vice, where FLTK might power
> up the only GUI needed for that particular device.
>
> Regards,
> Cristian Iorga
> YP
> Intel
>
> -Original Message-
> From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
> [mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Beh
PM
To: Richard Purdie
Cc: openembedded-core
Subject: Re: [OE-core] Putting fltk into oe-core (recipes-graphics)
On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 9:02 AM, Richard Purdie
wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-01-30 at 18:46 +, Laszlo Papp wrote:
>> Ping?
>>
>> I asked this a bit more than five mon
On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 9:02 AM, Richard Purdie
wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-01-30 at 18:46 +, Laszlo Papp wrote:
>> Ping?
>>
>> I asked this a bit more than five months ago. Shall I take it as "No"?
>
> The lack of responses does indicate that its not something there is
> strong support for so I don'
On Thu, 2014-01-30 at 18:46 +, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> Ping?
>
> I asked this a bit more than five months ago. Shall I take it as "No"?
The lack of responses does indicate that its not something there is
strong support for so I don't think fltk will be moving, correct.
Cheers,
Richard
___
Ping?
I asked this a bit more than five months ago. Shall I take it as "No"?
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 7:59 AM, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> was this thoroughly discussed before? I think the 'fltk' graphics library is
> quite lightweight. We still use that instead of qt and gtk on limited
> em
Hi all,
was this thoroughly discussed before? I think the 'fltk' graphics library
is quite lightweight. We still use that instead of qt and gtk on limited
embedded platforms simply because it takes 1.2 MB or a bit more rather than
a full blown Qt with 10-12+ MB.
If I understand correctly there we
