Re: [OE-core] [mickledore] glibc: stable 2.37 branch updates.

2023-10-20 Thread Steve Sakoman
On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 1:02 PM Khem Raj wrote: > > > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 5:16 AM Sanjana.Venkatesh via lists.openembedded.org > wrote: >> >> Hi Khem, >> >> We tried increasing the memory and no regression failures were found. >> > > > Thanks for following up > > Steve > > We can cherry

Re: [OE-core] [mickledore] glibc: stable 2.37 branch updates.

2023-10-19 Thread Sanjana.Venkatesh via lists.openembedded.org
Hi Khem, We have checked by raising the memory and no regression failures were found. Here is the test summary; Regression testing is done and below are the test results. Before glibc update Summary of test results: PASS:4727 FAIL:240 XPASS:4 XFAIL:16 UNSUPPORTED:220 After glibc update Summary

Re: [OE-core] [mickledore] glibc: stable 2.37 branch updates.

2023-10-19 Thread Sanjana.Venkatesh via lists.openembedded.org
Hi Khem , We tried increasing the memory and no regression failures were found. Here is the test results: Regression testing is done and below are the test results. Before glibc update Summary of test results: PASS:4727 FAIL:240 XPASS:4 XFAIL:16 UNSUPPORTED:220 After glibc update Summary of

Re: [OE-core] [mickledore] glibc: stable 2.37 branch updates.

2023-10-19 Thread Sanjana.Venkatesh via lists.openembedded.org
Hi Khem, We tried increasing the memory and no regression failures were found. Here is the test results: Regression testing is done and below are the test results. Before glibc update Summary of test results: PASS:4727 FAIL:240 XPASS:4 XFAIL:16 UNSUPPORTED:220 After glibc update Summary of

Re: [OE-core] [mickledore] glibc: stable 2.37 branch updates.

2023-10-19 Thread Khem Raj
On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 5:16 AM Sanjana.Venkatesh via lists.openembedded.org wrote: > Hi Khem, > > We tried increasing the memory and no regression failures were found. > > Thanks for following up Steve We can cherry pick this for mickledore I think now Here is the test results: > >

Re: [OE-core] [mickledore] glibc: stable 2.37 branch updates.

2023-10-19 Thread Sanjana.Venkatesh via lists.openembedded.org
Hi Khem, We tried increasing the memory and no regression failures were found. Here is the test results: Regression testing is done and below are the test results. Before glibc update Summary of test results: PASS:4727 FAIL:240 XPASS:4 XFAIL:16 UNSUPPORTED:220 After glibc update Summary of

Re: [OE-core] [mickledore] glibc: stable 2.37 branch updates.

2023-10-12 Thread Steve Sakoman
On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 4:08 AM Steve Sakoman via lists.openembedded.org wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 8:25 PM Sundeep KOKKONDA via > lists.openembedded.org > wrote: > > > > Yocto bug https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15231 raised > > for failures cases analysis. > > I

Re: [OE-core] [mickledore] glibc: stable 2.37 branch updates.

2023-10-12 Thread Khem Raj
On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 5:14 AM Sanjana V wrote: > Hi Khem, > > Thanks very much for checking the results and your comments. > > >> How much memory does the device under test have? > > We are using the default memory assigned in qemu x86-64. > cat /proc/meminfo > MemTotal:228876 kB > For tests

Re: [OE-core] [mickledore] glibc: stable 2.37 branch updates.

2023-10-12 Thread Steve Sakoman
On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 8:25 PM Sundeep KOKKONDA via lists.openembedded.org wrote: > > Yocto bug https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15231 raised for > failures cases analysis. I assume that I should wait to take this patch until the analysis is done? Steve > >

Re: [OE-core] [mickledore] glibc: stable 2.37 branch updates.

2023-10-12 Thread Sanjana V
Hi Khem, Thanks very much for checking the results and your comments. >> How much memory does the device under test have? We are using the default memory assigned in qemu x86-64. cat /proc/meminfo MemTotal:228876 kB Can you please let us know if we should increase the memory in the image while

Re: [OE-core] [mickledore] glibc: stable 2.37 branch updates.

2023-10-12 Thread Khem Raj
Thanks for the update and reduced list of pass/fails, its really useful. How much memory does the device under test have ? On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 11:19 PM Sanjana V wrote: > > Regression testing is done and below are the test results. > > Before glibc update > Summary of test results: >

Re: [OE-core] [mickledore] glibc: stable 2.37 branch updates.

2023-10-12 Thread Sundeep KOKKONDA via lists.openembedded.org
Yocto bug https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15231 raised for failures cases analysis. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#188985): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/188985 Mute This Topic:

Re: [OE-core] [mickledore] glibc: stable 2.37 branch updates.

2023-10-12 Thread Sanjana V
Regression testing is done and below are the test results. Before glibc update Summary of test results: PASS:4727 FAIL:240 XPASS:4 XFAIL:16 UNSUPPORTED:220 After glibc update Summary of test results: PASS:4729 FAIL:239 XPASS:4 XFAIL:16 UNSUPPORTED:221 These are the newly added test cases PASS:

[OE-core] [mickledore] glibc: stable 2.37 branch updates.

2023-10-05 Thread Shinde, Yash via lists.openembedded.org
From: Yash Shinde b4e23c75ae tunables: Terminate if end of input is reached (CVE-2023-4911) 2dfd8c77b5 i686: Regenerate ulps 94ef701365 Document CVE-2023-4806 and CVE-2023-5156 in NEWS 4473d1b87d Fix leak in getaddrinfo introduced by the fix for CVE-2023-4806 [BZ #30843] 9d5c6e27ed x86: Fix for