Re: [OE-core] [poky] RFC: design of network based PR service

2011-05-02 Thread Khem Raj
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 10:28 PM, Lu, Lianhao lianhao...@intel.com wrote: Mark Hatle wrote on 2011-04-29: (adding oe-core back to the list as it got dropped off my previous reply) On 4/28/11 4:04 PM, Joshua Lock wrote: On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 10:19 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote: On 4/28/11 4:22 AM,

Re: [OE-core] [poky] RFC: design of network based PR service

2011-04-28 Thread Koen Kooi
Adding oe-core list to CC: Op 28 apr 2011, om 09:08 heeft Lu, Lianhao het volgende geschreven: Hi Guys, Here is the design of network based PR service, please help to review and give you comment. Thanks a lot! By changing the BB_SIGNATURE_HANDLER from basic to basichash, the task

Re: [OE-core] [poky] RFC: design of network based PR service

2011-04-28 Thread Mark Hatle
(adding oe-core back to the list as it got dropped off my previous reply) On 4/28/11 4:04 PM, Joshua Lock wrote: On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 10:19 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote: On 4/28/11 4:22 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 03:08:03PM +0800, Lu, Lianhao wrote: Hi Guys, Here is the

Re: [OE-core] [poky] RFC: design of network based PR service

2011-04-28 Thread Chris Larson
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Mark Hatle mark.ha...@windriver.com wrote: Checksums and timestamps are not enough to determine a logical progression of the components. We need something that informs the user where these changes fit in the grand scheme of things.  Are they newer or older

Re: [OE-core] [poky] RFC: design of network based PR service

2011-04-28 Thread Lu, Lianhao
Mark Hatle wrote on 2011-04-29: (adding oe-core back to the list as it got dropped off my previous reply) On 4/28/11 4:04 PM, Joshua Lock wrote: On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 10:19 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote: On 4/28/11 4:22 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 03:08:03PM +0800, Lu, Lianhao