On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 11:58:00AM +, g...@git.openembedded.org wrote:
Module: openembedded-core.git
Branch: master
Commit: 3c927c39502061bdf3ef9fba1f0f6e7080f6c3cd
URL:
http://git.openembedded.org/?p=openembedded-core.gita=commit;h=3c927c39502061bdf3ef9fba1f0f6e7080f6c3cd
Author:
On Wed, 2013-01-16 at 15:09 +0100, Martin Jansa wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 11:58:00AM +, g...@git.openembedded.org wrote:
Module: openembedded-core.git
Branch: master
Commit: 3c927c39502061bdf3ef9fba1f0f6e7080f6c3cd
URL:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Tom Zanussi tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
lttng-ust had PE=1, bump PE to fix upgrade path:
Technically, that isn't going to fix the upgrade path. lttng 1.x requires
kernel patches and isn't compatible with lttng 2.x, as far as I'm aware. So
any machine with
On Wed, 2013-01-16 at 08:46 -0700, Chris Larson wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Tom Zanussi tom.zanu...@intel.com
wrote:
lttng-ust had PE=1, bump PE to fix upgrade path:
Technically, that isn't going to fix the upgrade path. lttng 1.x
requires kernel patches and isn't
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Tom Zanussi tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
This is for the userspace tracing part, lttng-ust, which AFAIK doesn't
require any kernel patches.
Yes, but the point was, as far as I know, the newer ust requires the newer
kernel components, and the older requires the
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 11:02:41AM -0700, Chris Larson wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Tom Zanussi tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
This is for the userspace tracing part, lttng-ust, which AFAIK doesn't
require any kernel patches.
Yes, but the point was, as far as I know, the newer
On Wed, 2013-01-16 at 19:47 +0100, Martin Jansa wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 11:02:41AM -0700, Chris Larson wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Tom Zanussi tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
This is for the userspace tracing part, lttng-ust, which AFAIK doesn't
require any kernel
