Re: [OE-core] [yocto] [PATCH 1/1] linux-yocto: move non-core machines to meta-yocto

2011-05-06 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Saul Wold wrote: > On 05/06/2011 11:44 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >> >> The machine configuration of the non-core (non-qemu) machines >> has moved to meta-yocto. Moving the branch mappings, compatibility >> and SRCREVs of these machines to meta-yocto should also be >

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] qemu-script: Fix qemu segfault with Nvidia's proprietary driver

2011-05-06 Thread Saul Wold
On 05/06/2011 01:36 AM, Zhai Edwin wrote: From: Zhai Edwin Previsous solution is only giving warnings as different distro has different path of mesa libGL. This patch try to use different path for different distro after looking at /etc/lsb-release per Raj's suggestion. Ubuntu is there, and other

Re: [OE-core] [poky] [PATCH 0/2] GPLv2 tar & cpio recipe fixes

2011-05-06 Thread Saul Wold
On 04/25/2011 05:19 PM, Nitin A Kamble wrote: From: Nitin A Kamble Acked by Scott Garman, who is maintainer of GPLv3 tar& cpio recipes. Pull URL: git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib.git Branch: nitin/misc Browse: http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=nitin/misc Thanks,

Re: [OE-core] [yocto] [PATCH 1/1] linux-yocto: move non-core machines to meta-yocto

2011-05-06 Thread Saul Wold
On 05/06/2011 11:44 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: The machine configuration of the non-core (non-qemu) machines has moved to meta-yocto. Moving the branch mappings, compatibility and SRCREVs of these machines to meta-yocto should also be done. Anyone using meta-yocto to build these machines will see

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] linux-yocto: move non-core machines to meta-yocto

2011-05-06 Thread Bruce Ashfield
The machine configuration of the non-core (non-qemu) machines has moved to meta-yocto. Moving the branch mappings, compatibility and SRCREVs of these machines to meta-yocto should also be done. Anyone using meta-yocto to build these machines will see no impact from this change. Acked-by: Darren H

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] linux-yocto: move non-core machines to meta-yocto

2011-05-06 Thread Bruce Ashfield
The machine configuration of the non-core (non-qemu) machines has moved to meta-yocto. Moving the branch mappings, compatibility and SRCREVs of these machines to meta-yocto should also be done. Anyone using meta-yocto to build these machines will see no impact from this change. Signed-off-by: Bru

Re: [OE-core] [RFC] systemd units packaging

2011-05-06 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 13:06, Koen Kooi wrote: > > Op 6 mei 2011, om 17:36 heeft Otavio Salvador het volgende geschreven: > >> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 11:51, Koen Kooi wrote: >>> So, is having both sets inside ${PN} a dealbreaker? >> >> I think it is not BUT this choice could be a distro choice. >

Re: [OE-core] [RFC] systemd units packaging

2011-05-06 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 6 mei 2011, om 17:36 heeft Otavio Salvador het volgende geschreven: > On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 11:51, Koen Kooi wrote: >> So, is having both sets inside ${PN} a dealbreaker? > > I think it is not BUT this choice could be a distro choice. Everything can be a distro choice, you can make gtk/qt

Re: [OE-core] [RFC] systemd units packaging

2011-05-06 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 11:51, Koen Kooi wrote: > So, is having both sets inside ${PN} a dealbreaker? I think it is not BUT this choice could be a distro choice. So I see as: USE_INIT=(sysv|systemd|both) Being both the default. -- Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems E-mail

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] package.bbclass: convert unpackaged file message from 'info' to 'warn' so that it shows up on the console

2011-05-06 Thread Tom Rini
On 05/06/2011 07:48 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: > Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi > --- > meta/classes/package.bbclass |4 ++-- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/meta/classes/package.bbclass b/meta/classes/package.bbclass > index e6b3df7..082f233 100644 > --- a/meta/class

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] package.bbclass: convert unpackaged file message from 'info' to 'warn' so that it shows up on the console

2011-05-06 Thread Mark Hatle
Acked-by: Mark Hatle On 5/6/11 9:48 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: > Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi > --- > meta/classes/package.bbclass |4 ++-- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/meta/classes/package.bbclass b/meta/classes/package.bbclass > index e6b3df7..082f233 100644

Re: [OE-core] [RFC] systemd units packaging

2011-05-06 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 6 mei 2011, om 16:20 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven: > On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 15:39 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: >> Now onto my issues: >> >> packaging: >> In OE .dev I added FILES_${PN} += "${base_libdir}/systemd" to udev, >> dbus, rsyslog and avahi. This means we end up with bo

[OE-core] [PATCH] package.bbclass: convert unpackaged file message from 'info' to 'warn' so that it shows up on the console

2011-05-06 Thread Koen Kooi
Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi --- meta/classes/package.bbclass |4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/classes/package.bbclass b/meta/classes/package.bbclass index e6b3df7..082f233 100644 --- a/meta/classes/package.bbclass +++ b/meta/classes/package.bbclass @@

Re: [OE-core] [RFC] systemd units packaging

2011-05-06 Thread Martin Jansa
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 04:32:08PM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > > Op 6 mei 2011, om 15:54 heeft Martin Jansa het volgende geschreven: > > > On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 06:51:58AM -0700, Chris Larson wrote: > >> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 6:39 AM, Koen Kooi > >> wrote: > >>> And related to this: how do I g

Re: [OE-core] [RFC] systemd units packaging

2011-05-06 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 6 mei 2011, om 15:54 heeft Martin Jansa het volgende geschreven: > On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 06:51:58AM -0700, Chris Larson wrote: >> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 6:39 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: >>> And related to this: how do I get the "installed but not packaged" output >>> back? The bitbake logging cha

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 37/58] gnu-config-native: add dependency on perl-native

2011-05-06 Thread Tom Rini
On 05/05/2011 03:34 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 22:18 +0800, Cui, Dexuan wrote: >> (Sorry for my delay for the task as I was working on other bugs...) >> Recently I have been looking into it and I've made some commits (the >> top 5 small commits) in >> http://git.pokylinux.org

Re: [OE-core] [RFC] systemd units packaging

2011-05-06 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 15:39 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > Now onto my issues: > > packaging: > In OE .dev I added FILES_${PN} += "${base_libdir}/systemd" to udev, > dbus, rsyslog and avahi. This means we end up with both sysV script > and systemd units. What I would like to have is ${PN}-sysvini

Re: [OE-core] [RFC] systemd units packaging

2011-05-06 Thread Mark Hatle
On 5/6/11 8:39 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: > Hi, > > The past few days I have gotten systemd to work in OE.dev and I have some > questions on how to do in the oe-core universe. First some background: > > Systemd is a /sbin/init replacement using ideas from apples launchd like > socket activation. Star

Re: [OE-core] [RFC] systemd units packaging

2011-05-06 Thread Martin Jansa
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 06:51:58AM -0700, Chris Larson wrote: > On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 6:39 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: > > And related to this: how do I get the "installed but not packaged" output > > back? The bitbake logging changes are hiding it now, which is > > counterproductive. > > Could chang

Re: [OE-core] [RFC] systemd units packaging

2011-05-06 Thread Chris Larson
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 6:39 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: > And related to this: how do I get the "installed but not packaged" output > back? The bitbake logging changes are hiding it now, which is > counterproductive. Could change those messages from info to warnings, then they'd show up. -- Christoph

[OE-core] [RFC] systemd units packaging

2011-05-06 Thread Koen Kooi
Hi, The past few days I have gotten systemd to work in OE.dev and I have some questions on how to do in the oe-core universe. First some background: Systemd is a /sbin/init replacement using ideas from apples launchd like socket activation. Startup scripts are replaced by .ini like files: sshd

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] Add support for remote layering.

2011-05-06 Thread Richard Purdie
Hi Jeremy, Sorry for the delayed response, I took the opportunity to take some vacation for a change and its taken me a few days to catch up on email. Thanks for posting this. Whilst some of what I mention below may sound negative, its not meant this way and what you have gives a nice basis to st

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 37/58] gnu-config-native: add dependency on perl-native

2011-05-06 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 6 mei 2011, om 13:31 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven: > On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 16:52 +0800, Cui, Dexuan wrote: >> Richard Purdie wrote: 3) In gnu-config_20080123.bb's do_install, I don't understand this lines: here the "!=" should be "="? if [ "${BUILD_ARCH}" !=

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 37/58] gnu-config-native: add dependency on perl-native

2011-05-06 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 16:52 +0800, Cui, Dexuan wrote: > Richard Purdie wrote: > >> 3) In gnu-config_20080123.bb's do_install, I don't understand this > >> lines: here the "!=" should be "="? if [ "${BUILD_ARCH}" != > >> "${TARGET_ARCH}" ]; then sed -i -e > >> 's,/usr/bin/env,${bindi

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 37/58] gnu-config-native: add dependency on perl-native

2011-05-06 Thread Cui, Dexuan
Richard Purdie wrote: > On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 22:18 +0800, Cui, Dexuan wrote: >> Recently I have been looking into it and I've made some commits >> .. >> 1) As you said, after we install perl-native into its own directory, >> any recipe not depending on perl-native doesn't see >> ${STAGING_BIN

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] qemu-script: Fix qemu seg fault if install Nvidia proprietary driver.

2011-05-06 Thread Zhai Edwin
From: Zhai Edwin This fix works on Ubuntu, and other distro can add its own path of Mesa's libGL Signed-off-by: Zhai Edwin --- scripts/poky-qemu-internal | 13 +++-- 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/scripts/poky-qemu-internal b/scripts/poky-qemu-interna

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] qemu-script: Fix qemu segfault with Nvidia's proprietary driver

2011-05-06 Thread Zhai Edwin
From: Zhai Edwin Previsous solution is only giving warnings as different distro has different path of mesa libGL. This patch try to use different path for different distro after looking at /etc/lsb-release per Raj's suggestion. Ubuntu is there, and other distro handling can be easily added. Pull