Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/6] connman: Upgrade to version 0.75

2011-06-17 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 17 jun 2011, om 09:08 heeft Xu, Dongxiao het volgende geschreven: I would say put ofono as a DISTRO_FEATURE You don't need to build ofono to have ofono support in connman. Angstrom (and hence meta-oe) build with it enabled by default to support people who want to use the plugin on

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/6] connman: Upgrade to version 0.75

2011-06-17 Thread Xu, Dongxiao
-Original Message- From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org [mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of Khem Raj Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 7:13 AM To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/6] connman:

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] ccache: Integrate ccache-native

2011-06-17 Thread wenzong.fan
From: Wenzong Fan wenzong@windriver.com 1) Add ccache as a native tool, for getting it built automatically make it as the dependency of bzip2; Also, the ccache will be included by SDK images; 2) Set CCACHE on a per recipe basis and add task 'mkccachedir' to create the CCACHE_DIR while start

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] base-passwd: disable problematic login.defs options

2011-06-17 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 16 jun 2011, om 20:50 heeft Scott Garman het volgende geschreven: This resolves the following runtime errors when various shadow-utils binaries are run: configuration error - unknown item 'FAILLOG_ENAB' (notify administrator) configuration error - unknown item 'LASTLOG_ENAB' (notify

Re: [OE-core] eglibc testing?

2011-06-17 Thread Phil Blundell
On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 11:25 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 11:13 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: The thing about nfs is that it's awkward to set up in an automated way. The qemu scripts in OE-Core use usermode NFS by default for booting qemu images... Yeah, indeed, and I

[OE-core] call for participation on openembedded-users mailing list

2011-06-17 Thread Khem Raj
Fellow Devs We have a mailing list for OE users and of late there has been new users trying to use OE posting questions and calling for help there as developers of OE we are also users by default and it would immensely help the new users from experiences of folks. I would request that we try

Re: [OE-core] call for participation on openembedded-users mailing list

2011-06-17 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 17 jun 2011, om 16:26 heeft Khem Raj het volgende geschreven: Fellow Devs We have a mailing list for OE users and of late there has been new users trying to use OE posting questions and calling for help there as developers of OE we are also users by default and it would immensely help

Re: [OE-core] call for participation on openembedded-users mailing list

2011-06-17 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Friday 17 June 2011 15:28:56 Koen Kooi wrote: So let's really close that list and discuss things on oe-devel and oe-core ml I'm on the oe-users mailing list and occasionally help people out, but I have to agree with Koen here. It hardly gets any traffic and the nature of OE is that every

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/9] oe.classutils: add module

2011-06-17 Thread Otavio Salvador
From: Chris Larson chris_lar...@mentor.com This adds a ClassRegistry utility metaclass, as maintaining a class registry is a fairly common thing to do. Signed-off-by: Chris Larson chris_lar...@mentor.com Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br --- meta/lib/oe/classutils.py | 24

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/9] Rework how the devshell functions

2011-06-17 Thread Otavio Salvador
From: Chris Larson chris_lar...@mentor.com In the new implementation, each known terminal is defined as a class in oe.terminal, as a subclass of bb.process.Popen. terminal.bbclass wraps this functionality, providing the metadata pieces. It obeys the OE_TERMINAL variable, which is a 'choice'

[OE-core] [PATCH 4/9] cmake.bbclass: use CPPFLAGS and CXXFLAGS

2011-06-17 Thread Otavio Salvador
Some classes, as for example nativesdk, defines CPPFLAGS and CXXFLAGS to be passed to compiler. Using those makes more sense and avoid some hacks on packages using CMake. Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br --- meta/classes/cmake.bbclass |8 1 files changed, 4

[OE-core] [PATCH 3/9] oe.terminal: improve how we spawn screen

2011-06-17 Thread Otavio Salvador
From: Chris Larson chris_lar...@mentor.com - Name the screen session 'devshell', to avoid confusion if running bitbake itself under a screen session. - Display a warning message when spawning screen, so it's clear to the user that screen has been run (otherwise do_devshell just appears to

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/9] Patches pending on O.S. Systems tree

2011-06-17 Thread Otavio Salvador
The following changes since commit 835d817f1ba7b99167743fdb86ba80f3a07bd82d: systemtap: remove non-core COMPATIBLE_MACHINES (2011-06-16 22:12:40 +0100) are available in the git repository at: git://github.com/OSSystems/oe-core master https://github.com/OSSystems/oe-core/tree/master Chris

[OE-core] [PATCH 6/9] lib_package.bbclass: move static libraries to ${PN}-staticdev

2011-06-17 Thread Otavio Salvador
Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br --- meta/classes/lib_package.bbclass |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/classes/lib_package.bbclass b/meta/classes/lib_package.bbclass index 82c9370..5ce8727 100644 ---

Re: [OE-core] call for participation on openembedded-users mailing list

2011-06-17 Thread Khem Raj
On 06/17/2011 07:37 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Friday 17 June 2011 15:28:56 Koen Kooi wrote: So let's really close that list and discuss things on oe-devel and oe-core ml I'm on the oe-users mailing list and occasionally help people out, but I have to agree with Koen here. It hardly gets any

Re: [OE-core] Question about apply eglibc configurability to create minimal image

2011-06-17 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 17 jun 2011, om 17:46 heeft Mark Hatle het volgende geschreven: On 6/17/11 5:05 AM, Kang Kai wrote: On 2011年06月09日 23:20, Mark Hatle wrote: On 6/9/11 5:57 AM, Kang Kai wrote: Hi Mark, I am focus on eglibc itself compilation with disabling all the configurable options, right now

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] base-passwd: disable problematic login.defs options

2011-06-17 Thread Scott Garman
On 06/17/2011 09:43 AM, Khem Raj wrote: On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Scott Garmanscott.a.gar...@intel.com wrote: On 06/16/2011 04:54 PM, Khem Raj wrote: On 06/16/2011 11:50 AM, Scott Garman wrote: This resolves the following runtime errors when various shadow-utils binaries are run:

Re: [OE-core] call for participation on openembedded-users mailing list

2011-06-17 Thread Philip Balister
On 06/17/2011 08:41 AM, Khem Raj wrote: On 06/17/2011 07:37 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Friday 17 June 2011 15:28:56 Koen Kooi wrote: So let's really close that list and discuss things on oe-devel and oe-core ml I'm on the oe-users mailing list and occasionally help people out, but I have to

Re: [OE-core] call for participation on openembedded-users mailing list

2011-06-17 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 17:31, Philip Balister phi...@balister.org wrote: ... We should look at all the OE/Yocto lists and make sure we consolidate lists as things evolve to reduce the number of lists we need to monitor. May I suggest we to revisit the oe-core mailing list need? On the

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] RFC - combo layer repo tool

2011-06-17 Thread Paul Eggleton
Hi Ke, Great work. Here's my review so far: On Monday 13 June 2011 14:15:04 Yu, Ke wrote: --- /dev/null +++ b/scripts/combo-layer-hook-default.sh @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ +#!/bin/sh +# Take a patch from bitbake and apply to poky This text should be a bit more generic. Maybe Hook to add source

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] base-passwd: disable problematic login.defs options

2011-06-17 Thread Scott Garman
On 06/17/2011 10:22 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote: On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 17:19, Scott Garmanscott.a.gar...@intel.com wrote: Sorry, I forgot to mention that shadow-utils-native is what is used to modify the passwd/group files in the target sysroot. It seems that having a -native recipe install

Re: [OE-core] [RFC] qemu* kernel configs

2011-06-17 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Koen Kooi k...@dominion.thruhere.net wrote: Op 13 jun 2011, om 15:57 heeft Bruce Ashfield het volgende geschreven: On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Koen Kooi k...@dominion.thruhere.net wrote: Op 13 jun 2011, om 14:54 heeft Bruce Ashfield het volgende

[OE-core] [RFC PATCH 0/2] Sanity testing network connectivity

2011-06-17 Thread Joshua Lock
In response to a Yocto Bugzilla request[1] I've written a sanity test to check whether BitBake is able to fecth from http, https and git sources. The idea being that if the user is behing a proxy and this test fails we can more easily help them diagnose and fix their problem. I've built on the

[OE-core] [RFC PATCH 2/2] sanity: implement network connectivity test

2011-06-17 Thread Joshua Lock
Sanity test to verify files can be fetched from the network using git, http and https fetchers point users at a page to help get set up in the case of a failure Addresses [YOCTO #933] Signed-off-by: Joshua Lock j...@linux.intel.com --- meta/classes/sanity.bbclass | 29

[OE-core] [RFC PATCH 1/2] sanity.bbclass: pass the data object to the less frequent test harnesses

2011-06-17 Thread Joshua Lock
By passing the data object to the less frequently run test harnesses (check_sanity_tmpdir_change(), check_sanity_sstate_dir_change() and check_sanity_version_change()) we can run tests against BitBake data here too. Signed-off-by: Joshua Lock j...@linux.intel.com --- meta/classes/sanity.bbclass