Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] tcf-agent: cleanup patches

2021-12-06 Thread Khem Raj
On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 4:47 AM Ross Burton wrote: > > ldflags.patch isn't really suitable for upstream, so mark inappropriate. > > fix_ranlib.patch has been rebased into uselessness over time, it's now > setting RANLIB to just '$@' which expands to '' when called, so is a > null operation. this

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] tcf-agent: cleanup patches

2021-12-06 Thread Khem Raj
On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 4:47 AM Ross Burton wrote: > > ldflags.patch isn't really suitable for upstream, so mark inappropriate. > > fix_ranlib.patch has been rebased into uselessness over time, it's now > setting RANLIB to just '$@' which expands to '' when called, so is a > null operation. > not

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] glibc: Drop fsqrt implementation patches for fsl ppc

2021-12-06 Thread Khem Raj
On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 3:32 PM Richard Purdie < richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Mon, 2021-12-06 at 15:28 -0800, Khem Raj wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 2:51 PM Richard Purdie > > wrote: > > > I did test such a patch today as well since we discussed it. I'd > propose >

[OE-core] Help with Inclusive Language in OpenEmbedded/Yocto Project

2021-12-06 Thread Jon Mason
This email is a follow-up from the session held on Friday at the OpenEmbedded Developer's Virtual Meeting (see https://www.openembedded.org/wiki/OEDVM_Nov_2021) The session was not recorded, but the slides can be found at

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] glibc: Drop fsqrt implementation patches for fsl ppc

2021-12-06 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2021-12-06 at 15:28 -0800, Khem Raj wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 2:51 PM Richard Purdie > wrote: > > I did test such a patch today as well since we discussed it. I'd propose > > this > > commit message since we need to say why: > > > > """ > > > > glibc: Drop ppc sqrt

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 4/4] core: udev: udev-extraconf: rename mount.blacklist* to mount.blocklist.*

2021-12-06 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2021-12-06 at 16:35 +0100, Quentin Schulz wrote: > blocklist has a more obvious meaning than blacklist and is also not an > issue wrt inclusivity, so let's use that naming instead. A "blocklist" with a filesystem is unfortunately confusing (a list of block numbers on the filesystem?).

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] glibc: Drop fsqrt implementation patches for fsl ppc

2021-12-06 Thread Khem Raj
On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 2:51 PM Richard Purdie < richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > I did test such a patch today as well since we discussed it. I'd propose > this > commit message since we need to say why: > > """ > > glibc: Drop ppc sqrt optimisations > > OpenEmbedded isn't an upstream

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] opkg: upgrade 0.4.5 -> 0.5.0

2021-12-06 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2021-12-06 at 13:13 -0600, Alex Stewart wrote: > You beat me to posting my own recipe upgrade commit. :) > > Toward the bottom of the opkg_*.bb recipe file is a > `package_qa_check_openssl_deprecation` function which I added in the > 0.4.5 release to warn BB users when they are building

[OE-core] [PATCH] glibc: Drop patch for obsolete conflict issue

2021-12-06 Thread Richard Purdie
We're no longer patching files called "libm-test-ulps" so this patch isn't really needed. Regardless, if we were, we should fix the real issue in the upstream code which may have already happened. Drop this patch. Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie --- ...m-err-tab.pl-with-specific-dirs-in-S.patch |

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/4] blacklist/blocklist and master/golden

2021-12-06 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2021-12-06 at 16:35 +0100, Quentin Schulz wrote: > Hi all, > > It seems some changes are not too invasive and can be made to be a bit > more inclusive, so I'll make the autobuilder try those patches and tell > me whether I broke something somewhere I wasn't aware of. > > In other words:

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] glibc: Drop fsqrt implementation patches for fsl ppc

2021-12-06 Thread Richard Purdie
I did test such a patch today as well since we discussed it. I'd propose this commit message since we need to say why: """ glibc: Drop ppc sqrt optimisations OpenEmbedded isn't an upstream or a patch repository. These are optimisations which for reasons unknown were never merged into upstream

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] glibc: Drop fsqrt implementation patches for fsl ppc

2021-12-06 Thread Khem Raj
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- ...5500-e6500-603e-fsqrt-implementation.patch | 1581 - ...undefined-reference-to-__sqrt_finite.patch | 205 --- ...-are-now-inline-functions-and-call-o.patch | 384 ...-are-now-inline-functions-and-call-o.patch | 58 -

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] ffmpeg: Fix build on ppc32

2021-12-06 Thread Khem Raj
Fixes | powerpc-yoe-linux/11.2.0/ld: libavformat/libavformat.so: undefined reference to `__atomic_fetch_sub_8' Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- meta/recipes-multimedia/ffmpeg/ffmpeg_4.4.1.bb | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/meta/recipes-multimedia/ffmpeg/ffmpeg_4.4.1.bb

[OE-core] Yocto Project Newcomer & Unassigned Bugs - Help Needed

2021-12-06 Thread Stephen Jolley
All, The triage team is starting to try and collect up and classify bugs which a newcomer to the project would be able to work on in a way which means people can find them. They're being listed on the triage page under the appropriate heading:

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] opkg-utils: upgrade 0.4.5 -> 0.5.0

2021-12-06 Thread Alex Stewart
Patch looks good to me! ACK all. Thanks, -- Alex Stewart Software Engineer - NI Real-Time OS NI (National Instruments) alex.stew...@ni.com -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#159268):

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] opkg: upgrade 0.4.5 -> 0.5.0

2021-12-06 Thread Alex Stewart
You beat me to posting my own recipe upgrade commit. :) Toward the bottom of the opkg_*.bb recipe file is a `package_qa_check_openssl_deprecation` function which I added in the 0.4.5 release to warn BB users when they are building opkg with the openssl options. Could you amend your patchset

[oe-core][PATCH 1/2] repo: Use separate task for patching repo rev

2021-12-06 Thread Jasper Orschulko via lists.openembedded.org
From: Jasper Orschulko Using a task instead of a version specific patch for setting the repo revision within the source code. This drastically decreases the maintenance burden and easier usage of the OE update helper. Signed-off-by: Jasper Orschulko --- .../0001-Set-REPO_REV-to-v2.17.3.patch

[oe-core][PATCH 2/2] repo: upgrade 2.17.3 -> 2.18

2021-12-06 Thread Jasper Orschulko via lists.openembedded.org
From: Jasper Orschulko Signed-off-by: Jasper Orschulko --- meta/recipes-devtools/repo/{repo_2.17.3.bb => repo_2.18.bb} | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) rename meta/recipes-devtools/repo/{repo_2.17.3.bb => repo_2.18.bb} (95%) diff --git

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v2 2/2] vim: set PACKAGECONFIG idiomatically

2021-12-06 Thread Andre McCurdy
On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 10:07 AM Andre McCurdy wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 2:06 AM Richard Purdie > wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2021-12-03 at 01:39 -0800, Andre McCurdy wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 2:33 PM Richard Purdie > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, 2021-11-30 at 13:45 -0800,

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 3/4] oeqa: rename masterimage into goldenimage

2021-12-06 Thread Alexander Kanavin
Nevermind ;) Alex On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 at 16:35, Quentin Schulz wrote: > Golden image has a more explicit meaning than masterimage and is not an > issue wrt inclusivity. > > Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz > --- > .../{masterimage.py => goldenimage.py}| 32 +-- > 1 file

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/4] core: initrdscripts: init-install{-efi,}-testfs.sh: rename masterimage into goldenimage

2021-12-06 Thread Alexander Kanavin
I'd use grep here and (case-insensitively) find all references to masterimage in poky/. It's likely the file and the class can be renamed as well without significant damage. Alex On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 at 16:35, Quentin Schulz wrote: > golden image has a more explicit meaning in addition of not

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] mesa: upgrade 21.3.0 -> 21.3.1

2021-12-06 Thread Alexander Kanavin
Please do not forget mesa-gl recipe as well. Alex On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 at 16:06, zhengruoqin wrote: > Changelog from 21.3.0 > = > Bug fixes: > GPU Crash in Yuzu 6600xt 5.15 > [spirv-fuzz] lower_trivial_continues_block: Assertion

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 26/26] serf: mark patches as inappropriate for upstream submission

2021-12-06 Thread Alexander Kanavin
Thanks - since there's already documented nomenclature for this situation, I tweaked the patch to simply use that. Alex On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 at 17:47, Konrad Weihmann wrote: > To quote the documentation: > >Inappropriate [reason] >- The patch is not appropriate for upstream, include a

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 26/26] serf: mark patches as inappropriate for upstream submission

2021-12-06 Thread Konrad Weihmann
To quote the documentation: Inappropriate [reason] - The patch is not appropriate for upstream, include a brief reason on the same line enclosed with [] reason can be: ... no upstream (the upstream is no longer available -- dead project) so I think this is already

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] minicom: Upgrade 2.7.1 -> 2.8

2021-12-06 Thread Alexander Kanavin
I just sent the proper fix to bitbake-devel :) Alex On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 at 17:41, Konrad Weihmann wrote: > It's of course *not* the file extension, but the .orig. that is > confusing the default upstream regex check > > This here worked for me > > UPSTREAM_CHECK_REGEX =

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] minicom: Upgrade 2.7.1 -> 2.8

2021-12-06 Thread Konrad Weihmann
It's of course *not* the file extension, but the .orig. that is confusing the default upstream regex check This here worked for me UPSTREAM_CHECK_REGEX = "${BPN}_(?P\d+(\.\d+)+)\.orig\..*" but surely it can be fine tuned On 06.12.21 17:30, Konrad Weihmann wrote: I think the answer is that

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 26/26] serf: mark patches as inappropriate for upstream submission

2021-12-06 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2021-12-06 at 16:50 +0100, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > I mean, if you insisit, we can add Upstream-Status: Defunct, but I do not > think keeping patches in Pending state when there is no upstream is right > either. Maybe we should add an Upstream-Inactive status? Cheers, Richard

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] minicom: Upgrade 2.7.1 -> 2.8

2021-12-06 Thread Konrad Weihmann
I think the answer is that latest release is a bz2, while the older one are gzipped http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/m/minicom/minicom_2.7.1.orig.tar.gz vs. http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/m/minicom/minicom_2.8.orig.tar.bz2 On 06.12.21 16:57, Alexander Kanavin wrote: This one is

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 05/26] python3: drop unneeded multiprocessing module patch

2021-12-06 Thread Alexander Kanavin
On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 at 17:13, Khem Raj wrote: > There is a slightly different explanation here. libpthread was merged into > libc > >> so this fix becomes a null-op on glibc. Not sure if musl has a separate >> pthread >> but if so we could/should test that? > > > Musl has always been a single

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 05/26] python3: drop unneeded multiprocessing module patch

2021-12-06 Thread Khem Raj
On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 3:07 AM Richard Purdie < richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Sat, 2021-12-04 at 08:13 +0100, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > > I ran the reproducing sequence on qemux86, and it went fine: > > > > root@qemux86:~# python3 > > Python 3.10.0 (default, Oct 4 2021,

Re: [bitbake-devel] [oe-core][PATCH v5 1/2] repo: Add recipe for 2.17.3

2021-12-06 Thread Jasper Orschulko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 In regards to automatic update patch generation this actually is pretty useful. I think I'll throw an extra patch on top to integrate this suggestion. - -- With best regards Jasper Orschulko DevOps Engineer Tel. +49 30 58 58 14 265 Fax +49 30 58

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] minicom: Upgrade 2.7.1 -> 2.8

2021-12-06 Thread Alexander Kanavin
This one is odd and it should be working. I'll cherry-pick your update and get to the bottom of it. This may mean we are missing other updates that are coming from debian tarballs. Alex On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 at 14:59, Richard Purdie < richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Mon, 2021-12-06

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 26/26] serf: mark patches as inappropriate for upstream submission

2021-12-06 Thread Alexander Kanavin
I mean, if you insisit, we can add Upstream-Status: Defunct, but I do not think keeping patches in Pending state when there is no upstream is right either. Alex On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 at 16:45, Alexander Kanavin via lists.openembedded.org wrote: > On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 at 15:08, Ross Burton wrote: >

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 26/26] serf: mark patches as inappropriate for upstream submission

2021-12-06 Thread Alexander Kanavin
On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 at 15:08, Ross Burton wrote: > On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 at 11:03, Alexander Kanavin > wrote: > > Presumably, that someone would start updating the repo and making > releases, at which point we can reevaluate the situation with the patches. > As of today, they are inappropriate. > >

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/4] rename core-image-testmaster* to core-image-testgolden

2021-12-06 Thread Joshua Watt
On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 9:35 AM Quentin Schulz wrote: > > "golden" has a more explicit meaning than master in addition to not > being an issue wrt inclusivity. I don't think "golden" has the same meaning here. Perhaps "controller" or something similar? > > Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz > --- >

Re: [OE-core] [RFC PATCH] vim: upgrade to 8.2 patch 3752

2021-12-06 Thread Alexander Kanavin
I tend to agree. Vim has a strange release policy where major releases happen infrequently and allow unfixed issues to pile up, but minor releases are tagged for every single commit. And so it becomes hard for integrators to pick an update strategy between those thousands of commits, and even

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/4] blacklist/blocklist and master/golden

2021-12-06 Thread Quentin Schulz
Hi all, It seems some changes are not too invasive and can be made to be a bit more inclusive, so I'll make the autobuilder try those patches and tell me whether I broke something somewhere I wasn't aware of. In other words: I did not test those changes. Those changes warrant some notes in the

[OE-core] [PATCH 4/4] core: udev: udev-extraconf: rename mount.blacklist* to mount.blocklist.*

2021-12-06 Thread Quentin Schulz
blocklist has a more obvious meaning than blacklist and is also not an issue wrt inclusivity, so let's use that naming instead. Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz --- .../initrdscripts/files/init-install-efi-testfs.sh | 2 +- .../initrdscripts/files/init-install-efi.sh| 2 +-

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/4] rename core-image-testmaster* to core-image-testgolden

2021-12-06 Thread Quentin Schulz
"golden" has a more explicit meaning than master in addition to not being an issue wrt inclusivity. Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz --- meta/conf/distro/include/distro_alias.inc | 4 ++-- meta/conf/distro/include/maintainers.inc| 4 ++--

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/4] core: initrdscripts: init-install{-efi,}-testfs.sh: rename masterimage into goldenimage

2021-12-06 Thread Quentin Schulz
golden image has a more explicit meaning in addition of not being an issue wrt inclusivity. Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz --- meta/lib/oeqa/controllers/masterimage.py | 10 +- meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/cases/ssh.py | 4 ++--

[OE-core] [PATCH 3/4] oeqa: rename masterimage into goldenimage

2021-12-06 Thread Quentin Schulz
Golden image has a more explicit meaning than masterimage and is not an issue wrt inclusivity. Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz --- .../{masterimage.py => goldenimage.py}| 32 +-- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) rename

[OE-core] [PATCH] vala: upgrade 0.54.3 -> 0.54.4

2021-12-06 Thread wangmy
Changelog: === * Various improvements and bug fixes: - codegen: + Use CCodeConstant for member access of constant symbol + Emit constants without initializer list in defines section [#440] + Add and use CCodeConstantIdentifier for accessing constants + Check required

[OE-core] [PATCH] xauth: upgrade 1.1 -> 1.1.1

2021-12-06 Thread wangmy
Signed-off-by: Wang Mingyu --- .../recipes-graphics/xorg-app/{xauth_1.1.bb => xauth_1.1.1.bb} | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) rename meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-app/{xauth_1.1.bb => xauth_1.1.1.bb} (75%) diff --git a/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-app/xauth_1.1.bb

[OE-core] [PATCH] sysstat: upgrade 12.4.3 -> 12.4.4

2021-12-06 Thread wangmy
Changelog: === * iostat: Always display persistent names with option -j. * iostat: Fix how device mapper names are taken into account when entered on the command line. * mpstat: Don't display offline CPU. * mpstat: Fix values displayed when an offline CPU goes back online. *

[OE-core] [PATCH] pango: upgrade 1.48.10 -> 1.50.0

2021-12-06 Thread wangmy
Signed-off-by: Wang Mingyu --- .../pango/{pango_1.48.10.bb => pango_1.50.0.bb} | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) rename meta/recipes-graphics/pango/{pango_1.48.10.bb => pango_1.50.0.bb} (94%) diff --git a/meta/recipes-graphics/pango/pango_1.48.10.bb

[OE-core] [PATCH] mesa: upgrade 21.3.0 -> 21.3.1

2021-12-06 Thread zhengruoqin
Changelog from 21.3.0 = Bug fixes: GPU Crash in Yuzu 6600xt 5.15 [spirv-fuzz] lower_trivial_continues_block: Assertion '!first_instr || instr_is_continue(first_instr)' failed. [RADV] Crash in Metro Exodus in Caspain chapter and Sam???s Story

[OE-core] [PATCH] opkg-utils: upgrade 0.4.5 -> 0.5.0

2021-12-06 Thread zhengruoqin
Signed-off-by: Zheng Ruoqin --- .../opkg-utils/{opkg-utils_0.4.5.bb => opkg-utils_0.5.0.bb}| 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) rename meta/recipes-devtools/opkg-utils/{opkg-utils_0.4.5.bb => opkg-utils_0.5.0.bb} (94%) diff --git

[OE-core] [PATCH] lighttpd: upgrade 1.4.61 -> 1.4.63

2021-12-06 Thread zhengruoqin
refresh 0001-Use-pkg-config-for-pcre-dependency-instead-of-config.patch Changelog from 1.4.61: Important changes: support pcre2; HTTP Digest auth userhash bugfixes: [mod_alias] fix use-after-free bug (fixes #3114) [core] clean up fdlog_st and log_error_st

[OE-core] [PATCH] opkg: upgrade 0.4.5 -> 0.5.0

2021-12-06 Thread zhengruoqin
Remove unsupported openssl and option --disable-pathfinder Signed-off-by: Zheng Ruoqin --- meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/{opkg_0.4.5.bb => opkg_0.5.0.bb} | 5 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) rename meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/{opkg_0.4.5.bb => opkg_0.5.0.bb} (92%) diff --git

[OE-core] [PATCH] libsdl2: upgrade 2.0.16 -> 2.0.18

2021-12-06 Thread zhengruoqin
Remove unsupported option "--enable-sdl-dlopen". Changelog: === General: The SDL wiki documentation and development headers are automatically kept in sync Each function has information about in which version of SDL it was introduced SDL-specific CMake options are now

[OE-core] [RFC PATCH] vim: upgrade to 8.2 patch 3752

2021-12-06 Thread Ross Burton
There's a fairly constant flow of CVEs being fixed in Vim, which are getting increasing non-trivial to backport. Instead of trying to backport (and potentially introduce more bugs), or just ignoring them entirely, upgrade vim to the latest patch in the hope that vim 8.3 will be released before we

Re: [OE-core] [RFC PATCH] insane.bbclass: lock down pending patches

2021-12-06 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2021-12-06 at 12:37 +0100, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 at 12:29, Richard Purdie > wrote: > > Ross has a point here. If we go this route we'll just push people to mark > > patches as Inappropriate instead. People will know Pending isn't acceptable > > so > > they'll just

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 26/26] serf: mark patches as inappropriate for upstream submission

2021-12-06 Thread Ross Burton
On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 at 11:03, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > Presumably, that someone would start updating the repo and making releases, > at which point we can reevaluate the situation with the patches. As of today, > they are inappropriate. But how, in two years time, would we know to re-evaluate

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] minicom: Upgrade 2.7.1 -> 2.8

2021-12-06 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2021-12-06 at 14:43 +0100, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > Since AUH didn't pick this up, can you run 'devtool latest-version minicom' > with this update, as it probably would report something that needs fixing via > regexp? That shows: WARNING: latest_versionstring: package

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] minicom: Upgrade 2.7.1 -> 2.8

2021-12-06 Thread Alexander Kanavin
Since AUH didn't pick this up, can you run 'devtool latest-version minicom' with this update, as it probably would report something that needs fixing via regexp? Alex On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 at 14:06, Richard Purdie < richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > * Update the url to use .bz2 instead

[OE-core] [PATCH] minicom: Upgrade 2.7.1 -> 2.8

2021-12-06 Thread Richard Purdie
* Update the url to use .bz2 instead of .gz compression. * Drop three patches merged upstream * Submit two patches upstream * Drop the musl patch since half was already applied upstream and musl now builds fine without the other piece Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie ---

[OE-core] [PATCH] tcf-agent: cleanup patches

2021-12-06 Thread Ross Burton
ldflags.patch isn't really suitable for upstream, so mark inappropriate. fix_ranlib.patch has been rebased into uselessness over time, it's now setting RANLIB to just '$@' which expands to '' when called, so is a null operation. Signed-off-by: Ross Burton ---

[OE-core] [PATCH] minicom: Mark patches as backports

2021-12-06 Thread Richard Purdie
These three patches are backports from upstream, mark as such. Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie --- .../0001-Drop-superfluous-global-variable-definitions.patch | 2 +- .../0002-Drop-superfluous-global-variable-definitions.patch | 2 +-

Re: [OE-core] [RFC PATCH] insane.bbclass: lock down pending patches

2021-12-06 Thread Alexander Kanavin
On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 at 12:29, Richard Purdie < richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > Ross has a point here. If we go this route we'll just push people to mark > patches as Inappropriate instead. People will know Pending isn't > acceptable so > they'll just use Inappropriate and we'll lose

Re: [OE-core] [RFC PATCH] insane.bbclass: lock down pending patches

2021-12-06 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2021-12-06 at 12:21 +0100, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 at 12:15, Alexander Kanavin via lists.openembedded.org > wrote: > > On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 at 11:24, Ross Burton wrote: > > > > > > As much as I hate pending patches, and I really do hate patches that > > > sit in

Re: [OE-core] [RFC PATCH] insane.bbclass: lock down pending patches

2021-12-06 Thread Alexander Kanavin
On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 at 12:15, Alexander Kanavin via lists.openembedded.org wrote: > On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 at 11:24, Ross Burton wrote: > >> >> As much as I hate pending patches, and I really do hate patches that >> sit in pending, there are situations where you know the problem, can >> work around

[OE-core] [PATCH] gcc: Update patch status submitted->backport

2021-12-06 Thread Richard Purdie
Patch was merged to upstream gcc, update status. Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie --- .../gcc/gcc/0012-gcc-Fix-argument-list-too-long-error.patch| 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc/0012-gcc-Fix-argument-list-too-long-error.patch

Re: [OE-core] [RFC PATCH] insane.bbclass: lock down pending patches

2021-12-06 Thread Alexander Kanavin
On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 at 11:24, Ross Burton wrote: > > As much as I hate pending patches, and I really do hate patches that > sit in pending, there are situations where you know the problem, can > work around it, but still want to push it upstream at some point > pending further discussion. >

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 05/26] python3: drop unneeded multiprocessing module patch

2021-12-06 Thread Richard Purdie
On Sat, 2021-12-04 at 08:13 +0100, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > I ran the reproducing sequence on qemux86, and it went fine: > > root@qemux86:~# python3 > Python 3.10.0 (default, Oct 4 2021, 17:55:55) [GCC 11.2.0] on linux > Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 26/26] serf: mark patches as inappropriate for upstream submission

2021-12-06 Thread Alexander Kanavin
On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 at 11:25, Ross Burton wrote: > On Sat, 4 Dec 2021 at 07:13, Alexander Kanavin > wrote: > > -Upstream-Status: Pending > > +Upstream-Status: Inappropriate [last release in 2015, last commit in > 2019] > > If someone picked up Serf maintainership tomorrow, would these patches >

Re: [OE-core] [qa-build-notification] QA notification for completed autobuilder build (yocto-3.4.1.rc1)

2021-12-06 Thread Teoh, Jay Shen
Hello everyone, This is the full report for yocto-3.4.1.rc1: https://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/yocto-testresults-contrib/tree/?h=intel-yocto-testresults === Summary No high milestone defects. new issue found Bug 14622 - bsps-hw.bsps-hw.Test_Seek_bar_and_volume_control

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 3/6] libxkbcommon: allow building of API documentation

2021-12-06 Thread Ross Burton
On Sun, 5 Dec 2021 at 01:24, Peter Kjellerstedt wrote: > > stdio: ERROR: Nothing PROVIDES 'doxygen-native' (but > > /home/pokybuild/yocto-worker/qemux86-world-alt/build/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libxkbcommon_1.3.1.bb, > >

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 26/26] serf: mark patches as inappropriate for upstream submission

2021-12-06 Thread Ross Burton
On Sat, 4 Dec 2021 at 07:13, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > -Upstream-Status: Pending > +Upstream-Status: Inappropriate [last release in 2015, last commit in 2019] If someone picked up Serf maintainership tomorrow, would these patches be suitable upstream? If so, then they're not Inappropriate.

Re: [OE-core] [RFC PATCH] insane.bbclass: lock down pending patches

2021-12-06 Thread Ross Burton
On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 at 08:36, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > Misuse of 'Pending' patch status has been a problem for a long time; > let's disallow that in any newly added patches. Please do the upsream > submission at the same time as you submit the patch to oe-core. As much as I hate pending

[OE-core] [RFC PATCH] insane.bbclass: lock down pending patches

2021-12-06 Thread Alexander Kanavin
Misuse of 'Pending' patch status has been a problem for a long time; let's disallow that in any newly added patches. Please do the upsream submission at the same time as you submit the patch to oe-core. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin --- meta/classes/insane.bbclass | 11 +

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] Build libstd-rs in release mode to compile mozjs

2021-12-06 Thread Alexander Kanavin
On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 at 06:45, pgowda wrote: > When mozjs in firefox is built with DEBUG_BUILD = "1" > in local.conf, it will fail with the following error: >rustc-1.56.0-src/vendor/compiler_builtins/src/int/specialized_div_rem > /asymmetric.rs:57: >more undefined references to

[OE-core] [PATCH 4/4] selftest: devtool: Separate common functions and devtool sstate setup into two classes

2021-12-06 Thread Stefan Herbrechtsmeier
From: Stefan Herbrechtsmeier The selftest recipetool base class reuse the selftest devtool base class. Thereby the selftest devtool base class setup its own devtool sstate and the selftest recipetool classes trigger the build of recipes. This leads to the problem that the build artifacts doesn't

[OE-core] [PATCH 3/4] selftest/recipetool: Add tests for branch parameter and srcbranch option

2021-12-06 Thread Stefan Herbrechtsmeier
From: Stefan Herbrechtsmeier The recipetool support two ways to pass a branch and fallback to master if no branch is defined. Add tests for default branch, branch parameter and srcbranch option. Signed-off-by: Stefan Herbrechtsmeier --- This commit changes the test repository from

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/4] selftest/recipetool: Split tests into separate test classes

2021-12-06 Thread Stefan Herbrechtsmeier
From: Stefan Herbrechtsmeier Split tests into separate test classes to speed up individual test runs by reducing the test setup to a minimum. The pkgdata generation is only needed for the append tests and slow down the other tests. Signed-off-by: Stefan Herbrechtsmeier ---

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/4] recipetool: Set master branch only as fallback

2021-12-06 Thread Stefan Herbrechtsmeier
From: Stefan Herbrechtsmeier The commit 'meta/scripts: Manual git url branch additions (dc53fe75cc)' sets the branch= parameter too early to master and thereby breaks the -B/--srcbranch option. ERROR: branch= parameter and -B/--srcbranch option cannot both be specified - use one or the other