Re: [OE-core] Adding TARGET_VECTOR

2011-09-30 Thread McClintock Matthew-B29882
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > there is SOC_FAMILY thats used predominantly in TI chips that could be > of interest here. > but in this case I wanted to understand > if it is a feature of FPU or is it a separate unit, still not clear to me. It's all on one SoC/Core. -M _

Re: [OE-core] Adding TARGET_VECTOR

2011-09-30 Thread Khem Raj
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 10:49 AM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote: > On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Khem Raj wrote: >> On 8/25/2011 7:35 AM, Kumar Gala wrote: >>> >>> We have some packages like flac that are aware of vectorization that may >>> or may not exist on a given processor.  I was wond

Re: [OE-core] Adding TARGET_VECTOR

2011-09-30 Thread McClintock Matthew-B29882
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > On 8/25/2011 7:35 AM, Kumar Gala wrote: >> >> We have some packages like flac that are aware of vectorization that may >> or may not exist on a given processor.  I was wondering if adding something >> like TARGET_VECTOR similar to TARGET_FPU made

Re: [OE-core] Adding TARGET_VECTOR

2011-09-30 Thread Khem Raj
On 8/25/2011 7:35 AM, Kumar Gala wrote: We have some packages like flac that are aware of vectorization that may or may not exist on a given processor. I was wondering if adding something like TARGET_VECTOR similar to TARGET_FPU made sense as a way for recipes to decide on how to set various

Re: [OE-core] Adding TARGET_VECTOR

2011-09-02 Thread Kumar Gala
On Aug 25, 2011, at 9:35 AM, Kumar Gala wrote: > We have some packages like flac that are aware of vectorization that may or > may not exist on a given processor. I was wondering if adding something like > TARGET_VECTOR similar to TARGET_FPU made sense as a way for recipes to decide > on how