19:41
To: Peter Kjellerstedt
Cc: OE Core (openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org); Phil Blundell
Subject: Re: [OE-core] RFC: Maintain backwards compatibility or not for
module-base.bbclass
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 8:58 AM, Peter Kjellerstedt
peter.kjellerst...@axis.com wrote:
Anyway, I
: den 16 januari 2014 22:39
To: Peter Kjellerstedt
Cc: OE Core (openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org)
Subject: Re: [OE-core] RFC: Maintain backwards compatibility or not for
module-base.bbclass
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 14:58 +0100, Peter Kjellerstedt wrote:
So, here I am now. I do not know
Background: Back in September, Richard made a commit to
linux-libc-headers.inc describing why one should not fork the
linux-libc-headers recipe:
http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky/commit/?id=babbf7a46acaefd9b36031483cafce053f607e66
As a result I created a local bbclass for our
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 8:58 AM, Peter Kjellerstedt
peter.kjellerst...@axis.com wrote:
Background: Back in September, Richard made a commit to
linux-libc-headers.inc describing why one should not fork the
linux-libc-headers recipe:
Op 16 jan. 2014, om 14:58 heeft Peter Kjellerstedt
peter.kjellerst...@axis.com het volgende geschreven:
Background: Back in September, Richard made a commit to
linux-libc-headers.inc describing why one should not fork the
linux-libc-headers recipe:
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 14:58 +0100, Peter Kjellerstedt wrote:
So, here I am now. I do not know who else use the
do_make_scripts() function from module-base.bbclass and in what
way, and whether restructuring the functionality into the new
kernel-scripts.bbclass without maintaining backwards
