Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] base-files: profile: Get rid of "resize"

On 18-09-17 21:19, Burton, Ross wrote: On 18 September 2017 at 20:01, Andre McCurdy > wrote: > The question is does it do something useful *now*? I don't have a board with a serial console to test at the moment. Busybox hasn't

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] base-files: profile: Get rid of "resize"

On 18-09-17 20:43, Burton, Ross wrote: On 18 September 2017 at 19:41, Andre McCurdy > wrote: On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 8:17 AM, Burton, Ross > wrote: > On 18 September 2017 at

[OE-core] [PATCH] strace: Fix ptest bulds with musl/mips

Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- ...tion-Check-for-mips-and-alpha-before-usin.patch | 37 ++ meta/recipes-devtools/strace/strace_4.18.bb| 1 + 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+) create mode 100644

[OE-core] [PATCH v2] u-boot-fw-utils: Fix cross and target builds

- The environment tools target has change to envtools; - The HOSTCC variable must be used to set CC for cross; - The ARCH variable must be set for cross; Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador --- Changes in v2: - pass V=1 for cross - sorry

[OE-core] [PATCH] u-boot-fw-utils: Fix cross and target builds

- The environment tools target has change to envtools; - The HOSTCC variable must be used to set CC for cross; - The ARCH variable must be set for cross; Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador --- meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2017.09.bb | 6 +++--- 1 file

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] sysvinit-inittab: start_getty: Cleanup comments

Look's good to me. Thanks and Regards Choong Yin Thong -Original Message- From: Andrea Adami [mailto:andrea.ad...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, September 16, 2017 7:36 AM To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Cc: Choong, Yin Thong ; Saul Wold

Re: [OE-core] [PATCHv2] pseudo: use epoll API on Linux

On Mon, 18 Sep 2017 19:41:03 -0400 Trevor Woerner wrote: > Would you be open to a co-maintainership? Maybe a co-maintainer who > doesn't push to master directly? Maybe? I don't know, I'd need to think about that a bit. I recognize that there's a need to get some of this

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] scripts: rename yocto-compat-layer to remove "compatible" nomenclature

"Yocto Project Compatible" [1] is a programme which requires you meet specific criteria including going through an application process - it is not sufficient simply to run the script we have created here and have it produce no warnings/errors. To avoid people being confused by the fact that this

Re: [OE-core] meta-toolchain / /bin/sh requirement / ldconfig backfill

On 9/18/17 5:56 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote: > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 3:00 PM, Mark Hatle wrote: >> On 9/18/17 4:33 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote: >>> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Mark Hatle >>> wrote: On 9/18/17 4:05 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote:

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] scripts: rename yocto-compat-layer to remove "compatible" nomenclature

The following changes since commit cbc396dd10488990c98bb6fd94c7d10a736d57c1: gawk: Enable native building (2017-09-18 11:07:24 +0100) are available in the git repository at: git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib paule/yocto-compat-rename

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] u-boot: Upgrade to 2017.09

On 2017-09-17 11:35 AM, Khem Raj wrote: I am seeing same failures too. havent yet dug into it. Same here. Jackie said that he's going to investigate now. We've only seen this failure since 2017-09-15 06:00 AM ET after we rebased onto 2017-09-14 content/ this commit: 583dca2

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] init-ifupdown: RDEPENDS on procps

Hi, Khem: > busybox can provide the sysctl applet too. Do we take care of that somewhere ? sysctl applet has been already compiled since CONFIG_BB_SYSCTL is being enabled in busybox defconfig. //Ming Liu 2017-09-18 18:51 GMT+02:00 Khem Raj : > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at

[OE-core] [PATCH] nspr: Fix build with musl/mips

Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- .../nspr/nspr/0001-md-Fix-build-with-musl.patch| 31 ++ meta/recipes-support/nspr/nspr_4.16.bb | 1 + 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+) create mode 100644

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] nspr: 4.14 -> 4.16

On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 2:19 AM, Huang Qiyu wrote: > Upgrade nspr from 4.14 to 4.16 > This breaks build with musl. You can reproduce it with TCLIBC=musl MACHINE=qemumips bitbake nspr > Signed-off-by: Huang Qiyu > --- >

Re: [OE-core] [PATCHv2] pseudo: use epoll API on Linux

On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 7:18 PM, Seebs wrote: > On Mon, 18 Sep 2017 19:16:13 -0400 > Trevor Woerner wrote: > >> It doesn't make sense to carry these large patches against pseudo in >> OE itself. Isn't pseudo one of the tools under The Yocto Project >>

Re: [OE-core] go-runtime does not build for mips32r2 tune

On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 3:52 PM, Mark Hatle wrote: > On 9/18/17 5:50 PM, Matt Madison wrote: >> >>> On 18 Sep 2017, at 2:11 PM, Slater, Joseph >> > wrote: >>> >>> This is the default tune for qemumips. It

Re: [OE-core] [PATCHv2] pseudo: use epoll API on Linux

On Mon, 18 Sep 2017 19:16:13 -0400 Trevor Woerner wrote: > It doesn't make sense to carry these large patches against pseudo in > OE itself. Isn't pseudo one of the tools under The Yocto Project > umbrella? Yes. But the pool of people with the variety of expertise needed to

Re: [OE-core] [PATCHv2] pseudo: use epoll API on Linux

It doesn't make sense to carry these large patches against pseudo in OE itself. Isn't pseudo one of the tools under The Yocto Project umbrella? Adding patches to a recipe is what happens when upstream isn't under our control, isn't responsive, or isn't cooperating. Can someone volunteer to be the

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] base-files: profile: Get rid of "resize"

I use resize quasi-regularly. Ever end up in the situation where you've run vim and now the command-line has no idea how large the console is, so everything wraps or scrolls at the wrong times/places? resize fixes that: # . resize Please don't remove it. --

Re: [OE-core] meta-toolchain / /bin/sh requirement / ldconfig backfill

On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 3:00 PM, Mark Hatle wrote: > On 9/18/17 4:33 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Mark Hatle wrote: >>> On 9/18/17 4:05 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote: On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Mark Hatle

Re: [OE-core] go-runtime does not build for mips32r2 tune

On 9/18/17 5:50 PM, Matt Madison wrote: > >> On 18 Sep 2017, at 2:11 PM, Slater, Joseph > > wrote: >> >> This is the default tune for qemumips.  It appears that the problem does not >> occur for an oe-core checkout just before the split

Re: [OE-core] go-runtime does not build for mips32r2 tune

> On 18 Sep 2017, at 2:11 PM, Slater, Joseph wrote: > > This is the default tune for qemumips. It appears that the problem does not > occur for an oe-core checkout just before the split creating go-runtime. > > Before the split, go-helloworld will build, but after

[OE-core] [PATCH] eudev: use archive tarball instead of Github generated tarball

The Github-generated tarballs can and do change over time, so point at the archived tarball website that the maintainer hosts. Signed-off-by: Ross Burton --- meta/recipes-core/udev/eudev_3.2.2.bb | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git

Re: [OE-core] meta-toolchain / /bin/sh requirement / ldconfig backfill

On 9/18/17 4:33 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote: > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Mark Hatle wrote: >> On 9/18/17 4:05 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote: >>> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Mark Hatle >>> wrote: Because of this, there is no way

Re: [OE-core] meta-toolchain / /bin/sh requirement / ldconfig backfill

On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Mark Hatle wrote: > On 9/18/17 4:05 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Mark Hatle >> wrote: >>> >>> Because of this, there is no way (with a default configuration) to build >>>

Re: [OE-core] meta-toolchain / /bin/sh requirement / ldconfig backfill

On 9/18/17 3:53 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Mark Hatle wrote: >> I tried to build the meta-toolchain, toolchain SDK today and received an >> error. >> My system is configured to use package_rpm by default... >> >> The error I got was: >> >>

Re: [OE-core] meta-toolchain / /bin/sh requirement / ldconfig backfill

On 9/18/17 4:05 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote: > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Mark Hatle wrote: >> >> Because of this, there is no way (with a default configuration) to build >> meta-toolchain >> >> Investigating further, ldconfig support moved from "USE_LDCONFIG" to

[OE-core] go-runtime does not build for mips32r2 tune

This is the default tune for qemumips. It appears that the problem does not occur for an oe-core checkout just before the split creating go-runtime. Before the split, go-helloworld will build, but after the split it will not because it needs go-runtime. Joe --

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] base-files: profile: Get rid of "resize"

On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 1:18 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: >> > There's a call to ioctl with TIOCSWINSZ which I'm >> > *guessing* is set window size. Google is not useful for this! It does >> > all this on stderr. >> > >> > So yes it *should* work, but not if you redirect

Re: [OE-core] meta-toolchain / /bin/sh requirement / ldconfig backfill

On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Mark Hatle wrote: > > Because of this, there is no way (with a default configuration) to build > meta-toolchain > > Investigating further, ldconfig support moved from "USE_LDCONFIG" to a > distribution configuration. It does this

Re: [OE-core] meta-toolchain / /bin/sh requirement / ldconfig backfill

On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Mark Hatle wrote: > I tried to build the meta-toolchain, toolchain SDK today and received an > error. > My system is configured to use package_rpm by default... > > The error I got was: > > Error: > Problem: package >

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] base-files: profile: Get rid of "resize"

On 18 September 2017 at 20:30, Andre McCurdy wrote: > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 12:19 PM, Burton, Ross > wrote: > > On 18 September 2017 at 20:01, Andre McCurdy > wrote: > >> > >> > The question is does it do something useful

[OE-core] meta-toolchain / /bin/sh requirement / ldconfig backfill

I tried to build the meta-toolchain, toolchain SDK today and received an error. My system is configured to use package_rpm by default... The error I got was: Error: Problem: package packagegroup-core-standalone-sdk-target-1.0-r8.noarch requires libstdc++6, but none of the

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] base-files: profile: Get rid of "resize"

On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 12:19 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: > On 18 September 2017 at 20:01, Andre McCurdy wrote: >> >> > The question is does it do something useful *now*? >> >> I don't have a board with a serial console to test at the moment. >> Busybox

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] base-files: profile: Get rid of "resize"

On 18 September 2017 at 20:01, Andre McCurdy wrote: > > The question is does it do something useful *now*? > > I don't have a board with a serial console to test at the moment. > Busybox hasn't changed in recent memory though, so as long as the > resize command does actually

[OE-core] Go SDK automated test

Hello folks, I did try to understand the automated test infrastructure but ended lost on how the code was designed. So instead I wrote down a step by step test so someone which knows better the autotest infra can translate it. git clone https://github.com/golang/dep go/src/github.com/golang/dep

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] base-files: profile: Get rid of "resize"

On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Burton, Ross wrote: > On 18 September 2017 at 19:41, Andre McCurdy wrote: >> >> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 8:17 AM, Burton, Ross >> wrote: >> > On 18 September 2017 at 16:07, Peter Kjellerstedt >>

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] base-files: profile: Get rid of "resize"

On 18 September 2017 at 19:41, Andre McCurdy wrote: > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 8:17 AM, Burton, Ross > wrote: > > On 18 September 2017 at 16:07, Peter Kjellerstedt > > wrote: > >> > >> > -Original Message- > >> >

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] base-files: profile: Get rid of "resize"

On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 8:17 AM, Burton, Ross wrote: > On 18 September 2017 at 16:07, Peter Kjellerstedt > wrote: >> >> > -Original Message- >> > From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org >> >

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v2] openssh: Fix key generation with systemd

On 6 September 2017 at 14:21, Joshua Watt wrote: > On Tue, 2017-08-01 at 12:07 +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: > > Sorry didn't notice the v2. In staging now. > > I noticed this hasn't been merged yet, is there something holding it > up? It was implicated in a number of the

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] init-ifupdown: RDEPENDS on procps

On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 12:43:06PM +, liu.min...@gmail.com wrote: > From: Ming Liu > > sysctl is being called in /etc/init.d/networking, so it needs RDEPENDS > on procps. > > Signed-off-by: Ming Liu > --- >

Re: [OE-core] OpenEmbedded Developer Meeting Oct 22, 2017 in Prague (before ELCE)

Hi Mike, On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 8:45 AM, Mike Looijmans wrote: > I can probably bring some work (e.g. Zynq MPSoC board) and fun (settop box) > hardware along to demonstrate what I'm using OE for. Any chance you could set something up that could be on display at the

Re: [OE-core] [U-Boot] [PATCH] u-boot: Upgrade to 2017.09

On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 04:51:31PM +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: > On 18 September 2017 at 16:46, Otavio Salvador < > otavio.salva...@ossystems.com.br> wrote: > > > What is the policy on doing u-boot version upgrades this late in the > > > > release cycle? SHouldn't this wait until after the

Re: [OE-core] [U-Boot] [PATCH] u-boot: Upgrade to 2017.09

On 18 September 2017 at 16:46, Otavio Salvador < otavio.salva...@ossystems.com.br> wrote: > What is the policy on doing u-boot version upgrades this late in the > > release cycle? SHouldn't this wait until after the release? > > > Why? > > It is just another recipe and we are upgrading to the

Re: [OE-core] [U-Boot] [PATCH] u-boot: Upgrade to 2017.09

Em 18 de set de 2017 12:20 PM, "Philip Balister" escreveu: On 09/18/2017 02:39 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 10:31:05AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: >> On 09/18/2017 09:54 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: >>> u-boot-fw-utils-cross is broken for at least a year, if it

Re: [OE-core] [pseudo][PATCH] Fix to fcntl guts to ignore flags that can be ORed into cmd

On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 02:24:26PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Fri, 2017-09-15 at 18:10 -0500, Seebs wrote: > > On Fri, 15 Sep 2017 15:27:00 -0700 > > Will Page wrote: > > > > > > > > The fcntl guts switch on "cmd" parameter to identify the fcntl > > > command being

Re: [OE-core] [U-Boot] [PATCH] u-boot: Upgrade to 2017.09

On 09/18/2017 02:39 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 10:31:05AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: >> On 09/18/2017 09:54 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: >>> u-boot-fw-utils-cross is broken for at least a year, if it breaks a lot >>> of boards, why nobody complained yet? >> >> Didn't you say it

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] base-files: profile: Get rid of "resize"

On 18 September 2017 at 16:07, Peter Kjellerstedt < peter.kjellerst...@axis.com> wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org > > [mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of > > Mike Looijmans > > Sent: den 18

Re: [OE-core] [pseudo][PATCH] Fix to fcntl guts to ignore flags that can be ORed into cmd

On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 02:24:26PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Fri, 2017-09-15 at 18:10 -0500, Seebs wrote: > > On Fri, 15 Sep 2017 15:27:00 -0700 > > Will Page wrote: > > > > > > > > The fcntl guts switch on "cmd" parameter to identify the fcntl > > > command being

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] base-files: profile: Get rid of "resize"

> -Original Message- > From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org > [mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of > Mike Looijmans > Sent: den 18 september 2017 16:07 > To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > Cc: Mike Looijmans

[OE-core] Yocto Project Status WW38’17

Current Dev Position: YP 2.4 M4 Next Deadline: YP 2.4 Final Cut off is Sept. 18, 2017 SWAT team rotation: Alejandro -> Stephano on Sept. 15, 2017. SWAT team rotation: Stephano -> Maxin on Sept. 22, 2017 https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_Build_Failure_Swat_Team Key Status/Updates: ·

Re: [OE-core] Openembedded-core Digest, Vol 80, Issue 148

> Busybox can also provide sysctl so there's no hard dependency on procps. Arha, that is correct, please ignore my patch then. //Ming Liu 2017-09-18 16:37 GMT+02:00 : > Send Openembedded-core mailing list submissions to >

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] init-ifupdown: RDEPENDS on procps

Busybox can also provide sysctl so there's no hard dependency on procps. On 18-09-17 14:43, liu.min...@gmail.com wrote: From: Ming Liu sysctl is being called in /etc/init.d/networking, so it needs RDEPENDS on procps. Signed-off-by: Ming Liu ---

[OE-core] ✗ patchtest: failure for "base-files: profile: Do not as..." and 1 more (rev2)

== Series Details == Series: "base-files: profile: Do not as..." and 1 more (rev2) Revision: 2 URL : https://patchwork.openembedded.org/series/8967/ State : failure == Summary == Thank you for submitting this patch series to OpenEmbedded Core. This is an automated response. Several tests

[OE-core] [PATCH] base-files: profile: Get rid of "resize"

The "resize" command actually outputs shell commands to be executed, for example: $ resize COLUMNS=102; LINES=27; export COLUMNS LINES; The output of "resize" is being discarded to /dev/null so the call has no effect whatsoever, and does not change the environment (it cannot change the

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] base-files: profile: Do not assume that the 'command' command exists

On 18-09-17 15:24, Mike Looijmans wrote: On 18-09-17 15:08, Burton, Ross wrote: On 18 September 2017 at 12:31, Mike Looijmans > wrote: This is basically the same change as I first sent a patch for in April, and

[OE-core] [pyro][PATCH] goarch.bbclass: Replace logic for setting GOARM

From: Will Newton The previous logic applied a regex to TUNE_FEATURES which could set the GOARM value to 7 incorrectly, for example when dealing with an arm1176 core. Simplify to check for the presence of "armv7" instead. At the same time add a check for "armv6" and set

[OE-core] [PATCHv2] pseudo: use epoll API on Linux

The idea came up here: https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11309 and here: http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2017-August/141491.html Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin --- .../pseudo/files/0001-Use-epoll-API-on-Linux.patch |

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v5 04/26] goarch.bbclass: Replace logic for setting GOARM

On 09/18/2017 04:26 PM, Will Newton wrote: Would it be possible to get this patch backported to the Pyro branch? It fixes running Go programs on Raspberry Pi 1 systems which without this will die with illegal instruction errors. Just do the backport and submit it to this list with [pyro]

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v5 04/26] goarch.bbclass: Replace logic for setting GOARM

Hi Armin, Would it be possible to get this patch backported to the Pyro branch? It fixes running Go programs on Raspberry Pi 1 systems which without this will die with illegal instruction errors. Thanks, On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 1:45 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > From:

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] base-files: profile: Do not assume that the 'command' command exists

On 18-09-17 15:08, Burton, Ross wrote: On 18 September 2017 at 12:31, Mike Looijmans > wrote: This is basically the same change as I first sent a patch for in April, and last pinged this Friday... The only real

Re: [OE-core] [pseudo][PATCH] Fix to fcntl guts to ignore flags that can be ORed into cmd

On Fri, 2017-09-15 at 18:10 -0500, Seebs wrote: > On Fri, 15 Sep 2017 15:27:00 -0700 > Will Page wrote: > > > > > The fcntl guts switch on "cmd" parameter to identify the fcntl > > command being issued, but isn't aware of the file creation flags > > that > > can be ORed in. >

Re: [OE-core] OpenEmbedded Developer Meeting Oct 22, 2017 in Prague (before ELCE)

> On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 9:37 PM, Philip Balister wrote: Once again we will have a developer meeting in Prague the Sunday before ELCE. Please go to https://www.openembedded.org/wiki/OEDEM_2017 and add yourself if you are attending and ideas for topics. Although it is

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] base-files: profile: Do not assume that the 'command' command exists

On 18 September 2017 at 12:31, Mike Looijmans wrote: > This is basically the same change as I first sent a patch for in April, and >> last pinged this Friday... The only real difference is that this one >> misses >> passing error output from resize to /dev/null (which it

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] util-linux: package switch_root separately

On 18 September 2017 at 13:22, Ioan-Adrian Ratiu wrote: > Having only this utility is useful for tiny initramfs'es which don't > need the whole util-linux package (and neither the busybox binary > which is much bigger than switch_root) to do operations like decrypt > a

[OE-core] [PATCH] init-ifupdown: RDEPENDS on procps

From: Ming Liu sysctl is being called in /etc/init.d/networking, so it needs RDEPENDS on procps. Signed-off-by: Ming Liu --- meta/recipes-core/init-ifupdown/init-ifupdown_1.0.bb | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git

Re: [OE-core] [meta-oe][PATCH v3 2/2] libgcrypt: provide libgcrypt-config wrapper around pkg-config

On 09/15/2017 03:03 PM, Jussi Laako wrote: This patch adds a libgcrypt-config wrapper for pkg-config support in order to avoid patching all upstream packages using libgcrypt, while otherwise keeping pkg-config functionality. Signed-off-by: Jussi Laako ---

[OE-core] [PATCH] util-linux: package switch_root separately

Having only this utility is useful for tiny initramfs'es which don't need the whole util-linux package (and neither the busybox binary which is much bigger than switch_root) to do operations like decrypt a rootfs & switch to it in the init file. Signed-off-by: Ioan-Adrian Ratiu

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] base-files: profile: Do not assume that the 'command' command exists

On 18-09-17 10:49, Peter Kjellerstedt wrote: Kind regards, Mike Looijmans System Expert TOPIC Products Materiaalweg 4, NL-5681 RJ Best Postbus 440, NL-5680 AK Best Telefoon: +31 (0) 499 33 69 79 E-mail: mike.looijm...@topicproducts.com Website: www.topicproducts.com Please consider the

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] base-files: profile: Do not assume that the 'command' command exists

> -Original Message- > From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org > [mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of > Mike Looijmans > Sent: den 18 september 2017 10:39 > To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > Cc: Mike Looijmans

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] base-files: profile: Do not assume that the 'command' command exists

The "command" shell command appears to be a bashism, the standard busybox shell doesn't implement it. This avoids the following error when logging in to a host that does not have the 'command' command: -sh: command: not found It also simplifies the code and reduces the number of forks.

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] base-files: profile: Make the "resize" command have the intended effect

The "resize" command outputs shell script to be evaluated. The proper way to use it is to do: eval `resize` This sets the related environment variables COLUMNS and ROWS so that a vi invokation uses the proper dimensions. Without the "eval" part, running vi still gives a garbled screen when the

Re: [OE-core] [U-Boot] [PATCH] u-boot: Upgrade to 2017.09

On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 10:31:05AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > On 09/18/2017 09:54 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: > > u-boot-fw-utils-cross is broken for at least a year, if it breaks a lot > > of boards, why nobody complained yet? > > Didn't you say it worked for 2017.07 or did I misunderstand that ?

[OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2017-09-16

http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Bitbake_World_Status == Number of issues - stats == {| class='wikitable' !|Date !!colspan='3'|Failed tasks !!|Signatures !!colspan='14'|QA !!Comment |- || ||qemuarm ||qemux86 ||qemux86_64

Re: [OE-core] [U-Boot] [PATCH] u-boot: Upgrade to 2017.09

u-boot-fw-utils-cross is broken for at least a year, if it breaks a lot of boards, why nobody complained yet? On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 7:32 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: > On 09/17/2017 01:06 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > > I've verified that u-boot-fw-utils builds and installs

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v6] do_image: Implement IMAGE_ROOTFS_EXCLUDE_PATH feature.

Ping. Anything missing here? -- Kristian On 28/08/17 17:47, Kristian Amlie wrote: > This is a direct followup from the earlier 6602392db3d39 commit in > wic. It works more or less the same way: The variable specifies a list > of directories relative to the root of the rootfs, and these >