Hi Raymond,
On Thu, 06 Oct 2016 02:11:59 Tan, Raymond wrote:
> Greetings, I would like to know if there is any plan / schedule to upgrade
> to openssl 1.1.0 into OE-core?
I am not aware of any discussion about this (and my answer shouldn't be
considered authoritative), however it does look like
This changes the
UNINATIVE_URL =
to a
UNINATIVE_URL ?=
so we can override it in the local.conf file. This matches the form of the
CHECKSUMS and is useful
in the case that you have a special uninative or can't reach
downloads.yoctoproject.org.
-bavery
p.s. The V2 is because my script cut the
The default download site for the uninative tarball is
http://downloads.yoctoproject.org/releases/uninative/. There
are scenarios in which the user may need to force the download to be
somewhere else. This patch allows the UNINATIVE_URL to be set in the
local.conf.
Signed-off-by: bavery
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 12:15 AM, Richard Purdie
wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-10-05 at 22:26 +0200, Ulf Magnusson wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 4:47 AM, Ulf Magnusson
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily
The default download site for the uninative tarball is
http://downloads.yoctoproject.org/releases/uninative/. There
are scenarios in which the user may need to force the download to be
somewhere else. This patch allows the UNINATIVE_URL to be set in the
local.conf.
Signed-off-by: bavery
This changes the
UNINATIVE_URL =
to a
UNINATIVE_URL ?=
so we can override it in the local.conf file. This matches the form of the
CHECKSUMS and is useful
in the case that you have a special uninative or can't reach
downloads.yoctoproject.org.
-bavery
The following changes since commit
Greetings, I would like to know if there is any plan / schedule to upgrade to
openssl 1.1.0 into OE-core?
Thanks!
Raymond Tan
--
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 7:33 PM, Mark Hatle wrote:
> On 10/5/16 9:11 PM, Tan, Raymond wrote:
>> Greetings, I would like to know if there is any plan / schedule to upgrade
>> to openssl 1.1.0 into OE-core?
>
> Currently 1.0.2 is the LTS version of OpenSSL. 1.1.0 is not
On Wed, 2016-10-05 at 22:26 +0200, Ulf Magnusson wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 4:47 AM, Ulf Magnusson
> wrote:
> >
> > This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
> > perceived complexity and cargo culting.
> >
> > Motivating quote below:
> >
> > <
Hi again
On Fri, 09 Sep 2016, "Burton, Ross" wrote:
> On 9 September 2016 at 10:32, Ioan-Adrian Ratiu wrote:
>
>> I cleared the build directory and sstate cache, started with a clean
>> rebuild and I can't reproduce the error anymore. gen-all-unicode
On 2016-10-04 05:41 AM, Ross Burton wrote:
There doesn't appear to be any reason to keep this dependency on ncurses in
attr, so remove it.
This reverts commit 7c474dc3d65bb3f71b375d36d81959cb405be80a.
Might be a a poky commit id?
The right one is:
commit
On 10/5/16 9:11 PM, Tan, Raymond wrote:
> Greetings, I would like to know if there is any plan / schedule to upgrade to
> openssl 1.1.0 into OE-core?
Currently 1.0.2 is the LTS version of OpenSSL. 1.1.0 is not scheduled to be
LTS.
For the upcoming release (soon), I would NOT expect 1.1.0 to
On Tue, 04 Oct 2016 12:22:56 Randy MacLeod wrote:
> On 2016-10-02 03:37 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> >> "native" might be a bit too generic...
> >>
> >> > >> could I suggest oe_native-run or bitbake-native ?
> >> > >>
> >> > >> something that says it's yocto-galaxy specific and can be
> >> > >>
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 5:02 AM, Paul Eggleton
wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Oct 2016 12:22:56 Randy MacLeod wrote:
>> On 2016-10-02 03:37 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
>> >> "native" might be a bit too generic...
>> >>
>> >> > >> could I suggest oe_native-run or bitbake-native ?
On 10/03, Stephano Cetola wrote:
> Chnages since V2:
> moved functionality from sanity to utils
> utilize existing name / email variables
>
> Stephano Cetola (1):
> utils.bbclass: add function to check for git config user
>
> meta/classes/buildhistory.bbclass | 15 ++-
>
Makes it a bit more descriptive and potentially more discoverable. Most
people seemed to prefer an oe- prefix, so let's go with that.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Magnusson
---
scripts/{native => oe-run-native} | 0
1 file changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
rename
On Thu, 06 Oct 2016 05:20:20 Ulf Magnusson wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 5:02 AM, Paul Eggleton
>
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 04 Oct 2016 12:22:56 Randy MacLeod wrote:
> >> On 2016-10-02 03:37 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> >> >> "native" might be a bit too generic...
> >>
Upstream have released a new tarball and removed the old one. Revert to
the Yocto Project source mirror instead, preserving the upstream version
check.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie
diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/pigz/pigz_2.3.3.bb
> === qemuarm (1) ===
> *
> meta-openembedded/meta-filesystems/recipes-support/physfs/physfs_git.bb:do_populate_lic
^ This one was fixed during run - correct?
>
> === qemux86 (2) ===
> *
> meta-browser/recipes-browser/chromium/chromium_52.0.2743.76.bb:do_compile
> *
>
This change aligns disk usage measurements of the eSDK test with the old
build-perf-test.sh script. And thus, also makes the results between the
old and the new script comparable.
Signed-off-by: Markus Lehtonen
---
meta/lib/oeqa/buildperf/base.py | 9
Check that the init script that is going to be called in the prerm()
script really exists. There might be a packaging bug or the script
might've been removed already earlier in prerm().
[YOCTO #10299]
Signed-off-by: Markus Lehtonen
---
== Number of issues - stats ==
{| class='wikitable'
!|Date !!colspan='3'|Failed tasks
!!colspan='6'|Failed depencencies!!|Signatures
!!colspan='12'|QA !!Comment
|-
|| ||qemuarm ||qemux86 ||qemux86_64
On 5 October 2016 at 12:59, Ioan-Adrian Ratiu wrote:
> I think libpcre_%.bbappend in meta-selinux is just missing the following
> line:
>
> ln -sf ${relpath}/${realsofile} ${D}${libdir}/libpcre.so.1
>
> after creating this symlink the build works without problems (previously
From: Wenzong Fan
find-version always assumes that gnupg is beta if autogen.sh is run
out of git-repo. This doesn't work for users whom just take release
tarball and re-run autoconf in their local build dir.
This fixes runtime issue:
$gpg --list-sigs
gpg: NOTE:
From: Wenzong Fan
find-version always assumes that gnupg is beta if autogen.sh is run
out of git-repo. This doesn't work for users whom just take release
tarball and re-run autoconf in their local build dir.
This fixes runtime issue:
$gpg --list-sigs
gpg: NOTE:
On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 03:29:25PM +0200, Andreas Müller wrote:
> > === qemuarm (1) ===
> > *
> > meta-openembedded/meta-filesystems/recipes-support/physfs/physfs_git.bb:do_populate_lic
> ^ This one was fixed during run - correct?
> >
> > === qemux86 (2) ===
> > *
> >
With recent changes to recipeutils, the list of local files returned
by get_recipe_local_files could possibly include source files. This
only happens when the recipe contains a SRC_URI using subdir= to put
files in the source tree. These files should be ignored when
populating the list of local
changed since V3:
added a check for the case where $S = $WORKDIR
fixes [YOCTO #10379]
Stephano Cetola (1):
devtool: modify command fails to ignore source files
scripts/lib/devtool/standard.py | 8 +++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--
2.10.0
--
On 10/5/16 8:57 AM, Jeff Hatch wrote:
> I am seeing an issue where we upgraded the openssl bitbake recipes to build
> and
> install openssl 1.0.2h in a higher layer than the base openembedded layer
> which
> was building openssl 1.0.1m. After this was done, the build of python 2.7.3
> stopped
The PACKAGE_EXCLUDE_COMPLEMENTARY variable can currently only contain
one regular expression. This makes it hard to add to it from different
configuration files and recipes.
Allowing it to contain multiple, whitespace separated regular
expressions should be backwards compatible as it is assumed
The PACKAGE_EXCLUDE_COMPLEMENTARY variable can currently only contain
one regular expression. This makes it hard to add to it from different
configuration files and recipes.
Allowing it to contain multiple, whitespace separated regular
expressions should be backwards compatible as it is assumed
This allows a regular expression specified in
PACKAGE_EXCLUDE_COMPLEMENTARY to have a leading dash. Without this,
the dash was treated by oe-pkgdata-util as the beginning of a command
line argument. E.g., if PACKAGE_EXCLUDE_COMPLEMENTARY = "-foo$", it
resulted in an error like:
ERROR: -1.0-r0
This allows a regular expression specified in
PACKAGE_EXCLUDE_COMPLEMENTARY to have a leading dash. Without this,
the dash was treated by oe-pkgdata-util as the beginning of a command
line argument. E.g., if PACKAGE_EXCLUDE_COMPLEMENTARY = "-foo$", it
resulted in an error like:
ERROR: -1.0-r0
Signed-off-by: Peter Kjellerstedt
---
meta/classes/image.bbclass | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/meta/classes/image.bbclass b/meta/classes/image.bbclass
index 4d5a401..915500a 100644
--- a/meta/classes/image.bbclass
+++
The first patch fix a problem with PACKAGE_EXCLUDE_COMPLEMENTARY where
it could not contain a regular expression that began with a dash, and
the second makes it possible to specify multiple, whitespace separated
regular expressions in PACKAGE_EXCLUDE_COMPLEMENTARY.
PATCH v2: Added two more
Signed-off-by: Peter Kjellerstedt
---
meta/classes/populate_sdk_base.bbclass | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/meta/classes/populate_sdk_base.bbclass
b/meta/classes/populate_sdk_base.bbclass
index a23775e..4462b52 100644
---
On Wed, 05 Oct 2016, "Burton, Ross" wrote:
> On 5 October 2016 at 12:59, Ioan-Adrian Ratiu wrote:
>
>> I think libpcre_%.bbappend in meta-selinux is just missing the following
>> line:
>>
>> ln -sf ${relpath}/${realsofile} ${D}${libdir}/libpcre.so.1
>>
Hello Markus,
On 05.10.2016 16:11, Markus Lehtonen wrote:
> Check that the init script that is going to be called in the prerm()
> script really exists. There might be a packaging bug or the script
> might've been removed already earlier in prerm().
isn't it called prerm in the first place
The first patch fix a problem with PACKAGE_EXCLUDE_COMPLEMENTARY where
it could not contain a regular expression that began with a dash, and
the second makes it possible to specify multiple, whitespace separated
regular expressions in PACKAGE_EXCLUDE_COMPLEMENTARY.
//Peter
The following changes
* otherwise there is a lot of warnings about missing close on file descriptor
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa
---
meta/classes/icecc.bbclass | 14 ++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/classes/icecc.bbclass
On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 4:47 AM, Ulf Magnusson wrote:
> This sets a good example and avoids unnecessarily contributing to
> perceived complexity and cargo culting.
>
> Motivating quote below:
>
> < kergoth> the *original* intent was for the function/task to error via
>
41 matches
Mail list logo