On 23 May 2013 03:50, Chris Larson clar...@kergoth.com wrote:
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 3:14 AM, Phil Blundell p...@pbcl.net wrote:
On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 09:47 +0100, Paul Barker wrote:
I've just sent a patch to the yocto@ list to fix this but it's brought
up two things:
1) In
On 16 May 2013 00:02, Paul Barker p...@paulbarker.me.uk wrote:
On 15 May 2013 21:33, Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org
wrote:
(e.g. when I include
meta-raspberrypi, it changes the psplash logo, regardless of whether I'm
building for the pi).
In many ways the bbappend is
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 09:47:39AM +0100, Paul Barker wrote:
On 16 May 2013 00:02, Paul Barker p...@paulbarker.me.uk wrote:
On 15 May 2013 21:33, Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org
wrote:
(e.g. when I include
meta-raspberrypi, it changes the psplash logo, regardless of
On Wednesday 22 May 2013 11:17:38 Martin Jansa wrote:
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 09:47:39AM +0100, Paul Barker wrote:
I've just sent a patch to the yocto@ list to fix this but it's brought
up two things:
1) In openembedded-core/meta/classes/image.bbclass SPLASH is set with
'?='. I'm
On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 09:47 +0100, Paul Barker wrote:
I've just sent a patch to the yocto@ list to fix this but it's brought
up two things:
1) In openembedded-core/meta/classes/image.bbclass SPLASH is set with
'?='. I'm overriding this with '=' in
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 3:14 AM, Phil Blundell p...@pbcl.net wrote:
On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 09:47 +0100, Paul Barker wrote:
I've just sent a patch to the yocto@ list to fix this but it's brought
up two things:
1) In openembedded-core/meta/classes/image.bbclass SPLASH is set with
'?='.
Op 15 mei 2013, om 22:33 heeft Richard Purdie
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org het volgende geschreven:
On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 09:36 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
To avoid things like that in the future I have a few recommendations
I'd like to get feedback on:
In future can we please discuss
Op 15 mei 2013, om 16:44 heeft Paul Eggleton paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com
het volgende geschreven:
Hi Koen,
On Tuesday 14 May 2013 09:36:02 Koen Kooi wrote:
What triggered PR going backwards this time was a BSP removing its netbase
bbappend because it wasn't needed anymore. That's great,
On Thursday 16 May 2013 08:31:33 Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 15 mei 2013, om 16:44 heeft Paul Eggleton paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com
het volgende geschreven:
On Tuesday 14 May 2013 09:36:02 Koen Kooi wrote:
What triggered PR going backwards this time was a BSP removing its
netbase
bbappend
On Thursday 16 May 2013 08:23:35 Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 15 mei 2013, om 22:33 heeft Richard Purdie
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org het volgende geschreven:
On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 09:36 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
2) *Never* use PRINC in type b) bbappends
3) Avoid PRINC in general
Could we
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 09:29:48AM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
On Thursday 16 May 2013 08:31:33 Koen Kooi wrote:
The flip side is that adding BSP layers becomes a lot safer. I don't mind
adding layers. Adding layers is easy.
For distros like Angstrom it is, yes, as I said above.
On Thursday 16 May 2013 10:59:54 Martin Jansa wrote:
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 09:29:48AM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
On Thursday 16 May 2013 08:31:33 Koen Kooi wrote:
Removing layers is pretty much impossible, though.
With PRINC gone would there be any other issue that would make
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 09:37:23AM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
On Thursday 16 May 2013 08:23:35 Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 15 mei 2013, om 22:33 heeft Richard Purdie
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org het volgende geschreven:
On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 09:36 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
2) *Never* use
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 10:10:45AM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
On Thursday 16 May 2013 10:59:54 Martin Jansa wrote:
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 09:29:48AM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
On Thursday 16 May 2013 08:31:33 Koen Kooi wrote:
Removing layers is pretty much impossible, though.
On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 11:29 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 10:10:45AM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
On Thursday 16 May 2013 10:59:54 Martin Jansa wrote:
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 09:29:48AM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
On Thursday 16 May 2013 08:31:33 Koen Kooi wrote:
On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 09:36 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
To avoid things like that in the future I have a few recommendations
I'd like to get feedback on:
In future can we please discuss this on the oe-core list or at least
give a heads up there as this is pretty key to the core of the project
and
On 15 May 2013 21:33, Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
(e.g. when I include
meta-raspberrypi, it changes the psplash logo, regardless of whether I'm
building for the pi).
In many ways the bbappend is too easy and encourages anti-social
behaviour. I would recommend
17 matches
Mail list logo
