Re: [OE-core] [oe-core][PATCH 1/1] sysprof: add aarch64 support

2014-09-16 Thread Khem Raj
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Joe Slater jsla...@windriver.com wrote: -+#ifdef __arm__ ++#if defined(__arm__) || defined(__aarch64__) +/* This code defined memory barriers for 32bit, Are you sure it should be same for 64bit as well ? how was this tested ? --

Re: [OE-core] [oe-core][PATCH 1/1] sysprof: add aarch64 support

2014-09-16 Thread Slater, Joseph
-core][PATCH 1/1] sysprof: add aarch64 support On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Joe Slater jsla...@windriver.com wrote: -+#ifdef __arm__ ++#if defined(__arm__) || defined(__aarch64__) +/* This code defined memory barriers for 32bit, Are you sure it should be same for 64bit as well

Re: [OE-core] [oe-core][PATCH 1/1] sysprof: add aarch64 support

2014-09-16 Thread Burton, Ross
On 16 September 2014 20:27, Slater, Joseph joe.sla...@windriver.com wrote: It is not runtime tested. The intent is to allow world builds for aarch64. In that case would it be more suitable to use COMPATIBLE_* to exclude aarch64 until it is tested? Ross --

Re: [OE-core] [oe-core][PATCH 1/1] sysprof: add aarch64 support

2014-09-16 Thread Khem Raj
On Tuesday, September 16, 2014, Burton, Ross ross.bur...@intel.com wrote: On 16 September 2014 20:27, Slater, Joseph joe.sla...@windriver.com javascript:; wrote: It is not runtime tested. The intent is to allow world builds for aarch64. In that case would it be more suitable to use

Re: [OE-core] [oe-core][PATCH 1/1] sysprof: add aarch64 support

2014-09-15 Thread Slater, Joseph
-Original Message- From: Burton, Ross [mailto:ross.bur...@intel.com] Sent: Sunday, September 14, 2014 1:44 PM To: Slater, Joseph Cc: OE-core Subject: Re: [OE-core] [oe-core][PATCH 1/1] sysprof: add aarch64 support On 12 September 2014 22:03, Joe Slater jsla...@windriver.com

Re: [OE-core] [oe-core][PATCH 1/1] sysprof: add aarch64 support

2014-09-15 Thread Burton, Ross
On 15 September 2014 18:20, Slater, Joseph W (Wind River) joe.sla...@windriver.com wrote: On 12 September 2014 22:03, Joe Slater jsla...@windriver.com wrote: +++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/sysprof/files/rmb-arm.patch This patch is missing a signed-off-by and upstream-status. I am not creating

Re: [OE-core] [oe-core][PATCH 1/1] sysprof: add aarch64 support

2014-09-14 Thread Burton, Ross
On 12 September 2014 22:03, Joe Slater jsla...@windriver.com wrote: +++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/sysprof/files/rmb-arm.patch This patch is missing a signed-off-by and upstream-status. Ross -- ___ Openembedded-core mailing list

[OE-core] [oe-core][PATCH 1/1] sysprof: add aarch64 support

2014-09-12 Thread Joe Slater
Enable sysprof compilation for aarch64. Signed-off-by: Joe Slater jsla...@windriver.com --- .../recipes-kernel/sysprof/files/collector_c.patch | 30 meta/recipes-kernel/sysprof/files/rmb-arm.patch|2 +- meta/recipes-kernel/sysprof/sysprof_git.bb |2 + 3