Re: [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2017-11-07

2017-11-12 Thread Khem Raj
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 8:14 AM Martin Jansa wrote: > FYI: You can use PV = "2.0.99+2.1.0-beta3" to make sure that it's sorted > higher than any 2.0.* release and that final 2.1.0 again sorts higher than > this beta3 without PE bump. > There are some packages which

Re: [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2017-11-07

2017-11-09 Thread Martin Jansa
FYI: You can use PV = "2.0.99+2.1.0-beta3" to make sure that it's sorted higher than any 2.0.* release and that final 2.1.0 again sorts higher than this beta3 without PE bump. On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 4:23 PM, akuster808 wrote: > > > On 11/08/2017 11:05 AM, Martin Jansa

Re: [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2017-11-07

2017-11-09 Thread akuster808
On 11/08/2017 11:05 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: > The only change from previous report is slightly newer oe-core and bitbake. > http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Bitbake_World_Status > > == Number of issues - stats == > {| class='wikitable' > !|Date !!colspan='4'|Failed tasks

Re: [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2017-11-07

2017-11-09 Thread Andrea Adami
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 10:43 AM, Andrea Adami wrote: > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 8:05 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: >> The only change from previous report is slightly newer oe-core and bitbake. >> >> >> http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Bitbake_World_Status

Re: [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2017-11-07

2017-11-09 Thread Andrea Adami
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 8:05 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > The only change from previous report is slightly newer oe-core and bitbake. > > > http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Bitbake_World_Status > > == Number of issues - stats == > {| class='wikitable' > !|Date