Did you installed Nvidia proprietary driver? Any error mesg from the
runqemu script?
I can't figure out one case that nfs root works and ext3 image doesn't...
Khem Raj wrote:
Hi
I am seeing qemu segfaulting when booting ext3 image. The same rootfs
boots fine over nfs. It does not give any us
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 1:01 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
>
> Op 30 apr 2011, om 00:09 heeft Saul Wold het volgende geschreven:
>
>> On 04/29/2011 03:13 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>> From: Martin Jansa
>>>
>>> * with git-native and rm_work enabled I've noticed git fetcher errors like:
>>> warning: templates
2011/5/2 Gary Thomas :
> I was able to build my kernel (ARM OMAP/3530 based) using this, but
good.
> the USB still doesn't work, so no improvement, sorry.
>
bad. hmm I guess it needs to be debugged. Many times new compilers
unearth coding errors
sometimes compiler mess up too.
_
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 10:28 PM, Lu, Lianhao wrote:
> Mark Hatle wrote on 2011-04-29:
>> (adding oe-core back to the list as it got dropped off my previous reply)
>>
>> On 4/28/11 4:04 PM, Joshua Lock wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 10:19 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
On 4/28/11 4:22 AM, Martin
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 19:21, Khem Raj wrote:
> Did you test this patch on a config where mdev support is disabled ?
> that will be interesting to know
Yes I did. It seems to work fine for me. Do you see any problem with that?
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail:
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 5:06 AM, Gary Thomas wrote:
> It seems that the file
> gcc-4_6-branch-backports/0055-Remove-svn-mergeinfo.patch is empty
> in your tree, so patch didn't create it for me. Should it just be removed
> from the SRC list?
>
good find. Yes it should be. I will remove it and rep
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Otavio Salvador
wrote:
> This changes the packaging only if the configuration used has mdev
> support enabled.
Did you test this patch on a config where mdev support is disabled ?
that will be interesting to know
>
> Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador
> ---
> meta
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 10:31 PM, Bruce Ashfield
wrote:
> On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
>> On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 7:40 PM, Bruce Ashfield
>> wrote:
>>> On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 9:14 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
Hi
I am trying to test this patch
http://uclibc.org
RFC: Recipe based User & Group addition, modification and deletion
Problem:
In OE-Core we need a method for dynamically adding non-standard user and group
entries to the system. This system must be flexible, extensible and easy to use
by the recipe authors. We require this functionality in orde
Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador
---
scripts/oe-setup-builddir |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/scripts/oe-setup-builddir b/scripts/oe-setup-builddir
index 2f8a064..7fefc52 100755
--- a/scripts/oe-setup-builddir
+++ b/scripts/oe-setup-builddir
@@ -60,7 +60,7
Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador
---
meta/conf/local.conf.sample |7 ---
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/conf/local.conf.sample b/meta/conf/local.conf.sample
index ba92df8..02164eb 100644
--- a/meta/conf/local.conf.sample
+++ b/meta/conf/local.conf.sample
Usually only parts of syslinux are used by products and thus syslinux
can be greatly reduced in size. This changes does it as:
- syslinux: syslinux binary
- syslinux-extlinux: extlinux binary
- syslinux-mbr: mbr.bin
- syslinux-chain: chain.c32
- syslinux-pxelinux: pxelinux.0
- syslinux-isoli
This changes the packaging only if the configuration used has mdev
support enabled.
Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador
---
meta/recipes-core/busybox/busybox.inc | 15 ++-
meta/recipes-core/busybox/busybox_1.17.3.bb |4 ++-
meta/recipes-core/busybox/files/mdev|7 +
> > Op 29 apr 2011, om 12:44 heeft Michael Lippautz het volgende
> geschreven:
> >
> >> This fixes compilation/linking of Python 3rd party extensions.
> >>
> >> ${STAGING_LIBDIR}/python/config/Makefile needs the correct
> >> INCDIR and LIBDIR settings to be used in cross compilation for the
> >> ta
On 04/30/2011 04:10 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Gary Thomas wrote:
I got my OMAP target to build with GCC-4.6.0 using the latest
Poky tree after a fresh rebuild. Sadly, the Linux kernel (2.6.37.3)
does not run correc
On 04/30/2011 04:10 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Gary Thomas wrote:
I got my OMAP target to build with GCC-4.6.0 using the latest
Poky tree after a fresh rebuild. Sadly, the Linux kernel (2.6.37.3)
does not run correc
16 matches
Mail list logo