On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 19:14:03 Burton, Ross wrote:
> On 27 June 2016 at 18:49, Paul Eggleton
> wrote:
> > Great, that's just broken... any suggestions on what to do about it?
>
> I'm wondering if cmake can be told to just output the "top level"
> percentages, or
On 27 June 2016 at 18:49, Paul Eggleton
wrote:
> Great, that's just broken... any suggestions on what to do about it?
>
I'm wondering if cmake can be told to just output the "top level"
percentages, or whether that is basically unknowable.
Ross
--
On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 17:16:31 Burton, Ross wrote:
> On 23 June 2016 at 13:06, Paul Eggleton
> wrote:
> > cmake outputs percentage complete as part of its compilation process, so
> > we can enable BitBake's new progress scanning for do_compile here.
>
> Some recipes,
On 23 June 2016 at 13:06, Paul Eggleton
wrote:
> cmake outputs percentage complete as part of its compilation process, so
> we can enable BitBake's new progress scanning for do_compile here.
>
Some recipes, such as clang, have something like sub-builds:
[ 0%]
cmake outputs percentage complete as part of its compilation process, so
we can enable BitBake's new progress scanning for do_compile here.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton
---
meta/classes/cmake.bbclass| 1 +