Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v2 02/10] classes/cmake: enable progress for do_compile

2016-07-03 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 19:14:03 Burton, Ross wrote: > On 27 June 2016 at 18:49, Paul Eggleton > wrote: > > Great, that's just broken... any suggestions on what to do about it? > > I'm wondering if cmake can be told to just output the "top level" > percentages, or

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v2 02/10] classes/cmake: enable progress for do_compile

2016-06-27 Thread Burton, Ross
On 27 June 2016 at 18:49, Paul Eggleton wrote: > Great, that's just broken... any suggestions on what to do about it? > I'm wondering if cmake can be told to just output the "top level" percentages, or whether that is basically unknowable. Ross --

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v2 02/10] classes/cmake: enable progress for do_compile

2016-06-27 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 17:16:31 Burton, Ross wrote: > On 23 June 2016 at 13:06, Paul Eggleton > wrote: > > cmake outputs percentage complete as part of its compilation process, so > > we can enable BitBake's new progress scanning for do_compile here. > > Some recipes,

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v2 02/10] classes/cmake: enable progress for do_compile

2016-06-27 Thread Burton, Ross
On 23 June 2016 at 13:06, Paul Eggleton wrote: > cmake outputs percentage complete as part of its compilation process, so > we can enable BitBake's new progress scanning for do_compile here. > Some recipes, such as clang, have something like sub-builds: [ 0%]

[OE-core] [PATCH v2 02/10] classes/cmake: enable progress for do_compile

2016-06-23 Thread Paul Eggleton
cmake outputs percentage complete as part of its compilation process, so we can enable BitBake's new progress scanning for do_compile here. Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton --- meta/classes/cmake.bbclass| 1 +