[OE-core] [RFC] One shared state reuse solution

2012-03-30 Thread Chris Larson
Greetings, Over the past day, I've implemented a solution for the shared state reuse issues Mentor has seen with our poky-based product. This solution is similar in concept to what we had in our Mentor Embedded Linux 4 (non-yocto-based) product. This implementation restructures SSTATE_DIR such

Re: [OE-core] [RFC] One shared state reuse solution

2012-03-30 Thread Chris Larson
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Chris Larson clar...@kergoth.com wrote: Over the past day, I've implemented a solution for the shared state reuse issues Mentor has seen with our poky-based product. This solution is similar in concept to what we had in our Mentor Embedded Linux 4

Re: [OE-core] [RFC] One shared state reuse solution

2012-03-30 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 30 mrt. 2012, om 14:54 heeft Chris Larson het volgende geschreven: Greetings, Over the past day, I've implemented a solution for the shared state reuse issues Mentor has seen with our poky-based product. This solution is similar in concept to what we had in our Mentor Embedded Linux 4

Re: [OE-core] [RFC] One shared state reuse solution

2012-03-30 Thread Mark Hatle
(top posting, ya I know...) We've worked on a similar problem in the past. In specific cases we've added a checksum of the host's glibc to the mix. The problem we were solving was in glibc uprevs during the RHEL 4 world.. new APIs would arrive and things would break -- or workaround would

Re: [OE-core] [RFC] One shared state reuse solution

2012-03-30 Thread Chris Larson
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Mark Hatle mark.ha...@windriver.com wrote: We've worked on a similar problem in the past.  In specific cases we've added a checksum of the host's glibc to the mix.  The problem we were solving was in glibc uprevs during the RHEL 4 world.. new APIs would arrive

Re: [OE-core] [RFC] One shared state reuse solution

2012-03-30 Thread Mark Hatle
On 3/30/12 5:09 PM, Chris Larson wrote: On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Mark Hatlemark.ha...@windriver.com wrote: We've worked on a similar problem in the past. In specific cases we've added a checksum of the host's glibc to the mix. The problem we were solving was in glibc uprevs during

Re: [OE-core] [RFC] One shared state reuse solution

2012-03-30 Thread Chris Larson
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Mark Hatle mark.ha...@windriver.com wrote: On 3/30/12 5:09 PM, Chris Larson wrote: On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Mark Hatlemark.ha...@windriver.com  wrote: We've worked on a similar problem in the past.  In specific cases we've added a checksum of the

Re: [OE-core] [RFC] One shared state reuse solution

2012-03-30 Thread Chris Larson
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Koen Kooi k...@dominion.thruhere.net wrote: Op 30 mrt. 2012, om 14:54 heeft Chris Larson het volgende geschreven: Greetings, Over the past day, I've implemented a solution for the shared state reuse issues Mentor has seen with our poky-based product. This

Re: [OE-core] [RFC] One shared state reuse solution

2012-03-30 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 30 mrt. 2012, om 16:23 heeft Chris Larson het volgende geschreven: On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Koen Kooi k...@dominion.thruhere.net wrote: Op 30 mrt. 2012, om 14:54 heeft Chris Larson het volgende geschreven: Greetings, Over the past day, I've implemented a solution for the