Re: [OE-core] gcc 4.6 recipes naming

2011-04-19 Thread Richard Purdie
Hi Khem, On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 12:18 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: I have gcc 4.6 under progress here. As we know the current release is 4.6.0. I have been calling the recipes to omit the minor release number so the recipes are called recipes_4.6.bb based on my experiences with gcc releases over

Re: [OE-core] gcc 4.6 recipes naming

2011-04-19 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 10:33 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 8:01 AM, Richard Purdie I think this is just going to confuse people to be honest. I'm happy to stick to the 4.6.0 naming, then move to 4.6.1 and so forth over time. People expect to see the .X number else they just

Re: [OE-core] gcc 4.6 recipes naming

2011-04-19 Thread Kamble, Nitin A
Purdie Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 3:38 PM To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [OE-core] gcc 4.6 recipes naming On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 10:33 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 8:01 AM, Richard Purdie I think this is just going to confuse people

[OE-core] gcc 4.6 recipes naming

2011-04-18 Thread Khem Raj
Hi I have gcc 4.6 under progress here. As we know the current release is 4.6.0. I have been calling the recipes to omit the minor release number so the recipes are called recipes_4.6.bb based on my experiences with gcc releases over the years. Since the minor releases are bug fix releases and