On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 2:12 PM Andreas Müller
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 6:46 PM Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 06:15:40PM +0100, Andreas Müller wrote:
> > >...
> > > Looked into this. Found an old musl build failure of networkmanager
> > > [1] but I think the issue
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 6:46 PM Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 06:15:40PM +0100, Andreas Müller wrote:
> >...
> > Looked into this. Found an old musl build failure of networkmanager
> > [1] but I think the issue has not changed:
> >
> > | In file included from
> >
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 7:03 PM Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 06:36:19PM +0100, Andreas Müller wrote:
> >...
> > Something to add - haven't yet looked into networkmanger:
> >
> > Do we have the chance to change the sequence of paths headers are searched
> > for
> >
> > 1. musl
>
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 10:44:28AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 2:16 PM Adrian Bunk wrote:
>...
> > so that the workaround patches can be dropped from packages like NM?
>
> I think the right approach is to fix the problem where it belongs, and
> generally making changes to
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 06:36:19PM +0100, Andreas Müller wrote:
>...
> Something to add - haven't yet looked into networkmanger:
>
> Do we have the chance to change the sequence of paths headers are searched for
>
> 1. musl
> 2. linux
>
> That might fix some issues
It would not.
The headers
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 06:15:40PM +0100, Andreas Müller wrote:
>...
> Looked into this. Found an old musl build failure of networkmanager
> [1] but I think the issue has not changed:
>
> | In file included from
>
On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 2:16 PM Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 03:18:01PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> >...
> > There are certain design aspects of musl which are actually turning
> > out to be good
> > e.g. there is no __MUSL__ define, so non-portable code can not be
> > hidden which
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 6:15 PM Andreas Müller wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 5:26 PM Andreas Müller
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 5:10 PM Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 04:36:44PM +0100, Andrea Adami wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 11:00 PM
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 5:26 PM Andreas Müller wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 5:10 PM Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 04:36:44PM +0100, Andrea Adami wrote:
> > > On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 11:00 PM Andreas Müller
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 10:53 PM
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 05:31:47PM +0100, Andrea Adami wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 5:10 PM Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 04:36:44PM +0100, Andrea Adami wrote:
> > > On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 11:00 PM Andreas Müller
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 5:10 PM Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 04:36:44PM +0100, Andrea Adami wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 11:00 PM Andreas Müller
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 10:53 PM Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 10:22:15PM
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 5:10 PM Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 04:36:44PM +0100, Andrea Adami wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 11:00 PM Andreas Müller
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 10:53 PM Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 10:22:15PM
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 04:36:44PM +0100, Andrea Adami wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 11:00 PM Andreas Müller
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 10:53 PM Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 10:22:15PM +0100, Andreas Müller wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 10:16
On 3/21/19 8:11 PM, Andreas Müller wrote:
> Just prepared meta-networking/networkmanager update and spent hours to
> get musl patches applied. Have no idea if musl will build and
> currently all my machines are building.
>
> For me - not using musl and looking forward to have a beer with Khem
>
On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 11:00 PM Andreas Müller wrote:
>
> On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 10:53 PM Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 10:22:15PM +0100, Andreas Müller wrote:
> > > On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 10:16 PM Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 03:18:01PM
On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 10:53 PM Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 10:22:15PM +0100, Andreas Müller wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 10:16 PM Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 03:18:01PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> > > >...
> > > > There are certain design
On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 10:22:15PM +0100, Andreas Müller wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 10:16 PM Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 03:18:01PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> > >...
> > > There are certain design aspects of musl which are actually turning
> > > out to be good
> > >
On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 10:16 PM Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 03:18:01PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> >...
> > There are certain design aspects of musl which are actually turning
> > out to be good
> > e.g. there is no __MUSL__ define, so non-portable code can not be
> > hidden
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 03:18:01PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
>...
> There are certain design aspects of musl which are actually turning
> out to be good
> e.g. there is no __MUSL__ define, so non-portable code can not be
> hidden which is a good thing,
>...
Please take a closer look at some of the
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 03:20:19PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 1:03 PM Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 02:11:35AM +0100, Andreas Müller wrote:
> > >...
> > > 3. Change our musl slightly: Many patches we currently have are
> > > trivial. Missing headers or
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 1:03 PM Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 02:11:35AM +0100, Andreas Müller wrote:
> >...
> > 3. Change our musl slightly: Many patches we currently have are
> > trivial. Missing headers or #defines for missing functions... So if we
> > add few headers
> > *
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 6:11 PM Andreas Müller wrote:
>
> Just prepared meta-networking/networkmanager update and spent hours to
> get musl patches applied. Have no idea if musl will build and
> currently all my machines are building.
>
> For me - not using musl and looking forward to have a beer
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 02:11:35AM +0100, Andreas Müller wrote:
>...
> 3. Change our musl slightly: Many patches we currently have are
> trivial. Missing headers or #defines for missing functions... So if we
> add few headers
> * Empty chunks for e.g
>...
> Some other ideas?
Not upstreamable
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 07:53:03AM -0700, akuster808 wrote:
> On 3/21/19 6:11 PM, Andreas Müller wrote:
>...
> > As you might guess I'd prefer 3 because:
> > + Many patches can go and don't need maintenance on upstream refactoring
> > anymore
> > + Burden for people sending patches would be
On 3/21/19 6:11 PM, Andreas Müller wrote:
> Just prepared meta-networking/networkmanager update and spent hours to
> get musl patches applied. Have no idea if musl will build and
> currently all my machines are building.
>
> For me - not using musl and looking forward to have a beer with Khem
>
Just prepared meta-networking/networkmanager update and spent hours to
get musl patches applied. Have no idea if musl will build and
currently all my machines are building.
For me - not using musl and looking forward to have a beer with Khem
explaining me why I should want musl [1] - it is just
26 matches
Mail list logo
