedback.
On 8 August 2016 at 21:16, George McCollister
wrote:
> I'm surprised it wasn't accepted when it was a single patch. At this
> point I don't know what's keeping it from being accepted since I
> haven't received any feedback. I suspect whoever is maintaining OE
> core doesn't have time to look at i
On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 1:05 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 11:37:52AM -0500, George McCollister wrote:
>> Add support for building fitImages that include an initramfs and booting
>> on x86.
>
> I'm in the process of testing this version now.
>
>
> I'm wondering, if bundling
On 8 August 2016 at 19:05, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> The reason I'm bringing this up is because I've been working on this area
> recently and would like to contribute back some code (fixes,
> customizations).
> Since it depends on this patchset, I'm not sure if I should wait for it to
> get
> ac
On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 11:37:52AM -0500, George McCollister wrote:
> Add support for building fitImages that include an initramfs and booting
> on x86.
I'm in the process of testing this version now.
I'm wondering, if bundling everything in a single patchset will delay
acceptance even further?
Add support for building fitImages that include an initramfs and booting
on x86.
* V2
- Include Andrew Bradford's cd to $B patch since it is now required for
do_assemble_fitimage to work
- Fix initramfs support patch to cd to $B in do_assemble_fitimage_initramfs
- Remove ${B} in call to fiti
