Re: [OE-core] [PATCHv3 10/30] vte: Upgrade to 0.44.1

On Wednesday, June 22, 2016 9:18:10 PM EDT Burton, Ross wrote: > On 22 June 2016 at 19:24, Andreas Müller > > wrote: > > Could we move vte to meta-oe to avoid further world blacklisting? > > This was the agreement in the other thread - Mark was going to restore the

Re: [OE-core] [PATCHv3 10/30] vte: Upgrade to 0.44.1

On 22 June 2016 at 19:24, Andreas Müller wrote: > Could we move vte to meta-oe to avoid further world blacklisting? > This was the agreement in the other thread - Mark was going to restore the old version with a new PN for meta-xfce. Ross --

Re: [OE-core] [PATCHv3 10/30] vte: Upgrade to 0.44.1

On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Jussi Kukkonen wrote: > * License change LGPL 2.0 -> LGPL 2.1+ > * vte-termcap is no more > * API break: current version seems to be parallel installable Could we move vte to meta-oe to avoid further world blacklisting? Andreas --

Re: [OE-core] [PATCHv3 10/30] vte: Upgrade to 0.44.1

On 14 June 2016 at 11:14, Jussi Kukkonen > wrote: > > * License change LGPL 2.0 -> LGPL 2.1+ > * vte-termcap is no more > * API break: current version seems to be parallel installable >with old one, but I did not opt

Re: [OE-core] [PATCHv3 10/30] vte: Upgrade to 0.44.1

On 14 June 2016 at 11:14, Jussi Kukkonen wrote: > * License change LGPL 2.0 -> LGPL 2.1+ > * vte-termcap is no more > * API break: current version seems to be parallel installable > with old one, but I did not opt for that. > * Add patch to avoid stack protection by

[OE-core] [PATCHv3 10/30] vte: Upgrade to 0.44.1

* License change LGPL 2.0 -> LGPL 2.1+ * vte-termcap is no more * API break: current version seems to be parallel installable with old one, but I did not opt for that. * Add patch to avoid stack protection by default * Add SECURITY_NO_PIE_CFLAGS exception until linking failure with