On Thu, 2013-05-02 at 18:46 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 05:11:28PM +0100, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 2 May 2013 16:39, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
-PV = 0.10+git${SRCPV}
+PV = 0.10+git${SRCREV}
As the git revision is the 0.10 tag, wouldn't it be
Signed-off-by: Jukka Rissanen jukka.rissa...@linux.intel.com
---
meta/recipes-connectivity/neard/neard_0.10.bb | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-connectivity/neard/neard_0.10.bb
b/meta/recipes-connectivity/neard/neard_0.10.bb
index dc43f7e..b9198af
On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 05:56:32PM +0300, Jukka Rissanen wrote:
Signed-off-by: Jukka Rissanen jukka.rissa...@linux.intel.com
---
meta/recipes-connectivity/neard/neard_0.10.bb | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-connectivity/neard/neard_0.10.bb
On 2 May 2013 16:39, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
-PV = 0.10+git${SRCPV}
+PV = 0.10+git${SRCREV}
As the git revision is the 0.10 tag, wouldn't it be clearer to not set
PV as the git revision is a detail of the fetcher - this *is* 0.10.
Ross
On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 05:11:28PM +0100, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 2 May 2013 16:39, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
-PV = 0.10+git${SRCPV}
+PV = 0.10+git${SRCREV}
As the git revision is the 0.10 tag, wouldn't it be clearer to not set
PV as the git revision is a detail of the
