Re: [OE-core] Library Patches Causing Many Packages to Rebuild

2015-07-10 Thread Burton, Ross
On 10 July 2015 at 00:24, Connor Smith connor.sm...@ni.com wrote: rpm-native appears to be recompiling because the do_populate_sysroot hash is changing for the native versions of openssl and python. I'm not sure why either of these tasks are changing. This is likely the source of a lot of

Re: [OE-core] Library Patches Causing Many Packages to Rebuild

2015-07-10 Thread Connor Smith
On 07/10/2015 04:20 AM, Burton, Ross wrote: On 10 July 2015 at 00:24, Connor Smith connor.sm...@ni.com wrote: rpm-native appears to be recompiling because the do_populate_sysroot hash is changing for the native versions of openssl and python. I'm not sure why either of these

Re: [OE-core] Library Patches Causing Many Packages to Rebuild

2015-07-10 Thread Burton, Ross
On 10 July 2015 at 18:09, Connor Smith connor.sm...@ni.com wrote: Ah, that makes sense. I investigated some more, and the do_package task has a hard-coded dependency on rpm-native. Removing this dependency and rebuilding resolved the issue; the only ipks being rebuilt now are from packages

[OE-core] Library Patches Causing Many Packages to Rebuild

2015-07-09 Thread Connor Smith
Hello, I've been doing research to improve the process of applying security patches to our images. Specifically, I've been looking into why BitBake seems to be rebuilding more than is necessary when a library is patched. For example, applying a patch to openssl causes just under 2000 ipks to be