On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 at 19:10, Alexander Kanavin via
lists.openembedded.org
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 at 12:43, Ross Burton wrote:
> > > and adding that depend (or using inherit gobject-introspection) caused
> > > circular dependency
> >
> > Indeed. My branch has a glib-initial to break
On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 at 12:43, Ross Burton wrote:
> > and adding that depend (or using inherit gobject-introspection) caused
> > circular dependency
>
> Indeed. My branch has a glib-initial to break that cycle, but it wasn’t
> quite working right (and upstream were still changing things).
I
On 20 Mar 2024, at 11:25, f_...@t-online.de wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 20 2024 at 11:15:35 AM +00:00:00, Ross Burton
> wrote:
>> Are you testing with gobject-introspection?
>
>
> yes, my test was done with gobject-introspection and I ended up with
>
> | Run-time dependency
On Wed, Mar 20 2024 at 11:15:35 AM +00:00:00, Ross Burton
wrote:
Are you testing with gobject-introspection?
yes, my test was done with gobject-introspection and I ended up with
| Run-time dependency gobject-introspection-1.0 found: NO (tried
pkgconfig)
|
|
Are you testing with gobject-introspection? The API docs don't use gtk-doc
either anymore.
I’ve a WIP branch at poky-contrib:ross/glib280, this upgrade is less than
trivial.
(the branch desperately needs rebasing and squashing somewhat, and G-I is still
utterly broken)
Ross
- drop backport patches
- refresh patches
Bugs fixed:
!3940 tests: Don’t run check-missing-install-tag.py test under valgrind (Philip
Withnall)
!3946 Add missing argument placeholders to several command-line tools (Simon
McVittie)
!3947 docs: Fix a typo in the macros docs page (Philip
