Re: [OE-core] [RFC] buildhistory: Record size of installed package not compressed archive

2013-07-04 Thread Saul Wold
On 06/29/2013 06:36 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: * usually it's more important to know how much space will each package take on target device then size of compressed package Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com --- meta/classes/buildhistory.bbclass | 11

Re: [OE-core] [RFC] buildhistory: Record size of installed package not compressed archive

2013-07-04 Thread Martin Jansa
On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 11:53:06PM -0700, Saul Wold wrote: On 06/29/2013 06:36 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: * usually it's more important to know how much space will each package take on target device then size of compressed package Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com ---

Re: [OE-core] [RFC] buildhistory: Record size of installed package not compressed archive

2013-07-01 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 10:36 PM, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com wrote: * usually it's more important to know how much space will each package take on target device then size of compressed package Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com I fully agree; this is a more useful

[OE-core] [RFC] buildhistory: Record size of installed package not compressed archive

2013-06-29 Thread Martin Jansa
* usually it's more important to know how much space will each package take on target device then size of compressed package Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com --- meta/classes/buildhistory.bbclass | 11 scripts/oe-pkgdata-util | 59