packages directory has been divided into recipes-*/ dirs
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com
---
meta/conf/layer.conf |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/conf/layer.conf b/meta/conf/layer.conf
index 3f63c7d..ad95405 100644
---
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com
---
meta/classes/metadata_scm.bbclass |5 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/classes/metadata_scm.bbclass
b/meta/classes/metadata_scm.bbclass
index 7112ad5..99ac05c 100644
---
This fixes the problem that I described in
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2011-May/001966.html
Additionally we do not need directories with */packages/* in BBFILES
anymore
use --no-check-certificate for wget otherwise tar downloads from
github.com end up giving
From: Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com
---
meta/conf/bitbake.conf |8
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/conf/bitbake.conf b/meta/conf/bitbake.conf
index fb488ae..030a78b 100644
---
Op 11 mei 2011, om 06:35 heeft Khem Raj het volgende geschreven:
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com
This fixes bitbake bombing out after moving OE-core down in bblayers.conf:
Acked-by: Koen Kooi k...@dominion.thruhere.net
---
meta/classes/metadata_scm.bbclass |5 +
1 files
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:30 PM, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com
well this patch is wrong since it adds --no-check-certificate between
-P and its argument but I have fixed it and pushed the new patch
From: Yu Ke ke...@intel.com
- also remove the libtool.patch since it is already in the release version
- update the LIC_FILES_CHKSUM, the license is not changed, just use
sqlite3.h as more appropriate license file. the original sqlite3.c
is actually not point to license content.
From: Yu Ke ke...@intel.com
- update the license checksum due to SUN/Oracle name changing
- remove the nodolt.patch because it is already in upstream and release
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/commit/?id=a769f4c22a9cfb5ba248c924a66c31ec966bd8a0
- update the patch upstream status
From: Yu Ke ke...@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Yu Ke ke...@intel.com
---
.../distro/include/preferred-xorg-versions.inc |2 +-
...-intel_2.14.0.bb = xf86-video-intel_2.15.0.bb} |6 +++---
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
rename
From: Yu Ke ke...@intel.com
- remove the following patches, since they are already in upstream
xserver-xf86-lite/libdri-xinerama-symbol.patch,
xserver-xf86-lite/drmfix.patch
xserver-xf86-lite/nodolt.patch
xserver-xf86-lite/revert_make_sys_c_use_unaligned_access_functions.patch
- rebase
This fix makes ctypes build for python-native which may be needed by extensions
that utilize ctypes and use setuptools/distutils as their build system.
Tested building pyudev for beagleboard target using Ângstrom distro.
Signed-off-by: Michael Lippautz michael.lippa...@gmail.com
---
On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 22:24 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 08:03:57PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
Martin/Tom: Serious question - why not use the contrib repo for this?
I have nothing against contrib repo and I'm using oe-core-contrib for
oe-core stuff, but I had
On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 16:31 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 10 mei 2011, om 16:00 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
From: Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org
The intent is to allow distros to share common core config but still allow
customisations. The core should
On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 17:58 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 10 mei 2011, om 16:00 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
From: Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org
As discussed, we want to make OE-Core usable with no distro set. This patch
series
makes some big steps
Op 11 mei 2011, om 11:17 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 22:24 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 08:03:57PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
Martin/Tom: Serious question - why not use the contrib repo for this?
I have nothing against contrib
Op 11 mei 2011, om 11:09 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 16:20 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 10 mei 2011, om 16:00 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
From: Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org
These are the minimal defaults to
Op 11 mei 2011, om 11:45 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 17:58 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 10 mei 2011, om 16:00 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
From: Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org
As discussed, we want to make OE-Core
From: Leon Woestenberg l...@sidebranch.com
(Re-)add powerpc-linux-gnuspe support, as from OpenEmbedded.
Pull URL: git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib
Branch: likewise/gnuspe
Browse:
http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=likewise/gnuspe
From: Leon Woestenberg l...@sidebranch.com
Re-add powerpc-linux-gnuspe, from OpenEmbedded. Also adds support
to poky.conf so that minimal-core-image builds with DISTRO=poky,
Signed-off-by: Leon Woestenberg l...@sidebranch.com
---
meta/classes/siteinfo.bbclass |1 +
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 12:13 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 11 mei 2011, om 11:45 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
For the uclibc bits, I'm proposing
to add:
+DEPLOY_DIR_append = -uclibc
+STAGING_DIR_TARGET_append = -uclibc
+STAGING_DIR_HOST_append = -uclibc
On 05/10/2011 09:28 PM, Kamble, Nitin A wrote:
-Original Message-
From: poky-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:poky-
boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Gary Thomas
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2011 5:57 AM
To: Khem Raj
Cc: Poky Project; Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 12:08 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 11 mei 2011, om 11:09 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 16:20 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 10 mei 2011, om 16:00 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
From: Richard Purdie
Op 11 mei 2011, om 13:24 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 12:08 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 11 mei 2011, om 11:09 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 16:20 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 10 mei 2011, om 16:00 heeft Richard
2011/5/10 Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org
On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 16:26 +0200, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
Some minor remarks on the default-distrovars.inc contents:
To quote the email prefacing this patch series:
I did dump a load of default variables into
Hello,
how does the master branch of openembedded-core-contrib relate to the
master branch of openembedded-core?
Is -core-contrib tracking -core 1-to-1?
The reason I ask is that user contribution go into feature branches
(name/feature) of -core-contrib, but should ideally be based against
core
On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 15:00 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
From: Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org
As discussed, we want to make OE-Core usable with no distro set. This patch
series
makes some big steps towards that goal. I'd be interested in feedback on
whether it
does the
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 14:37 +0200, Leon Woestenberg wrote:
how does the master branch of openembedded-core-contrib relate to the
master branch of openembedded-core?
Is -core-contrib tracking -core 1-to-1?
I probably shouldn't have pushed that at all to be honest, its just
likely to get out
On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 17:04 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 16:59, Saul Wold s...@linux.intel.com wrote:
In Richard's email he proposed one or the other be set, why do you need to
set both here? If both need to be set then you don't need the override.
Because they're
On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 14:51 +, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br
---
meta/recipes-devtools/cmake/cmake-native_2.8.3.bb |2 +-
meta/recipes-devtools/cmake/cmake.inc |3 +-
.../cmake/cmake/support-oe-qt4-tools-names.patch
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 10:40 +0200, Michael Lippautz wrote:
This fix makes ctypes build for python-native which may be needed by
extensions
that utilize ctypes and use setuptools/distutils as their build system.
Tested building pyudev for beagleboard target using Ângstrom distro.
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 10:57 +0800, Zhai Edwin wrote:
From: Zhai Edwin edwin.z...@intel.com
Upgrade qemu git to fix bug 1013, and removed some unused files.
Pull URL: git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib.git
Branch: gzhai/fix3
Browse:
On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 19:23 -0700, Nitin A Kamble wrote:
From: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com
Pull URL: git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib.git
Branch: nitin/bugfixes
Browse: http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=nitin/bugfixes
Thanks,
Nitin A Kamble
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Darren Hart dvh...@linux.intel.com wrote:
Between myself and others, there are several outstanding proposals to
modify the pull-request scripts. Patches have been sent, but nothing has
been merged due to a lack of consensus. I thought I would summarize what
I
Hello Richard,
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Richard Purdie
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 14:37 +0200, Leon Woestenberg wrote:
how does the master branch of openembedded-core-contrib relate to the
master branch of openembedded-core?
Is -core-contrib
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 10:01 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Darren Hart dvh...@linux.intel.com wrote:
Thoughts/Comments?
I would suggest to alter the process a bit and get rid of the scripts
completely. Patches are sent to mailing list for review once reviewed
On 05/11/2011 10:40 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 10:01 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Darren Hart dvh...@linux.intel.com wrote:
Thoughts/Comments?
I would suggest to alter the process a bit and get rid of the scripts
completely. Patches are
On 05/11/2011 09:15 AM, Darren Hart wrote:
Between myself and others, there are several outstanding proposals to
modify the pull-request scripts. Patches have been sent, but nothing has
been merged due to a lack of consensus. I thought I would summarize what
I see to be the current weaknesses
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 13:15, Darren Hart dvh...@linux.intel.com wrote:
2) create-pull-request needs to facilitate the use of multiple
repositories (Tom Rini)
Some folks find gitorious or github work best for their use. It is
also reasonable to want to use this script with independent
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 20:01, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote:
On 05/10/2011 12:18 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 15:55, Tom Rini tom_r...@mentor.com wrote:
Add a -l switch that takes an argument of either github or gitorious
and will make the cover letter have a
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Richard Purdie
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 10:01 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Darren Hart dvh...@linux.intel.com wrote:
Thoughts/Comments?
I would suggest to alter the process a bit and get
40 matches
Mail list logo
