On Thu, 2021-10-14 at 09:46 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 9:45 AM Alexandre Belloni
> wrote:
> >
> > On 14/10/2021 08:38:46-0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 8:32 AM Richard Purdie
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 2021-10-14 at 08:28 -0400,
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 9:45 AM Alexandre Belloni
wrote:
>
> On 14/10/2021 08:38:46-0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 8:32 AM Richard Purdie
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2021-10-14 at 08:28 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 8:10 AM Richard
On 14/10/2021 08:38:46-0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 8:32 AM Richard Purdie
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2021-10-14 at 08:28 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 8:10 AM Richard Purdie
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > We want things to be reproduicble and
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 8:32 AM Richard Purdie
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2021-10-14 at 08:28 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 8:10 AM Richard Purdie
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > We want things to be reproduicble and the variable doesn't really change
> > > much any more. Drop the
On Thu, 2021-10-14 at 08:28 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 8:10 AM Richard Purdie
> wrote:
> >
> > We want things to be reproduicble and the variable doesn't really change
> > much any more. Drop the remaining uses and make those code paths always
> > active.
>
> It
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 8:10 AM Richard Purdie
wrote:
>
> We want things to be reproduicble and the variable doesn't really change
> much any more. Drop the remaining uses and make those code paths always
> active.
It wasn't clear to me from reading the patch. What is the way that
someone would