[OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] useradd.bbclass: new class for managing user/group permissions [v3]

2011-07-01 Thread Scott Garman
Hi, This pull request should be complete based on Richard's second round of feedback. Thanks, Scott The following changes since commit 1c1372e7eccb01f7c1f682bc0aa989c37f2516f6: bitbake.conf: update PSEUDO_PASSWD variable (2011-07-01 00:13:25 +0100) are available in the git repository at:

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] qemu.inc: append to IMAGE_FSTYPES instead of weakly assigning them

2011-07-01 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 1 jul 2011, om 01:09 heeft Saul Wold het volgende geschreven: On 06/30/2011 03:33 PM, Koen Kooi wrote: ping I believe that this has been discussed elsewhere. Let's post the outcome here then, since I still want this patch to go in. Sau! Op 12 jun 2011, om 18:26 heeft Koen Kooi

[OE-core] Updated [PATCH 0/4] SRC_URI Check Updates with Beagleboard updates

2011-07-01 Thread Saul Wold
Richard, This address 2 bugs filed by Darren for the Beagleboard, they build correctly. It also updates two recipes that Mark Hatle found lacking checksums. Thanks Sau! The following changes since commit 40ecaf6a59ba61e72d29d7e677197ef37c998408: uclibc: Add default uClibc.machine

[OE-core] [PATCH 3/4] mpeg2dec: add SRC_URI Checksum

2011-07-01 Thread Saul Wold
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold s...@linux.intel.com --- meta/recipes-multimedia/mpeg2dec/mpeg2dec_0.4.1.bb |3 +++ 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-multimedia/mpeg2dec/mpeg2dec_0.4.1.bb b/meta/recipes-multimedia/mpeg2dec/mpeg2dec_0.4.1.bb index

[OE-core] [PATCH 4/4] libmad: add SRC_URI Checksum

2011-07-01 Thread Saul Wold
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold s...@linux.intel.com --- meta/recipes-multimedia/libmad/libmad_0.15.1b.bb |3 +++ 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-multimedia/libmad/libmad_0.15.1b.bb b/meta/recipes-multimedia/libmad/libmad_0.15.1b.bb index acc9df5..ed3efa5

[OE-core] [PATCH v4 1/8] Remove support for building 2.4 kernels

2011-07-01 Thread Anders Darander
Signed-off-by: Anders Darander and...@chargestorm.se --- meta/classes/kernel.bbclass | 12 ++-- meta/classes/module-base.bbclass |2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass b/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass index

[OE-core] [PATCH v4 6/8] modutils: remove modutils

2011-07-01 Thread Anders Darander
As 2.4 support is being phased out, remove modutils. Signed-off-by: Anders Darander and...@chargestorm.se --- meta/recipes-kernel/modutils/files/armeb.patch | 16 meta/recipes-kernel/modutils/files/configure.patch | 34 --- meta/recipes-kernel/modutils/files/gcc4.patch |

[OE-core] [PATCH v4 5/8] modutils-initscripts: move recipe prior to modutils removal

2011-07-01 Thread Anders Darander
Signed-off-by: Anders Darander and...@chargestorm.se --- .../{modutils = module-init-tools}/files/PD.patch |0 .../files/modutils.sh |0 .../modutils-initscripts.bb|0 3 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) rename

[OE-core] [PATCH v4 4/8] kernel.bblass: remove get_kernelmajorversion

2011-07-01 Thread Anders Darander
It is now unused. Signed-off-by: Anders Darander and...@chargestorm.se --- meta/classes/linux-kernel-base.bbclass |8 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/classes/linux-kernel-base.bbclass b/meta/classes/linux-kernel-base.bbclass index

[OE-core] [PATCH v4 7/8] task-base: remove modutils reference.

2011-07-01 Thread Anders Darander
Also remove the other kernel24 references. Make everything dependent on kernel26 default. Signed-off-by: Anders Darander and...@chargestorm.se --- meta/recipes-core/tasks/task-base.bb | 24 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) diff --git

[OE-core] [PATCH v4 3/8] modules-init-tools(-cross): update to 3.16

2011-07-01 Thread Anders Darander
Update to get support for Linux 3.0. Delete the ignore_arch_directory.patch (as it does not apply to 3.16). Signed-off-by: Anders Darander and...@chargestorm.se --- .../files/ignore_arch_directory.patch | 30 ...oss_3.12.bb = module-init-tools-cross_3.16.bb} |

[OE-core] [PATCH v4 8/8] distro_tracking_fields: remove modutils.

2011-07-01 Thread Anders Darander
Signed-off-by: Anders Darander and...@chargestorm.se --- .../conf/distro/include/distro_tracking_fields.inc |8 +--- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/conf/distro/include/distro_tracking_fields.inc b/meta/conf/distro/include/distro_tracking_fields.inc

[OE-core] It's broken, please revert. Re: [PATCH 0/4 V4] Share gcc work directories

2011-07-01 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 1 jul 2011, om 01:26 heeft Saul Wold het volgende geschreven: On 06/28/2011 02:05 AM, Robert Yang wrote: Changes of V4: * Change the definition of GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER as Richard suggested. e.g., the entries in the files that look like: #define GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER64

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/4] uboot: Update to 2011.06

2011-07-01 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 1 jul 2011, om 08:54 heeft Saul Wold het volgende geschreven: [YOCTO #1198] Signed-off-by: Saul Wold s...@linux.intel.com --- ...Drop-config.h-include-in-tools-imximage.h.patch |0 ...ove-LDSCRIPT-processing-to-the-top-level-.patch |0 ...kimage_2011.03.bb =

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v4 7/8] task-base: remove modutils reference.

2011-07-01 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 1 jul 2011, om 09:06 heeft Anders Darander het volgende geschreven: Also remove the other kernel24 references. Make everything dependent on kernel26 default. Since there will be only one of each, can we just completely scrap there variables and put the items directly in the tasks?

Re: [OE-core] It's broken, please revert. Re: [PATCH 0/4 V4] Share gcc work directories

2011-07-01 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 09:15 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: Op 1 jul 2011, om 01:26 heeft Saul Wold het volgende geschreven: On 06/28/2011 02:05 AM, Robert Yang wrote: Changes of V4: * Change the definition of GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER as Richard suggested. e.g., the entries in the files

Re: [OE-core] It's broken, please revert. Re: [PATCH 0/4 V4] Share gcc work directories

2011-07-01 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 09:15 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: incremental build with rm_work turned on: ERROR: Function 'do_configure' failed (see /OE/tentacle/build/tmp-angstrom_2010_x-eglibc/work/armv7a-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/gcc-cross-initial-4.5-r37.0+svnr175127/temp/log.do_configure.27092 for

Re: [OE-core] Proposal: recipe feature switches

2011-07-01 Thread Frans Meulenbroeks
2011/7/1 Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 18:10 +0100, Chris Elston wrote: We're looking to base an embedded development on oe-core in the near future, and one of the things we must have is the ability to configure features in/out of recipes per

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] Add support for BAD_RECOMMENDATIONS to rootfs_ipk

2011-07-01 Thread Chris Elston
On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 16:13 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: On 06/30/2011 04:10 AM, Chris Elston wrote: As discussed on IRC on 30/06/11, this patch adds support for BAD_RECOMMENDATIONS to rootfs_ipk, which is a list of packages NOT to install if suggested or recommended by a recipe. Taken from

Re: [OE-core] It's broken, please revert. Re: [PATCH 0/4 V4] Share gcc work directories

2011-07-01 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 1 jul 2011, om 10:10 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven: On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 09:15 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: Op 1 jul 2011, om 01:26 heeft Saul Wold het volgende geschreven: On 06/28/2011 02:05 AM, Robert Yang wrote: Changes of V4: * Change the definition of

Re: [OE-core] Proposal: recipe feature switches

2011-07-01 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 1 jul 2011, om 10:55 heeft Frans Meulenbroeks het volgende geschreven: 2011/7/1 Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 18:10 +0100, Chris Elston wrote: We're looking to base an embedded development on oe-core in the near future, and one of the things

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] Add support for BAD_RECOMMENDATIONS to rootfs_ipk

2011-07-01 Thread Phil Blundell
On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 10:06 +0100, Chris Elston wrote: + STATUS=${IMAGE_ROOTFS}/var/lib/opkg/status Please make that use ${opkglibdir} like the rest of the class does. Otherwise this patch looks pretty good to me. p. ___ Openembedded-core

Re: [OE-core] Proposal: recipe feature switches

2011-07-01 Thread Frans Meulenbroeks
2011/7/1 Koen Kooi k...@dominion.thruhere.net Op 1 jul 2011, om 10:55 heeft Frans Meulenbroeks het volgende geschreven: Good idea. Personally I'd like to also bring footprint into the equation. If a feature drags in lots of additional packages, it is interesting to make it

Re: [OE-core] Proposal: recipe feature switches

2011-07-01 Thread Frans Meulenbroeks
Oh by the way, and the message you might be see saying: This message may not have been sent by: fransmeulenbro...@gmail.com Learn more Report phishing This is really google not having their stuff properly configured. I'm sending email from their web client (https://mail.google.com/) And yes,

Re: [OE-core] cairo: Clean up packaging and fix warnings

2011-07-01 Thread Phil Blundell
On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 10:15 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: +PACKAGES =+ libcairo-gobject2 libcairo-script-interpreter2 cairo-perf-utils I guess those can/should just be libcairo-gobject and libcairo-script-interpreter now as well. SUMMARY_libcairo2 = The Cairo 2D vector graphics library

[OE-core] PRIORITY

2011-07-01 Thread Phil Blundell
We had some discussion of this a few weeks ago but I'm not sure it ever reached a firm conclusion. Is everyone agreed that the PRIORITY variable does not serve any useful purpose in oe-core and can/should be removed from the recipes? p. ___

Re: [OE-core] Proposal: recipe feature switches

2011-07-01 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 1 jul 2011, om 11:26 heeft Frans Meulenbroeks het volgende geschreven: 2011/7/1 Koen Kooi k...@dominion.thruhere.net Op 1 jul 2011, om 10:55 heeft Frans Meulenbroeks het volgende geschreven: Good idea. Personally I'd like to also bring footprint into the equation. If a feature

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] uclibc: Add support for execvpe and update scheduler functions

2011-07-01 Thread Phil Blundell
On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 22:24 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: Enable utmpx These changes are required for systemd to work Can we make those be DISTRO_LIBC_FEATURES? p. ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] busybox: bump PR to enable largefile support

2011-07-01 Thread Dexuan Cui
The following changes since commit 4d60d32a60ae0fae1002b27cd7d20c28532f4932: poky.conf: add largefile support into DISTRO_FEATURES (2011-07-01 17:35:26 +0800) Dexuan Cui (1): busybox: bump PR to enable largefile support are available in the git repository at:

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] busybox: bump PR to enable largefile support

2011-07-01 Thread Dexuan Cui
[YOCTO #1205 ] In the previous commit we enable largefile setting in meta-yocto/conf/distro/poky.conf, so we need to re-build busybox to actually enable it. Signed-off-by: Dexuan Cui dexuan@intel.com --- meta/recipes-core/busybox/busybox_1.18.4.bb |2 +- 1 files changed, 1

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] busybox: bump PR to enable largefile support

2011-07-01 Thread Cui, Dexuan
Cui, Dexuan wrote: The following changes since commit 4d60d32a60ae0fae1002b27cd7d20c28532f4932: poky.conf: add largefile support into DISTRO_FEATURES (2011-07-01 17:35:26 +0800) Dexuan Cui (1): busybox: bump PR to enable largefile support are available in the git repository at:

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] busybox: bump PR to enable largefile support

2011-07-01 Thread Phil Blundell
On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 17:53 +0800, Dexuan Cui wrote: In the previous commit we enable largefile setting in meta-yocto/conf/distro/poky.conf, so we need to re-build busybox to actually enable it. I guess this would be a good case for using something like OE .dev's DISTRO_PR. It would be a bit

[OE-core] [PATCH] gettext: fix ERROR: QA Issue: gettext rdepends on gettext-dev

2011-07-01 Thread Koen Kooi
This was fixed in 2008 already, see http://dominion.thruhere.net/koen/cms/the-testlab-strikes-again but regressed during the 0.16.x - 0.18.x update. Strangely enough the comment was kept. Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi k...@dominion.thruhere.net --- meta/recipes-core/gettext/gettext_0.18.1.1.bb |

Re: [OE-core] PRIORITY

2011-07-01 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 1 jul 2011, om 11:41 heeft Phil Blundell het volgende geschreven: We had some discussion of this a few weeks ago but I'm not sure it ever reached a firm conclusion. Is everyone agreed that the PRIORITY variable does not serve any useful purpose in oe-core and can/should be removed from

Re: [OE-core] PRIORITY

2011-07-01 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 10:41 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: We had some discussion of this a few weeks ago but I'm not sure it ever reached a firm conclusion. Is everyone agreed that the PRIORITY variable does not serve any useful purpose in oe-core and can/should be removed from the recipes? I

Re: [OE-core] Proposal: recipe feature switches

2011-07-01 Thread Frans Meulenbroeks
2011/7/1 Koen Kooi k...@dominion.thruhere.net Op 1 jul 2011, om 11:26 heeft Frans Meulenbroeks het volgende geschreven: 2011/7/1 Koen Kooi k...@dominion.thruhere.net Op 1 jul 2011, om 10:55 heeft Frans Meulenbroeks het volgende geschreven: Good idea. Personally I'd like to

Re: [OE-core] PRIORITY

2011-07-01 Thread Phil Blundell
On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 11:15 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 10:41 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: We had some discussion of this a few weeks ago but I'm not sure it ever reached a firm conclusion. Is everyone agreed that the PRIORITY variable does not serve any useful

Re: [OE-core] Proposal: recipe feature switches

2011-07-01 Thread Phil Blundell
On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 12:19 +0200, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: Well, as far as I know if it is in DEPENDS it will implicitly end up in RDEPENDS No, you've got it backwards. Items appearing in RDEPENDS are (to a first approximation) treated as if they are also in DEPENDS, but not the converse.

Re: [OE-core] Proposal: recipe feature switches

2011-07-01 Thread Chris Elston
I'm proposing something along the lines of the following: This is actually along the lines of what I've been thinking too! Cool, I'm glad I'm not alone on this one :) How about something like the syntax for the recipe: PACKAGECONFIG[ogg] = --enable-ogg, --disable-ogg, libogg

Re: [OE-core] Proposal: recipe feature switches

2011-07-01 Thread Phil Blundell
On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 12:53 +0200, Andrea Adami wrote: Now, the detractors have argued that those flags would be a nightmare for people packaging feeds, with no way for the package manager to detect those different recipes with the same name. That does indeed come up frequently but I think

Re: [OE-core] It's broken, please revert. Re: [PATCH 0/4 V4] Share gcc work directories

2011-07-01 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 11:08 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: Op 1 jul 2011, om 10:10 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven: On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 09:15 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: Op 1 jul 2011, om 01:26 heeft Saul Wold het volgende geschreven: Testing patches is not the sole responsibility of

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v4 7/8] task-base: remove modutils reference.

2011-07-01 Thread Anders Darander
* Anders Darander Anders Darander and...@chargestorm.se [07/01/11 01:52 PM]: from task-base.bb? Should that part just be new, general RRECOMMENDS = \ kernel-module-nls-utf8 \ I should have written: RRECOMMENDS_task-base = \ kernel-module-nls-utf8 \ Regards, Anders -- Anders

Re: [OE-core] PRIORITY

2011-07-01 Thread Frans Meulenbroeks
2011/7/1 Phil Blundell p...@pbcl.net On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 11:15 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 10:41 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: We had some discussion of this a few weeks ago but I'm not sure it ever reached a firm conclusion. Is everyone agreed that the

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v4 7/8] task-base: remove modutils reference.

2011-07-01 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 1 jul 2011, om 13:52 heeft Anders Darander het volgende geschreven: * Koen Kooi Koen Kooi k...@dominion.thruhere.net [07/01/11 09:20 AM]: Op 1 jul 2011, om 09:06 heeft Anders Darander het volgende geschreven: Also remove the other kernel24 references. Make everything dependent on

[OE-core] [PATCH v5 0/8] Linux 3.0 build support

2011-07-01 Thread Anders Darander
v5: - task-base.bb: Move the RDEPENDS- and RRECOMMENDS_task-base-kernel26 to *_task-base. v4: Removed the RFC in patch subject. - Merge the patches 2 and 4 from v3. - Bump PR in patch 2. - Delete the ignore*.patch from module-init-tools. In v2, the patch was just

[OE-core] [PATCH v5 2/8] image¡kernel.bblass module-init-tools: do not use depmod-2.6

2011-07-01 Thread Anders Darander
Change to only depend on virtual/*/depmod. Change all calls to only use depmod. Do not install depmod as depmod-2.6 Bump PR in module-init-tools-cross. Signed-off-by: Anders Darander and...@chargestorm.se --- meta/classes/image.bbclass |2 +-

[OE-core] [PATCH v5 1/8] Remove support for building 2.4 kernels

2011-07-01 Thread Anders Darander
Signed-off-by: Anders Darander and...@chargestorm.se --- meta/classes/kernel.bbclass | 12 ++-- meta/classes/module-base.bbclass |2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass b/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass index

[OE-core] [PATCH v5 5/8] modutils-initscripts: move recipe prior to modutils removal

2011-07-01 Thread Anders Darander
Signed-off-by: Anders Darander and...@chargestorm.se --- .../{modutils = module-init-tools}/files/PD.patch |0 .../files/modutils.sh |0 .../modutils-initscripts.bb|0 3 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) rename

[OE-core] [PATCH v5 3/8] modules-init-tools(-cross): update to 3.16

2011-07-01 Thread Anders Darander
Update to get support for Linux 3.0. Delete the ignore_arch_directory.patch (as it does not apply to 3.16). Signed-off-by: Anders Darander and...@chargestorm.se --- .../files/ignore_arch_directory.patch | 30 ...oss_3.12.bb = module-init-tools-cross_3.16.bb} |

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] Add support for remote layering.

2011-07-01 Thread Paul Eggleton
Hi Jeremy Have looked at this further and I really think this needs to be a separate utility, but one still written in python using bitbake's infrastructure (like bitbake-layers). The advantages of this approach: 1) Avoids reworking bitbake's initialisation and avoids possible re-execution. A

Re: [OE-core] It's broken, please revert. Re: [PATCH 0/4 V4] Share gcc work directories

2011-07-01 Thread Khem Raj
On Jul 1, 2011, at 4:00 AM, Koen Kooi k...@dominion.thruhere.net wrote: Op 1 jul 2011, om 10:32 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven: On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 09:15 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: incremental build with rm_work turned on: ERROR: Function 'do_configure' failed (see

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] insane bbclass: turn fatal errors back into fatal errors

2011-07-01 Thread Phil Blundell
On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 17:49 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: It's a white list, so: # 0 - non dev contains .so # 5 - .la contains installed=yes or reference to the workdir # 7 - the desktop file is not valid # 8 - .la contains reference to the workdir # 9 - LDFLAGS ignored Are warnings and #

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/6] kernel.bbclass: Ensure kernel/* internal sysroot working directory don't get packaged

2011-07-01 Thread Richard Purdie
From: Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org This removes a couple of megabytes of QA warnings! Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org --- meta/classes/kernel.bbclass |6 ++ 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/6] cairo: Clean up packaging and fix warnings

2011-07-01 Thread Richard Purdie
From: Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org There were a number of QA errors being reported when packaging cairo. This patch ensures the debug files go in the -dbg package, the .so development links go into the -dev package, .a files into -staticdev. It also switches back to

[OE-core] [PATCH 3/6] libpcre: Fix QA warnings

2011-07-01 Thread Richard Purdie
From: Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org This drops the split -dev packaging since it was broken and overcomplex. It ensures .so symlinks end up in the correct package. Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org ---

[OE-core] [PATCH 6/6] insane.bbclass: Start to rework this so specific checks can be easily made warnings/errors

2011-07-01 Thread Richard Purdie
From: Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org This patch means the warning/error handling can be controlled from local.conf and/or from the distro level and no longer uses numbers but strings instead. The system becomes extensible so that other classes can extend the path QA checks at

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 5/6] beecrypt: Fix up packaging QA warnings

2011-07-01 Thread Phil Blundell
On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 16:17 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: +FILES_${PN} = ${sysconfdir} ${libdir}/*.so.* ${libdir}/${BPN}/*.so.* You can use ${SOLIBS} there... +FILES_${PN}-dev += ${libdir}/${BPN}/*.so ${libdir}/${BPN}/*.la ... and ${SOLIBSDEV} there. p.

Re: [OE-core] [oe] Any reasons not to use newer ppp?

2011-07-01 Thread Steffen Sledz
On 30.06.2011 12:15, Phil Blundell wrote: On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 12:12 +0200, Steffen Sledz wrote: The current oe-dev master contains recipes for 2.4.4 and 2.4.5, but both are DEFAULT_PREFERENCE = -1, so 2.4.3 is used by default. We hit a problem in LCP open/close handling which is fixed in

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] insane bbclass: turn fatal errors back into fatal errors

2011-07-01 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 16:59 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: OK, comprehension fail on my part, sorry. Good to have them listed out explicitly though, thanks for that. The fatal errors are definitely not good things to be allowing through if we can avoid it. Without checking, do you have a

Re: [OE-core] It's broken, please revert. Re: [PATCH 0/4 V4] Share gcc work directories

2011-07-01 Thread Khem Raj
On 07/01/2011 07:01 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: Op 1 jul 2011, om 15:57 heeft Khem Raj het volgende geschreven: On Jul 1, 2011, at 4:00 AM, Koen Kooik...@dominion.thruhere.net wrote: Op 1 jul 2011, om 10:32 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven: On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 09:15 +0200, Koen

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] Add support for remote layering.

2011-07-01 Thread Jeremy Puhlman
On 7/1/2011 6:24 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote: Hi Jeremy Have looked at this further and I really think this needs to be a separate utility, but one still written in python using bitbake's infrastructure (like bitbake-layers). The advantages of this approach: 1) Avoids reworking bitbake's

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] insane bbclass: turn fatal errors back into fatal errors

2011-07-01 Thread Mark Hatle
On 7/1/11 12:16 PM, Khem Raj wrote: On 07/01/2011 10:12 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: gcc-4.6.0+svnr175150, non dev contains .so, gcc, /work/i586-poky-linux/gcc-4.6.0+svnr175150-r4/packages-split/gcc/usr/libexec/gcc/i586-poky-linux/4.6.1/liblto_plugin.so This should be packages with gcc

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] insane bbclass: turn fatal errors back into fatal errors

2011-07-01 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 1 jul 2011, om 19:25 heeft Mark Hatle het volgende geschreven: On 7/1/11 12:16 PM, Khem Raj wrote: On 07/01/2011 10:12 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: gcc-4.6.0+svnr175150, non dev contains .so, gcc,

[OE-core] [PATCH] consolekit: Add glib-2.0 to DEPENDS

2011-07-01 Thread Khem Raj
Otherwise it ends up with this error | configure: error: Package requirements (dbus-glib-1 = 0.82 | gobject-2.0 = 2.14 | gthread-2.0 = 2.14 | ) were not met: | | No package 'gobject-2.0' found | No package 'gthread-2.0' found | | Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if

[OE-core] [PATCH] ppp: sync packaging with OE .dev

2011-07-01 Thread Koen Kooi
This fixes the QA errors and the 2.4.3 vs 2.4.5 copy/paste mistake Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi k...@dominion.thruhere.net --- meta/recipes-connectivity/ppp/ppp_2.4.5.bb | 26 ++ 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] insane bbclass: turn fatal errors back into fatal errors

2011-07-01 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 19:33 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: Op 1 jul 2011, om 19:25 heeft Mark Hatle het volgende geschreven: On 7/1/11 12:16 PM, Khem Raj wrote: On 07/01/2011 10:12 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: gcc-4.6.0+svnr175150, non dev contains .so, gcc,

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] perl: Fix package qa rpath warnings.

2011-07-01 Thread nitin . a . kamble
From: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com Fix these kinds of Package QA warnings before they are converted into fetal errors: WARNING: QA Issue: package perl-module-compress contains bad RPATH /build_disk/poky_build/build0/tmp/sysroots/qemux86/usr/lib in file

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] perl recipes fix package qa rpath warnings

2011-07-01 Thread nitin . a . kamble
From: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com The following changes since commit ea518846b889a1bad2263d1cb49cb238a295a8e7: bitbake: Add missing bracket, somehow lost by sync scripts (2011-07-01 17:44:12 +0100) are available in the git repository at: git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] Add support for remote layering.

2011-07-01 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 11:43 -0700, Jeremy Puhlman wrote: Just a quick follow up, the part of this statement that to me is wrong, is it appears you are dictating work flow. While, imho, the layer management code which is above this level, is the place to dicate workflow. The patch is to core

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] ppp: sync packaging with OE .dev

2011-07-01 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 20:17 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: This fixes the QA errors and the 2.4.3 vs 2.4.5 copy/paste mistake Merged to master, thanks. Richard ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] perl recipes fix package qa rpath warnings

2011-07-01 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 13:54 -0700, nitin.a.kam...@intel.com wrote: From: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com The following changes since commit ea518846b889a1bad2263d1cb49cb238a295a8e7: bitbake: Add missing bracket, somehow lost by sync scripts (2011-07-01 17:44:12 +0100) are

Re: [OE-core] PRIORITY

2011-07-01 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 11:24 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 11:15 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 10:41 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: We had some discussion of this a few weeks ago but I'm not sure it ever reached a firm conclusion. Is everyone

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/6] QA Warnings Cleanup

2011-07-01 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 16:17 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: The following changes since commit 40ecaf6a59ba61e72d29d7e677197ef37c998408: uclibc: Add default uClibc.machine files (2011-07-01 00:40:10 +0100) are available in the git repository at:

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v5 0/8] Linux 3.0 build support

2011-07-01 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 15:07 +0200, Anders Darander wrote: v5: - task-base.bb: Move the RDEPENDS- and RRECOMMENDS_task-base-kernel26 to *_task-base. v4: Removed the RFC in patch subject. - Merge the patches 2 and 4 from v3. - Bump PR in patch 2. - Delete the ignore*.patch

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v4 7/8] task-base: remove modutils reference.

2011-07-01 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 14:05 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: Op 1 jul 2011, om 13:52 heeft Anders Darander het volgende geschreven: * Koen Kooi Koen Kooi k...@dominion.thruhere.net [07/01/11 09:20 AM]: Op 1 jul 2011, om 09:06 heeft Anders Darander het volgende geschreven: Also remove the other

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v5 7/8] task-base: remove modutils reference.

2011-07-01 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 15:32 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: Op 1 jul 2011, om 15:08 heeft Anders Darander het volgende geschreven: Also remove the other kernel24 references. Make everything dependent on kernel26 default. Move the RDEPENDS- and RRECOMMENDS_task-base-kernel26 to _task-base.

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 5/6] beecrypt: Fix up packaging QA warnings

2011-07-01 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 16:19 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 16:17 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: +FILES_${PN} = ${sysconfdir} ${libdir}/*.so.* ${libdir}/${BPN}/*.so.* You can use ${SOLIBS} there... +FILES_${PN}-dev += ${libdir}/${BPN}/*.so ${libdir}/${BPN}/*.la ... and

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] Add support for remote layering.

2011-07-01 Thread Jeremy Puhlman
On 7/1/2011 2:37 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 11:43 -0700, Jeremy Puhlman wrote: Just a quick follow up, the part of this statement that to me is wrong, is it appears you are dictating work flow. While, imho, the layer management code which is above this level, is the place