On 22 March 2017 at 16:32, Richard Purdie <
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Someone needs to file a bug...
>
Found https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8745.
Currently a future enhancement, I think we should reschedule this to 2.4.
Simply bailing shouldn't be that much
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 11:44 AM, Burton, Ross
wrote:
>
> On 22 March 2017 at 14:59, Richard Purdie linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
>> What should happen is that the openstack recipe should complain loudly
>> (error) if anyone tried to build it (or parse
On Wed, 2017-03-22 at 15:44 +, Burton, Ross wrote:
>
> On 22 March 2017 at 14:59, Richard Purdie tion.org> wrote:
> > What should happen is that the openstack recipe should complain
> > loudly
> > (error) if anyone tried to build it (or parse it?) with anything
>
On 22 March 2017 at 14:59, Richard Purdie <
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> What should happen is that the openstack recipe should complain loudly
> (error) if anyone tried to build it (or parse it?) with anything except
> the versions its known to work with.
>
Is this a good time
On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 08:33:17 -0400
Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 8:24 AM, Robert P. J. Day
> wrote:
>
> >
> > proper attributions seem to have been totally lost here ...
> >
> > On Wed, 22 Mar 2017, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> >
On Wed, 2017-03-22 at 08:33 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 8:24 AM, Robert P. J. Day .ca> wrote:
> >
> > proper attributions seem to have been totally lost here ...
> >
> > On Wed, 22 Mar 2017, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Mar 22,
On Wed, 22 Mar 2017, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 8:24 AM, Robert P. J. Day
> wrote:
>
> proper attributions seem to have been totally lost here ...
>
> On Wed, 22 Mar 2017, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 8:24 AM, Robert P. J. Day
wrote:
>
> proper attributions seem to have been totally lost here ...
>
> On Wed, 22 Mar 2017, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 8:02 AM, Burton, Ross
> wrote:
> >
> > On
proper attributions seem to have been totally lost here ...
On Wed, 22 Mar 2017, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 8:02 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
>
> On 22 March 2017 at 11:57, Bruce Ashfield
> wrote:
> So where
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 8:02 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
>
> On 22 March 2017 at 11:57, Bruce Ashfield
> wrote:
>
>> So where are they supposed to be specified ? Surely not a separate distro
>> .conf ? and most
>> certainly not in local.conf ... I've
On 22 March 2017 at 11:57, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> So where are they supposed to be specified ? Surely not a separate distro
> .conf ? and most
> certainly not in local.conf ... I've always been unsure of where the right
> place to specify
> versions like that.
>
If it
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 7:19 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
>
> On 22 March 2017 at 11:14, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
>> so, just to be clear, the simple act of adding that layer to a
>> project's bblayers.conf file will cause those preferred versions to
>>
On 22 March 2017 at 11:14, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> so, just to be clear, the simple act of adding that layer to a
> project's bblayers.conf file will cause those preferred versions to
> be selected, correct?
>
> is that considered good design? in a perfect world, i've
i'm just adding some content to intro OE/YP wiki pages about what
various OE files should contain, and what they shouldn't contain, and
this is the layer.conf file for the meta-openstack layer:
# We have a conf and classes directory, append to BBPATH
BBPATH .= ":${LAYERDIR}"
# We have a
14 matches
Mail list logo