On 07/31/2013 02:17 AM, Chris Larson wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 7:51 PM, ChenQi qi.c...@windriver.com
mailto:qi.c...@windriver.com wrote:
You can get more information from the bug link below. The related
bugs are listed in the blocks list of this bug.
On 07/31/2013 02:53 AM, Chris Larson wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 7:51 PM, ChenQi qi.c...@windriver.com
mailto:qi.c...@windriver.com wrote:
You can get more information from the bug link below. The related
bugs are listed in the blocks list of this bug.
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 7:51 PM, ChenQi qi.c...@windriver.com wrote:
You can get more information from the bug link below. The related bugs are
listed in the blocks list of this bug.
https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4103
You can also review the patchset for these bugs on
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Chris Larson clar...@kergoth.com wrote:
I've read though this thread carefully, but still can't get a clear
picture about this RFC.
Could you please give me a link to your patchset, if convenient?
This is interesting, I didn't notice this in your branch
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Chris Larson clar...@kergoth.com wrote:
- Next steps, from my perspective:
- We need to agree on a pattern to follow for the read only rootfs
support for individual pieces of recipes, as we need to work through them
individually. Currently we have two
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 7:51 PM, ChenQi qi.c...@windriver.com wrote:
You can get more information from the bug link below. The related bugs are
listed in the blocks list of this bug.
https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4103
You can also review the patchset for these bugs on
On Tuesday 30 July 2013 11:26:58 Chris Larson wrote:
I forgot to mention, we also need to focus on improving the oe-core systemd
support, and the feature parity between sysvinit and systemd images. Some
are missing systemd support at all still (e.g. dropbear's service files are
still in
Greetings all,
I've recently been doing some work at Mentor Graphics on read-only-rootfs,
for our purposes, and have done some things which I think may be of use.
I'm looking for comments/thoughts on the approach and potential use of a
pattern generally, and also wish to discuss the volatiles vs
On Wed, 2013-07-24 at 11:54 -0700, Chris Larson wrote:
- Patched in --sysroot= support for systemd-tmpfiles, to facilitate
running it up front against the filesystem at do_rootfs time the way
read_only_rootfs_hook does with populate-volatiles
How are you handling /run? Is it still a tmpfs
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.brwrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Chris Larson clar...@kergoth.com wrote:
...
The standalone systemd-tmpfiles recipe I've created has a fairly small
set
of dependencies: intltool-native, dbus, libcap. Given this,
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 7:34 PM, Chris Larson clar...@kergoth.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br
wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Chris Larson clar...@kergoth.com wrote:
...
The standalone systemd-tmpfiles recipe I've created has a
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 7:34 PM, Chris Larson clar...@kergoth.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br
wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Chris Larson clar...@kergoth.com wrote:
...
The standalone systemd-tmpfiles recipe I've created has a
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote:
On Wed, 2013-07-24 at 11:54 -0700, Chris Larson wrote:
- Patched in --sysroot= support for systemd-tmpfiles, to facilitate
running it up front against the filesystem at do_rootfs time the way
read_only_rootfs_hook
Hi Chris,
I'm now working on some bugs related to read-only rootfs.
You can get more information from the bug link below. The related bugs
are listed in the blocks list of this bug.
https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4103
You can also review the patchset for these bugs on
14 matches
Mail list logo
