On 29 November 2016 at 17:24, Paul Eggleton
wrote:
> How would you get access to that recipe-space information within
> sanity.bbclass though?
>
Yeah good point, that might be "a bit" tricky.
Ross
--
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-co
On Tue, 29 Nov 2016 11:31:44 Burton, Ross wrote:
> On 29 November 2016 at 10:47, Robert P. J. Day
> wrote:
> > one example i mentioned is that the YP guide does not list "sed" as a
> > build host requirement, but "sed-native" is in ASSUME_PROVIDED;
> > however, it's not listed in SANITY_REQUIRED_U
On 29 November 2016 at 10:47, Robert P. J. Day
wrote:
> one example i mentioned is that the YP guide does not list "sed" as a
> build host requirement, but "sed-native" is in ASSUME_PROVIDED;
> however, it's not listed in SANITY_REQUIRED_UTILITIES. that seems
> inconsistent.
>
It would be somewh
On Mon, 28 Nov 2016, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-11-28 at 06:20 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > a bit confused by what i'm seeing in a recent
> > qemuppc/core-image-minimal build on my fedora system regarding which
> > native packages are built, despite what's in bitbake.conf (using
On 28 November 2016 at 13:17, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> I recently ran into a third usage of "file-native": swupd-server links
> against libmagic from file and therefore has a DEPENDS = "file". But
> building swupd-server-native didn't actually build file because of
> ASSUME_PROVIDED and because I ha
On Mon, 2016-11-28 at 14:17 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> I recently ran into a third usage of "file-native": swupd-server
> links against libmagic from file and therefore has a DEPENDS =
> "file". But building swupd-server-native didn't actually build file
> because of ASSUME_PROVIDED and because I
On Mon, 2016-11-28 at 12:04 +, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-11-28 at 06:20 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > a bit confused by what i'm seeing in a recent
> > qemuppc/core-image-minimal build on my fedora system regarding which
> > native packages are built, despite what's in bitbake
On Mon, 2016-11-28 at 06:20 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> a bit confused by what i'm seeing in a recent
> qemuppc/core-image-minimal build on my fedora system regarding which
> native packages are built, despite what's in bitbake.conf (using
> current poky layer checkout).
>
> first, here's
a bit confused by what i'm seeing in a recent
qemuppc/core-image-minimal build on my fedora system regarding which
native packages are built, despite what's in bitbake.conf (using
current poky layer checkout).
first, here's a snippet from bitbake.conf:
ASSUME_PROVIDED = "\
bzip2-native
