From: Zhai Edwin edwin.z...@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Zhai Edwin edwin.z...@intel.com
---
.../{pcmanfm_0.9.9.bb = pcmanfm_0.9.10.bb}|4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
rename meta/recipes-sato/pcmanfm/{pcmanfm_0.9.9.bb = pcmanfm_0.9.10.bb} (88%)
diff --git
From: Zhai Edwin edwin.z...@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Zhai Edwin edwin.z...@intel.com
---
.../x11vnc/{x11vnc_0.9.12.bb = x11vnc_0.9.13.bb} |8
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
rename meta/recipes-graphics/x11vnc/{x11vnc_0.9.12.bb = x11vnc_0.9.13.bb}
(66%)
diff
From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
[openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] on behalf of Richard
Purdie [richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org]
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 9:33 PM
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
Subject: Re: [OE-core]
Op 1 dec. 2011, om 17:31 heeft Ulf Samuelsson het volgende geschreven:
2011-12-01 16:37, Koen Kooi skrev:
Op 1 dec. 2011, om 14:16 heeft Philip Balister het volgende geschreven:
On 11/29/2011 03:06 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 29 nov. 2011, om 20:36 heeft Ulf Samuelsson het volgende
Op 2 dec. 2011, om 00:56 heeft Paul Eggleton het volgende geschreven:
Create a new build output history reporting class, using testlab.bbclass
from meta-oe as a base. This records information from images produced by
the build process in text files structured suitably for tracking within
a
Why have I been unsubscribed from the list??
Are we censoring users that voice opinions that for whatever reason do not
meet the list maintainer ??
Or did I say something that violates the list etiquette? If so I would have
appreciated a message about that (and perhaps a warning upfront). Not
On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 12:02 +0100, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
Why have I been unsubscribed from the list??
That is rather bizarre. Mailman will unsubscribe you if too many mails
are returned undeliverable, but you ought to get a warning before that
happens. I'll have a look at the logs and see
2011/12/2 Phil Blundell ph...@gnu.org
On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 12:02 +0100, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
Why have I been unsubscribed from the list??
That is rather bizarre. Mailman will unsubscribe you if too many mails
are returned undeliverable, but you ought to get a warning before that
On Friday 02 December 2011 11:15:31 Koen Kooi wrote:
Does this do a commit per build as well?
Yes, since the commit occurs when bitbake completes (in response to the
BuildCompleted event).
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
On Friday 02 December 2011 11:03:34 Koen Kooi wrote:
I know I forgot to update it, but that should be: 2007 - 2011
OK, I have updated this in the branch.
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
___
Openembedded-core
Ideally a specific revision of a layer should specify on which revision it
depends on/was tested with, so people can reproduce that same setup.
Randomly mixing revisions is a recipe for problems.
Expecting that a layer informs its users that something is changing is
probably not workable. How
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 11:34, Frans Meulenbroeks
fransmeulenbro...@gmail.com wrote:
Ideally a specific revision of a layer should specify on which revision it
depends on/was tested with, so people can reproduce that same setup.
I've been using combo-layer to this to work here at O.S. Systems
On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 15:55 +0800, edwin.z...@intel.com wrote:
From: Zhai Edwin edwin.z...@intel.com
All,
These are upgrade for libfm, pcmanfm and x11vnc. Pls. help review and pull.
The following changes since commit 9d6790c4409dee4d08fe6a47450125c406d0ba32:
cooker.py: Allow the -e
The pull request is to address [YOCTO #1568] - Add recipe for ltp/posix tests
and automate test.
ltp is ported from OE and updated to latest version(20110915). Testcases are
installed
to ${D}/opt/ltp and POISX test suite is also copied into ${D}/opt/ltp/testcases
folder.
Include ltp to
On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 19:20 -0800, Darren Hart wrote:
The syslinux and grub-efi classes were generating config files in the current
working directory. This caused a failure due to a race in the creation of the
directories leading to cwd changing and the build failing to find the config
files.
Signed-off-by: Jiajun Xu jiajun...@intel.com
---
meta/recipes-core/tasks/task-core-tools.bb |3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/tasks/task-core-tools.bb
b/meta/recipes-core/tasks/task-core-tools.bb
index 12d4ff9..6632b4f 100644
---
Add information for recipe ltp, which is ported from OE.
Signed-off-by: Jiajun Xu jiajun...@intel.com
---
.../conf/distro/include/distro_tracking_fields.inc |8
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/conf/distro/include/distro_tracking_fields.inc
Port ltp recipe from OE and upgraged to latest version(20110915).
Install ltp into ${D}/opt/ltp and POSIX test suite is also copied
into ${D}/opt/ltp/testcases.
TODO: Some cases are removed since they depend on command 'expect'.
It is not in Poky or OE and we will add it for enhancement next.
On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 08:46:43AM +, Mats Kärrman wrote:
From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
[openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] on behalf of Richard
Purdie [richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org]
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 9:33 PM
To: Patches
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com
---
meta/conf/bitbake.conf |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/conf/bitbake.conf b/meta/conf/bitbake.conf
index 87efd8e..552942b 100644
--- a/meta/conf/bitbake.conf
+++ b/meta/conf/bitbake.conf
@@ -166,6
On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 17:22 +0100, Martin Jansa wrote:
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com
---
meta/conf/bitbake.conf |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/conf/bitbake.conf b/meta/conf/bitbake.conf
index 87efd8e..552942b 100644
---
On 11/29/2011 07:00 AM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
Without this logrotate may fail like this:
compilation terminated.
| config.c:9:18: fatal error: popt.h: No such file or directory
Signed-off-by: Stefan Schmidtste...@datenfreihafen.org
---
meta/recipes-extended/logrotate/logrotate_3.7.9.bb |
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 1:55 AM, edwin.z...@intel.com wrote:
-PR = r2
+PR = r0
Isn't this wrong?
-M
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
The savings can be substantial. The resutls below are for a
core-image-minimal type image:
gzip:1.1G sstate-cache
xz 714M sstate-cache
Signed-off-by: Matthew McClintock m...@freescale.com
---
v2: This one actually works!
meta/classes/sstate.bbclass | 19 +++
1
On Friday 02 December 2011 17:21:57 McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote:
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 1:55 AM, edwin.z...@intel.com wrote:
-PR = r2
+PR = r0
Isn't this wrong?
In this case since PV has been increased at the same time (by renaming the
recipe) it's not only OK, it's recommended
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Paul Eggleton
paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com wrote:
In this case since PV has been increased at the same time (by renaming the
recipe) it's not only OK, it's recommended practice.
Ahh Ok. New recipe = reset PR.
Thanks,
Matthew
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com
---
meta/classes/base.bbclass |2 +-
meta/conf/bitbake.conf|1 +
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/classes/base.bbclass b/meta/classes/base.bbclass
index ea53498..fbcaefb 100644
---
NOTE: this requires a patch I sent to the BitBake list[1] to error cleanly,
otherwise you'll see a Python backtrace and the build fail...
Per some discussion on the list recently this patch sets BB_STRICT_CHECKSUM
in the default-distrovars.inc so that missing checksums in recipes raises an
error.
Set BB_STRICT_CHECKSUM in default-distrovars so that an error is raised
if no checksum is set.
Signed-off-by: Joshua Lock j...@linux.intel.com
---
meta/conf/distro/include/default-distrovars.inc |3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com
---
meta/classes/base.bbclass | 2 +-
meta/conf/bitbake.conf | 1 +
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 9:18 AM, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
So if you have some layer adding
layerB: PR .= .b0
and other
layerA: PR .= .a0
and PR appends are evaluated in this order, then you will break upgrade
patch forever if you have to remove layerB for some reason and
From: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com
Add support for building with x32 toolchain.
Simplified the use of SRC_URI S vars across multiple files.
Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com
Signed-off-by: H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com
---
meta/recipes-graphics/mesa/mesa-7.11.inc
From: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com
These commits fixes building of various recipes with x32 toolchain
for x32 target/machines. And these do not affect these recipes for
other non-x32 targets.
X32 is new ABI for x86-64 architecture.
For more information refer:
From: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com
This fixes bug: [YOCTO #1403]
Earlier hack was breaking compiler parameters set by tune settings. And that
caused x32
build failure. Now previous CC parameters are kept intact while adding new -L
parameter.
Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble
From: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com
Make the assembly syntax compatible with x32 gcc. Othewise x32 gcc throws
errors.
This Fixes bug: [YOCTO #1412]
Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com
---
.../liboil/liboil-0.3.17/liboil_fix_for_x32.patch | 222
From: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com
Pass along CC CFLAGS vars so that the tune parameters set get used.
This fixes compilation with x32 toolchain.
Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com
Signed-off-by: H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com
---
From: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com
By hardcoding CC's definition in the Makefile, all the gcc parameters
set by tune settings are lost. Causing compile failure with x32 toolchain
As the bitbake defined CC is good, there is no need to redfine CC in the
make file, hence removed it to
From: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com
Add support for building with x32 toolchain.
Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com
Signed-off-by: H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com
---
meta/recipes-support/gmp/gmp/gmp_bugfix.patch | 94
From: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com
Don't always define LONG64 for AMD64
X32 defines __amd64__/amd64 with 32bit long. We should simply check
__LP64__ before defining LONG64 without checking __amd64__/amd64.
This fixes compilation with x32 toolchain.
Signed-Off-By: H.J. Lu
From: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com
This Fixes bug: [YOCTO #1417]
Properly load arguments 5 an 6 for x86-64 syscall
Use asm (r10) and asm (r8) to load arguments 5 an 6 for x86-64
syscall so that it works with both x32 and x86-64.
Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com
From: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com
Add BN_ADDR for address type instead of using BN_ULONG or unsigned long:
1. For W64, address type is unsigned long long, not unsigned long.
2. For x32, address type is unsigned long , not BN_ULONG.
Added a new targetlinux-x32 in the config file
On 2011-12-02 10:49, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 1 dec. 2011, om 17:31 heeft Ulf Samuelsson het volgende geschreven:
2011-12-01 16:37, Koen Kooi skrev:
Op 1 dec. 2011, om 14:16 heeft Philip Balister het volgende geschreven:
On 11/29/2011 03:06 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 29 nov. 2011, om 20:36 heeft
From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
[openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] on behalf of Martin Jansa
[martin.ja...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 5:18 PM
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
Subject: Re: [OE-core] Coordinating
Hi
after pulling latest sources (angstrom environment) I get:
Pseudo is not present but is required, building this first before the main build
NOTE: angstrom DOES NOT support libiconv because the eglibc provided iconv
library is used
On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 12:02 +0100, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
Why have I been unsubscribed from the list??
Are we censoring users that voice opinions that for whatever reason do
not meet the list maintainer ??
Or did I say something that violates the list etiquette? If so I would
have
On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 01:11:03AM +0100, Andreas Müller wrote:
Hi
after pulling latest sources (angstrom environment) I get:
Pseudo is not present but is required, building this first before the main
build
NOTE: angstrom DOES NOT support libiconv because the eglibc provided iconv
46 matches
Mail list logo
