Shouldn't patches like this be sent to the oe-core list? It wouldn't have saved
me from the selinux bug in shadow, though :)
Op 31 mei 2011, om 20:13 heeft Scott Garman het volgende geschreven:
Hi Saul,
This pull request includes everything needed to add the ability to
create custom users
On 05/31/2011 11:45 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Shouldn't patches like this be sent to the oe-core list? It wouldn't have saved
me from the selinux bug in shadow, though :)
Scott,
I would agree with Koen, this is a oe-core change, not a Poky only
change, please resend this request to the oe-core
On 05/31/2011 12:06 PM, Saul Wold wrote:
On 05/31/2011 11:45 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Shouldn't patches like this be sent to the oe-core list? It wouldn't
have saved me from the selinux bug in shadow, though :)
Scott,
I would agree with Koen, this is a oe-core change, not a Poky only
change,
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 19:51, Scott Garman scott.a.gar...@intel.com wrote:
That said, I have no idea what criteria should be used to determine which
list to send things to, and I'm sure I'm not the only one. Is this
documented anywhere?
It seems to me that poky list ought to be not used
On 5/31/11 2:57 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 19:51, Scott Garman scott.a.gar...@intel.com wrote:
That said, I have no idea what criteria should be used to determine which
list to send things to, and I'm sure I'm not the only one. Is this
documented anywhere?
It seems
On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 12:51 -0700, Scott Garman wrote:
On 05/31/2011 12:06 PM, Saul Wold wrote:
On 05/31/2011 11:45 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Shouldn't patches like this be sent to the oe-core list? It wouldn't
have saved me from the selinux bug in shadow, though :)
Scott,
I would agree
On 05/31/2011 02:16 PM, Mark Hatle wrote:
On 5/31/11 2:57 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 19:51, Scott Garmanscott.a.gar...@intel.com wrote:
That said, I have no idea what criteria should be used to determine which
list to send things to, and I'm sure I'm not the only one.
