Hi Khem,
On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 12:18 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
I have gcc 4.6 under progress here. As we know the current release is
4.6.0. I have been calling the recipes
to omit the minor release number so the recipes are called
recipes_4.6.bb based on my experiences
with gcc releases over
On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 10:33 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 8:01 AM, Richard Purdie
I think this is just going to confuse people to be honest. I'm happy to
stick to the 4.6.0 naming, then move to 4.6.1 and so forth over time.
People expect to see the .X number else they just
Purdie
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 3:38 PM
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
Subject: Re: [OE-core] gcc 4.6 recipes naming
On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 10:33 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 8:01 AM, Richard Purdie
I think this is just going to confuse people
Hi
I have gcc 4.6 under progress here. As we know the current release is
4.6.0. I have been calling the recipes
to omit the minor release number so the recipes are called
recipes_4.6.bb based on my experiences
with gcc releases over the years.
Since the minor releases are bug fix releases and