On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Richard Purdie
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 13:25 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Enrico Scholz
enrico.sch...@sigma-chemnitz.de wrote:
I just noticed that libgcc_s.so.1 is not stripped in the .ipk.
On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 13:25 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Enrico Scholz
enrico.sch...@sigma-chemnitz.de wrote:
I just noticed that libgcc_s.so.1 is not stripped in the .ipk. Is
there any reason to keep the debug symbols? Uncompressed, this makes a
difference
Hi,
I just noticed that libgcc_s.so.1 is not stripped in the .ipk. Is
there any reason to keep the debug symbols? Uncompressed, this makes a
difference of more than 1 MB.
Enrico
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Enrico Scholz
enrico.sch...@sigma-chemnitz.de wrote:
I just noticed that libgcc_s.so.1 is not stripped in the .ipk. Is
there any reason to keep the debug symbols? Uncompressed, this makes a
difference of more than 1 MB.
I dont see a reason to have debug info
