We were trying to move this from the current directory instead of the
path. Let's just use shutil.move() instead of shelling out to mv.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton
---
scripts/lib/devtool/upgrade.py | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff
Fix several issues when extracting the new version source over the top
of the old one (when the recipe is not fetching from a git repo):
* Delete the old source first so we ensure files deleted in the new
version are deleted. This also has the side-effect of fixing any
issues where files
* Use a more real-world test of a recipe pointing to a remote file
* The cleanup tracking / teardown commands need to be added towards the
top, or they won't have the desired effect of cleaning up if the test
fails.
* Check that a versioned subdirectory gets renamed to match the new
version
Add a test for devtool upgrade with a recipe pointing to a git
repository, since this uses several different code paths.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton
---
.../devtool/devtool-upgrade-test2_git.bb | 18 +++
We aren't modifying the datastore copy here, so we don't need a copy at
all.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton
---
scripts/lib/devtool/upgrade.py | 7 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/scripts/lib/devtool/upgrade.py
When we do an upgrade from one tarball version to another we want to:
1) Check out the old version as a new branch
2) Record the changes between the old and new versions as a commit
3) Check out the old version with patches applied
4) Rebase that onto the new branch
Where we went wrong was step
If the actual value of PV isn't in the name of the recipe (for example,
a git or svn recipe) there's no point trying to rename it. Additionally,
we already have the original filename, there's no need to guess it -
just pass it in.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton
---
For recipes that specify SRCREV, the code here wasn't quite doing the
right thing. If the recipe has a SRCREV then that needs changing on
upgrade, so ensure that the user specifies it. If it doesn't, then it'll
be "INVALID" not None since the former is the actual default, so handle
that properly
The PR value should be reset to the default when upgrading, so we need
to drop it from the newly created file.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton
---
scripts/lib/devtool/upgrade.py | 7 ---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git
Make this consistent with "devtool add" so that the user knows where to
find the new recipe.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton
---
scripts/lib/devtool/upgrade.py | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/scripts/lib/devtool/upgrade.py
As suggested by Khem Raj.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton
---
scripts/lib/devtool/standard.py | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/scripts/lib/devtool/standard.py b/scripts/lib/devtool/standard.py
index daf18c9..bcf6520 100644
---
Make devtool upgrade consistent with devtool add/modify in defaulting to
sources/ under the workspace if no source tree path is
specified.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton
---
scripts/lib/devtool/upgrade.py | 22 +++---
1 file changed, 15
If you for example ran devtool modify virtual/libusb0 without specifying
a source tree path, the default was /sources/virtual/libusb0
which isn't correct - it should be using the mapped name i.e.
libusb-compat (in the default OE-Core configuration). Reorder some of
the code to ensure that the
The recipename argument to devtool upgrade specifies an existing recipe,
so by definition the name will be valid (or it won't exist) - we don't
need to validate it ourselves, that's only needed for situations like in
devtool add where we're creating a new recipe.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton
I had occasion to look at devtool upgrade recently and found quite a
number of issues. Fix those, improve the tests and fix a couple of minor
things in devtool add and devtool modify as well.
The following changes since commit 205b446f3fc4a9885179a66a8dab9d81bcc63dca:
uclibc: Do not use
Signed-off-by: Tudor Florea
---
meta/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-tools-profile.bb | 4
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-tools-profile.bb
Signed-off-by: Tudor Florea
---
.../lttng-ust-add-support-for-aarch64_be.patch | 17 +
meta/recipes-kernel/lttng/lttng-ust_git.bb | 4 +++-
2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644
Signed-off-by: Tudor Florea
---
.../liburcu/liburcu/0002-Support-for-aarch64_be.patch | 19 +++
meta/recipes-support/liburcu/liburcu_0.9.1.bb | 1 +
2 files changed, 20 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
Fails to build for qemuarm when thumb is enabled.
Why was:
ARM_INSTRUCTION_SET = "arm"
removed in
http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=77dbf07293df15cd5473422abd678930d6277bb0
without checking if it works?
| {standard input}: Assembler messages:
| {standard input}:288:
From: Armin Kuster
please consider these changes for the next fido update.
This is to meet our obligation for Yocto compatibility
The following changes since commit 9037f2c7c797367c2d09b87f344ecf749d28cb41:
gdk-pixbuf: Security fix CVE-2015-7674 (2016-02-22 19:08:53
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I tested this with builds in my workstation and (local, internal)
autobuilder, where TEST_SUITES is *not* specified in local.conf, so the
TEST_SUITES are taken from the DEFAULT_TEST_SUITES variable for each
image, which makes the tests work for the
Hi Franco, how did you test this? what is the behavior you get with
these defaults instead of how's behaving now?
See comments below.
On Tue, 2016-02-23 at 09:14 +, Alex Franco wrote:
> Modify existing default test suites to reuse the new
> generic test suites.
>
> Related to [YOCTO #8410]
On 23 February 2016 at 11:47, wrote:
> +ALTERNATIVE_${PN}-doc += "eject.1 su.1"
>
WARNING: util-linux-2.27.1-r0 do_package: util-linux: alternative target
(/usr/share/man/man1/su.1 or /usr/share/man/man1/su.1.util-linux) does not
exist, skipping...
WARNING:
Changelog since 2016-02-14 until 2016-02-21. Projects included in this report:
bitbake: git://git.openembedded.org/bitbake
openembedded-core: git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core
meta-openembedded: git://git.openembedded.org/meta-openembedded
meta-angstrom:
The fontconfig dependency was previously met indirectly (via cairo).
Signed-off-by: Andre McCurdy
---
meta/recipes-graphics/harfbuzz/harfbuzz_1.2.1.bb | 10 --
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
Overview of changes leading to 1.2.1
Friday, February 23, 2016
- CoreText: Fix bug with wrong scale if font scale was changed later.
https://github.com/libass/libass/issues/212
- CoreText: Drastically speed up font initialization.
- CoreText: Fix tiny leak.
On 23 February 2016 at 18:01, Christopher Larson
wrote:
> db isn't the only recipe doing that. The fetcher unpack method knows where
> it's unpacking to, I think if anyone should be clearing out the destination
> first, it should.
If that's true for tarballs, I agree. I
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 6:55 AM Burton, Ross wrote:
>
> On 23 February 2016 at 11:36, Markus Lehtonen <
> markus.lehto...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
>> Make sure that we have a pristine source tree after do_unpack.
>>
>
> Interestingly this fails on db-native rebuild for
Add generic test suites MINTESTSUITE, NETTESTSUITE, DEVTESTSUITE to
group common test suites.
Add DEFAULT_TEST_SUITES_pn- variables for:
* core-image-minimal-dev
* core-image-full-cmdline
* core-image-x11
* core-image-lsb
* core-image-lsb-dev
New default test suites use generic test
Modify existing default test suites to reuse the new
generic test suites.
Related to [YOCTO #8410]
Signed-off-by: Alex Franco
---
meta/classes/testimage.bbclass | 12 +++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git
- Add generic variables to reuse values in default test suites
- Add more default test suites variables
- Modify existing test suites to use generic vars when possible
[YOCTO #8410]
Alex Franco (2):
testimage.bbclass: add generic, image test suites
testimage.bbclass: reuse generic test
On 23 February 2016 at 17:01, Burton, Ross wrote:
> The *amazing* BB_VERBOSE_LOGS option (set to 1 in local.conf to get all
> shell scripts to do set -x) tells me this is due to missing quotes around
> the opts assignment:
>
Why do some of the opts assignments just do
On 23 February 2016 at 16:29, Burton, Ross wrote:
> I got an error when openssh's do_install was running useradds to the
> sysroot:
>
> | DEBUG: Executing shell function useradd_sysroot
> | Running useradd commands...
> |
>
On 23 February 2016 at 02:45, wrote:
> When perform useradd during populate sysroot, it locks files passwd.lock
> and group.lock at same time. And then it meets a dead lock issue
> randomly.
>
> Use flock to reslove it by using an universal lock file for all the
> user
Hi Khem,
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 10:40:28AM -0500, Khem Raj wrote:
>Uclibc has its own argp implemented as libuargp so please use that you dont
>need yet another implementation
>>On Feb 23, 2016 10:18 AM, "Maxin B. John" wrote:
>>
>>Without this, uclibc build of rng-tools
From: Armin Kuster
Please consider these for the next fido
This is to meet our obligation for Yocto compatibility
The following changes since commit 06d9c894636352a6c93711c7284d02b0c794a527:
libbsd: Security fix CVE-2016-2090 (2016-02-18 11:03:10 +)
are available
On 23 February 2016 at 15:40, Khem Raj wrote:
> Uclibc has its own argp implemented as libuargp so please use that you
> dont need yet another implementation
>
So the proper fix is to change rng-tools so it doesn't depend on
argp-standalone on uclibc I guess.
Ross
--
Uclibc has its own argp implemented as libuargp so please use that you dont
need yet another implementation
On Feb 23, 2016 10:18 AM, "Maxin B. John" wrote:
> Without this, uclibc build of rng-tools will fail with this error:
>
> ERROR: Nothing PROVIDES 'argp-standalone'
>
* when enabled, configure check for "fonts" directory existence in following
directories:
/usr/X11R6/lib/X11 /usr/X11/lib/X11 /usr/lib/X11
on _host_ system and if it exists it adds element to
/etc/fonts/fonts.conf
* update_font_cache postinst will then fail if host system has e.g.
Without this, uclibc build of rng-tools will fail with this error:
ERROR: Nothing PROVIDES 'argp-standalone'
(but rng-tools_5.bb DEPENDS on or otherwise requires it)
ERROR: argp-standalone was skipped: incompatible with host
x86_64-poky-linux-uclibc (not in COMPATIBLE_HOST)
ERROR: Required build
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 05:20:20PM +0100, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 06:08:45PM +0200, Dragomir Daniel wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 02/16/2016 04:54 PM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 04:28:38PM +0200, Daniel Dragomir wrote:
> > >> From: Cristian Bercaru
Hi Everybody
Currently debugging using sysroots seems to work as long as the work folder
containing the original source is available.
Once this work dir is gone the debugger is no longer able to find the source
code. This is especially confusing if some packages are taken from sstate and
On 23 February 2016 at 11:36, Markus Lehtonen <
markus.lehto...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> Make sure that we have a pristine source tree after do_unpack.
>
Interestingly this fails on db-native rebuild for me, as db is playing
games with S (it's not the top of the tarball). I had a look at the
There has been regressions seen in 1.1.13 hence
a quick 1.1.14 release is made
license checksum changed due to updates to authors/contributors list
here is the list of all changes between 1.1.13 and 1.1.14
http://git.musl-libc.org/cgit/musl/log/?qt=range=v1.1.13..v1.1.14
Signed-off-by: Khem
On 23 February 2016 at 11:47, wrote:
> From: Guojian Zhou
>
> Update alternatives of info pages in several packages.
>
> Signed-off-by: Guojian Zhou
>
Presumably these files are all identical, so would it be
From: Guojian Zhou
Update alternatives of info pages in several packages.
Signed-off-by: Guojian Zhou
---
meta/recipes-devtools/autoconf/autoconf.inc | 6 +-
meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils.inc | 7 +++
From: Guojian Zhou
Update alternatives of man pages between util-linx and shadow packages.
Signed-off-by: Guojian Zhou
---
meta/recipes-core/util-linux/util-linux.inc | 3 +++
meta/recipes-extended/shadow/shadow.inc | 4 +++-
2 files
It would seem reasonable that do_unpack() always results in a pristine source
tree. This patch causes ${S} to be removed before unpacking sources.
I didn't quite understand what kind of "investigation" the following code
comment in do_unpack() was referring to:
# TODO: Investigate if we can
Make sure that we have a pristine source tree after do_unpack.
[YOCTO #9064]
Signed-off-by: Markus Lehtonen
---
meta/classes/base.bbclass | 8 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/classes/base.bbclass
Hi,
Resending as my I got a strange "Only members may post to the list."
error yesterday...
On Fri, 2016-02-19 at 17:45 +0200, Ioan-Adrian Ratiu wrote:
> This patch series extends the gpg_sign module to support ipk signing.
>
> v6 implements Markus' feedback. The most notable change is the
>
Hi,
Resending as my I got a strange "Only members may post to the list."
error yesterday...
On Fri, 2016-02-19 at 17:43 +0200, Ioan-Adrian Ratiu wrote:
> Starting from v2.1 passing passwords directly to gpg does not work
> anymore [1], instead a loopback interface must be used otherwise
> gpg
Hi,
Resending as my I got a strange "Only members may post to the list."
error yesterday...
On Fri, 2016-02-19 at 17:43 +0200, Ioan-Adrian Ratiu wrote:
> Implement ipk signing inside the sign_ipk bbclass using the gpg_sign
> module and configure signing similar to how rpm does it. sign_ipk
>
Fix 'O_CLOEXEC' undeclared error with uclibc
Signed-off-by: Maxin B. John
---
.../drm/libdrm/fix_O_CLOEXEC_undeclared.patch | 24 ++
meta/recipes-graphics/drm/libdrm_2.4.66.bb | 1 +
2 files changed, 25 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
Hi Ross,
>On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 09:25:01AM +, Burton, Ross wrote:
>
>>On 23 February 2016 at 09:12, Maxin B. John wrote:
>>
>> ++#ifndef _GNU_SOURCE
>> ++#define _GNU_SOURCE
>> ++#endif
>#including config.h is probably a better fix, as that already defines
On 23 February 2016 at 09:12, Maxin B. John wrote:
> ++#ifndef _GNU_SOURCE
> ++#define _GNU_SOURCE
> ++#endif
>
#including config.h is probably a better fix, as that already defines
GNU_SOURCE.
Ross
--
___
Openembedded-core
Fix 'O_CLOEXEC' undeclared error with uclibc
Signed-off-by: Maxin B. John
---
.../drm/libdrm/fix_O_CLOEXEC_undeclared.patch | 26 ++
meta/recipes-graphics/drm/libdrm_2.4.66.bb | 1 +
2 files changed, 27 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
56 matches
Mail list logo