On Thursday, December 08, 2011 01:17:37 AM Richard Purdie wrote:
On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 12:23 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:
During the past month there have been a number of updates to OE-core
recipes that triggered parsing errors due to bbappend in other layers.
A small seleciton:
* netbase
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Richard Purdie
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 12:23 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:
During the past month there have been a number of updates to OE-core
recipes that triggered parsing errors due to bbappend in other layers.
A small
On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 12:23 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:
During the past month there have been a number of updates to OE-core
recipes that triggered parsing errors due to bbappend in other layers.
A small seleciton:
* netbase
* libdrm
* xserver-xorg
* clutter
My view is that layer
] Coordinating inter-layer dependencies
On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 14:07 +0100, Martin Jansa wrote:
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 10:59:03AM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 10:37, Richard Purdie
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 13:24 +0100
Ideally a specific revision of a layer should specify on which revision it
depends on/was tested with, so people can reproduce that same setup.
Randomly mixing revisions is a recipe for problems.
Expecting that a layer informs its users that something is changing is
probably not workable. How
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 11:34, Frans Meulenbroeks
fransmeulenbro...@gmail.com wrote:
Ideally a specific revision of a layer should specify on which revision it
depends on/was tested with, so people can reproduce that same setup.
I've been using combo-layer to this to work here at O.S. Systems
and discussions about the oe-core layer
Subject: Re: [OE-core] Coordinating inter-layer dependencies
On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 14:07 +0100, Martin Jansa wrote:
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 10:59:03AM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 10:37, Richard Purdie
richard.pur
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 9:18 AM, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
So if you have some layer adding
layerB: PR .= .b0
and other
layerA: PR .= .a0
and PR appends are evaluated in this order, then you will break upgrade
patch forever if you have to remove layerB for some reason and
From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
[openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] on behalf of Martin Jansa
[martin.ja...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 5:18 PM
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
Subject: Re: [OE-core] Coordinating inter
Hi,
During the past month there have been a number of updates to OE-core recipes
that triggered parsing errors due to bbappend in other layers. A small
seleciton:
* netbase
* libdrm
* xserver-xorg
* clutter
My view is that layer maintainers need to keep an eye on potential breakage and
have
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 12:23:08PM +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:
Hi,
During the past month there have been a number of updates to OE-core recipes
that triggered parsing errors due to bbappend in other layers. A small
seleciton:
* netbase
* libdrm
* xserver-xorg
* clutter
My view is that
On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 10:59 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 10:37, Richard Purdie
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 13:24 +0100, Martin Jansa wrote:
A while back I've proposed to make .bbappend without
corresponding
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 01:02:38PM +, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 10:59 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 10:37, Richard Purdie
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 13:24 +0100, Martin Jansa wrote:
A while
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 6:13 AM, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 01:02:38PM +, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 10:59 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 10:37, Richard Purdie
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
Op 1 dec. 2011, om 14:13 heeft Martin Jansa het volgende geschreven:
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 01:02:38PM +, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 10:59 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 10:37, Richard Purdie
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 04:36:40PM +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 1 dec. 2011, om 14:13 heeft Martin Jansa het volgende geschreven:
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 01:02:38PM +, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 10:59 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 10:37, Richard
Op 1 dec. 2011, om 16:56 heeft Martin Jansa het volgende geschreven:
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 04:36:40PM +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 1 dec. 2011, om 14:13 heeft Martin Jansa het volgende geschreven:
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 01:02:38PM +, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 10:59
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 8:33 AM, Chris Larson clar...@kergoth.com wrote:
This is even worse; you end up with a package without the changes done
on the bbappend and as most bbappend files do not change PR, adding it
later won't force a package update.
People use bbappends without changing
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 5:23 AM, Koen Kooi k...@dominion.thruhere.net wrote:
Hi,
During the past month there have been a number of updates to OE-core recipes
that triggered parsing errors due to bbappend in other layers. A small
seleciton:
* netbase
* libdrm
* xserver-xorg
* clutter
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 12:55 PM, McClintock Matthew-B29882
b29...@freescale.com wrote:
To avoid stressing out RP and Sau! I would strongly urge layer maintainers
to respond to recipe update patches with I have a bbappend, but my review
process needs time, please use the above proposal if you
On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 14:07 +0100, Martin Jansa wrote:
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 10:59:03AM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 10:37, Richard Purdie
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 13:24 +0100, Martin Jansa wrote:
A while back I've
21 matches
Mail list logo
