Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 09/15] bitbake.conf: move VENDOR variables from bitbake.conf to defaultsetup.conf

2011-05-16 Thread Richard Purdie
On Sat, 2011-05-14 at 18:32 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: > From: Martin Jansa > > * empty TARGET_VENDOR was set before weak assignment in defaultsetup.conf > * -oecore was changed to -oe to be more consistent with SDK_VENDOR as we had > -oesdk as SDK_VENDOR and not -oecoresdk > > Signed-off-by: Mart

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 14/15] task-core-nfs: fix a bitbake error

2011-05-16 Thread Richard Purdie
On Sat, 2011-05-14 at 18:32 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: > From: Nitin A Kamble > > THis fixes following issue: > > NOTE: Runtime target 'glibc-utilsglibc-utils' is unbuildable, removing... > Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: ['glibc-utilsglibc-utils'] > NOTE: Runtime target 'task-core-nfs

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 00/15] 14-May Consolidated Pull

2011-05-16 Thread Richard Purdie
On Sat, 2011-05-14 at 18:32 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: > From: Saul Wold > > Richard, > > Some LSB Fixes from Kang, ARM and MACHINEOVERRIDES tweaks from > Khem, and some glib and defaultsetup changes from Martin. > Along with a QT4 Update from Paul. > > Pull URL: git://git.openembedded.org/openemb

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 11/15] gcc-common.inc: Consider hardfp knob for configuring toolchain

2011-05-16 Thread Richard Purdie
Hi Khem, I've a concern about ending up with several different variables all doing the same thing. Why do we need both TARGET_FPU and ARM_FP_ABI? Couldn't we just have values or "hard, sort or empty" for TARGET_FPU? Cheers, Richard On Sat, 2011-05-14 at 18:32 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: > From: Khe

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] cmake: add support for oe qt4 tools names

2011-05-16 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 15:36 +, Otavio Salvador wrote: > The FindQt4 module looks for Qt4 binaries to be able to gather the > paths used for compilation and also to be using during other processes > (translation update, translation binary generating and like) however > OpenEmbedded has renamed t

Re: [OE-core] [RFC 0/3] Move Old Recipes to meta-extras

2011-05-16 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 10:08 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 7:57 AM, Saul Wold wrote: > > On 05/15/2011 11:19 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > >> > >> > >> On May 14, 2011, at 5:23 PM, Saul Wold wrote: > >> > >>> From: Saul Wold > >>> > >>> This proposes to move the YAFFS2-utils, older clut

Re: [OE-core] LIC_FILES_CHKSUM fatal?

2011-05-16 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 17:24 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > This change, from commit d2d5456cd3b3bd3e52a5dedccca4d46e3a7986d1: > > diff --git a/meta/classes/insane.bbclass b/meta/classes/insane.bbclass > index 225530a..71ed5b6 100644 > --- a/meta/classes/insane.bbclass > +++ b/meta/classes/insane.bb

Re: [OE-core] sstate breakage with multimachine

2011-05-16 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 13:20 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > This bug gets reintroduced every other week, so let's try to fix it > properly this time. The situation: > > 2 machines (beagleboard, pandaboard) using the same base architecture > (armv7a). > > step 0: rm build pseudone -rf > step 1: MACHINE=

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 04/14] xserver-kdrive: upgrade from 1.7.99.2 to 1.10.1

2011-05-16 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 14:44 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: > From: Yu Ke > > - remove the patches > * xserver-kdrive-1.3.0.0/*: no longer used > * disable-xf86-dga-xorgcfg.patch: no longer used > * nodolt.patch: already in upstream > * enable-xcalibrate.patch: it is invalid now, because XCALIBRA

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] tclibc-uclibc.inc: Append -uclibc only to target recipes

2011-05-16 Thread Richard Purdie
On Sun, 2011-05-15 at 23:04 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > Do not define DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE > Append -uclibc to STAGING_DIR_TARGET only for target recipe and cross > recipes > Append -uclibc to STAGING_DIR_HOST only for target recipes. > > These changes make sure that we still share the native sysroot >

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] tclibc-uclibc.inc: Append -uclibc only to target recipes

2011-05-17 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 10:17 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 01:13 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > > The more I looked at that patch, the more holes I could see in what we > > were doing (and what Angstrom currently does). I started playing around > > with

Re: [OE-core] sstate breakage with multimachine

2011-05-17 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 08:34 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > Thanks for looking into this! For the time being I'll work around it with: > > oen@dominion:/OE/tentacle/sources/meta-angstrom$ git diff conf/distro/ > diff --git a/conf/distro/include/angstrom-core-tweaks.inc > b/conf/distro/include/angstrom-

Re: [OE-core] sstate breakage with multimachine

2011-05-17 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 09:14 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > there is also another source of many sstate rebuilds. I've discuessed > this with RP on IRC already and I'll fill bugs as recommended, sharing > here just because you have opened this topic. > > If you have package with > PACKAGE_ARCH = "all

[OE-core] [RFC PATCH] distro/defaultsetup.conf: Append TCLIBC to TMPDIR by default

2011-05-17 Thread Richard Purdie
to the core with other approaches to this problem inevitably entail, usually in code where this abstraction isn;'t logically best placed. Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie diff --git a/meta/conf/distro/defaultsetup.conf b/meta/conf/distro/defaultsetup.conf index 8da6c0a..e7636b4 100644 --- a

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] license bbclass: put licenses in DEPLOY_DIR/licenses to avoid sstate problems when MACHINE is part of DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE

2011-05-17 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 11:47 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > See > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2011-May/002535.html > for more info. > > Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi > --- > meta/classes/license.bbclass |2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --g

[OE-core] OE-Core repo broken again

2011-05-17 Thread Richard Purdie
Hi Guys, Something is broken with the oe-core repository as I can't push to it: $ git push origin master:master Counting objects: 9, done. Delta compression using up to 2 threads. Compressing objects: 100% (5/5), done. Writing objects: 100% (5/5), 628 bytes, done. Total 5 (delta 4), reused 0 (del

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] image-prelink: remove hardcoded reference to /usr/sbin

2011-05-17 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 12:51 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > --- > meta/classes/image-prelink.bbclass |2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/meta/classes/image-prelink.bbclass > b/meta/classes/image-prelink.bbclass > index ee0951c..cefd983 100644 > --- a/meta

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 00/14] 16-May-2011 Consolidated Pull Request

2011-05-17 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 14:43 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: > This contains the Kernel updates, Upstream-Status updates along with > some changes from Nitin, Khem, Tom and myself. > > > Pull URL: git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib > Branch: sgw/stage > Browse: > http://git.openembe

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] image.bbclass: use soft assignment for LDCONFIGDEPEND

2011-05-17 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 13:31 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > This allows distros that don't want ldconfig to turn it off. > > Signed-off-by: Phil Blundell > --- > meta/classes/image.bbclass |2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/meta/classes/image.bbclass b/

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] openssl: backport fix for empty prefix from oe master

2011-05-17 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 13:35 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > This fixes a build failure when ${prefix}="". > > Signed-off-by: Phil Blundell > --- > meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl.inc |6 +- > 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) Applied, thanks (when I can push to th

Re: [OE-core] [patch] update-rc.d: point SRC_URI to new devel repo

2011-05-17 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 13:28 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > handhelds.org cvs is down and doesn't seem to be coming back. > update-rc.d now has a new upstream home, point SRC_URI to that. > > Signed-off-by: Phil Blundell > --- > meta/recipes-core/update-rc.d/update-rc.d_0.7.bb |5 ++--- > 1 fi

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] image.bbclass: use soft assignment for LDCONFIGDEPEND

2011-05-17 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 14:57 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > Op 17 mei 2011, om 14:31 heeft Phil Blundell het volgende geschreven: > > > This allows distros that don't want ldconfig to turn it off. > > > > Signed-off-by: Phil Blundell > > --- > > meta/classes/image.bbclass |2 +- > > 1 files changed

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] eglibc: backport fix from oe master to stop libc.so leaking into ${PN}

2011-05-17 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 14:20 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > Signed-off-by: Phil Blundell > --- > meta/recipes-core/eglibc/eglibc-package.inc|2 +- > 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/eglibc/eglibc/lds-warnings.patch Merged to mast

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] Upstream-Status: Update for some GPLv2 patch, edwin, May17, 2011

2011-05-17 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 21:36 +0800, Zhai Edwin wrote: > From: Zhai Edwin > > Saul, > Upstream-Status for some GPLv2 patches including gzip and mtools. > > Thanks, > edwin > > Pull URL: git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib.git > Branch: gzhai/fix3 > Browse: http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.c

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] guilt-native: eliminate hardcoded "/usr" in do_install

2011-05-17 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 11:34 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > For some reason guilt-native seems to have gone out of its way to refer > explicitly to /usr, which breaks on micro. > Let's use ${prefix} instead. > > --- > meta/recipes-devtools/guilt/guilt-native_0.33.bb |2 +- > 1 files changed,

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] update patch upstreaming status

2011-05-17 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 18:05 +0800, Qing He wrote: > From: Qing He > > > Pull URL: git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib.git > Branch: qhe/upstat > Browse: http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=qhe/upstat > > Thanks, > Qing He > --- > > > Qing He (1): > update patch u

Re: [OE-core] [patch] backport USE_LDCONFIG and PACKAGE_SNAP_LIB_SYMLINKS from oe master

2011-05-17 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 10:56 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > This is a backport of the corresponding package.bbclass functionality > (which is needed by micro) from the openembedded tree. > > p. > > From 01e01d38d57d7c766cc1e9a547c73abd4065e1c1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Phil Blundell > Date

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] Pull request for TARGET_VENDOR fix

2011-05-17 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 08:22 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > Pull URL: git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib > Branch: jansa/pull > Browse: > http://git.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=jansa/pull > > Thanks, > Martin Jansa > --- > > > Martin Jansa

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] rootfs_ipk: respect ONLINE_PACKAGE_MANAGEMENT

2011-05-17 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 14:55 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > This makes it work more or less the same way as the current tip of oe > master, except that I didn't copy over the behaviour for O_P_M="add" > because it seemed slightly bogus to me. > > Signed-off-by: Phil Blundell > --- > meta/classes

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] tclibc-uclibc.inc: Append -uclibc only to target recipes

2011-05-17 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 10:44 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 10:34 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > > How about this idea: > > > > TMPDIR_append = "-uclibc" > > Hm, I'm not totally sure what this really buys us. > > If the whol

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v2] image-prelink: remove hardcoded path assumptions

2011-05-17 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 15:17 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > Signed-off-by: Phil Blundell > --- > meta/classes/image-prelink.bbclass | 13 + > 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/meta/classes/image-prelink.bbclass > b/meta/classes/image-prelink.bbclass >

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v2] image-prelink: remove hardcoded path assumptions

2011-05-17 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 15:47 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 15:35 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > > The patch description and what it does don't quite match (the rm is > > removed and options are added to prelink). > > The added "-c .

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v3] image-prelink: remove hardcoded path assumptions, don't generate cache file

2011-05-17 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 16:52 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > Pass -N option to prelink so that no cache file is generated (obviates need > for deleting it afterwards). > Use symbolic names, ${sysconfdir} et al., rather than hardcoded paths. > Pass explicit -c option to prelink in case ${sysconfdir}

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] rootfs_ipk: respect ONLINE_PACKAGE_MANAGEMENT

2011-05-17 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 15:50 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 15:24 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > > What's wrong with: > > > > ROOTFS_POSTPROCESS_COMMAND += "remove_packaging_data_files ; " > > > > as used in the minimal i

Re: [OE-core] [RFC][v2] [PATCH 1/1] package-index.bb: add support for deb and rpm.

2011-05-17 Thread Richard Purdie
Hi Dexuan, When I read Saul's original emails I thought this approach would work although it wasn't the first one that came to my mind. Looking at the code you have, the problem is you have nowhere you can call the "addtask" for the individual tasks and we don't want to the overhead system wide f

Re: [OE-core] OE-Core repo broken again

2011-05-17 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 09:56 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 4:11 AM, Richard Purdie > wrote: > > Hi Guys, > > > > Something is broken with the oe-core repository as I can't push to it: > > > > $ git push origin master:master > > C

Re: [OE-core] [RFC 0/3] Move Old Recipes to meta-extras

2011-05-17 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 15:34 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Saul Wold wrote: > > On 05/16/2011 12:51 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 10:08 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > >>> > >>> On Mon, May 16, 201

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] update-rc.d: fix after repo move

2011-05-17 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 20:36 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > The git repo layout is different from the cvs repo layout > > Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi > --- > meta/recipes-core/update-rc.d/update-rc.d_0.7.bb |4 ++-- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-cor

Re: [OE-core] sstate breakage with multimachine

2011-05-17 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 13:37 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 10:42:52AM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 09:14 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > > > there is also another source of many sstate rebuilds. I've discuessed > > > this

Re: [OE-core] [RFC PATCH] u-boot: remove UBOOT_MACHINE and COMPATIBLE_MACHINES

2011-05-17 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 16:00 -0700, Darren Hart wrote: > oe-core does not define any machines, so it does not make sense to > add machine specific information in the oe-core u-boot recipe and > infrastructure. > > Since every machine wishing to use the u-boot recipe would need to add itself > to >

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] tclibc-uclibc.inc: Append -uclibc only to target recipes

2011-05-18 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 00:49 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > I think we need to globalize libc variable like MACHINE or MULTIMACHINE > and we could check if PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/libc == TCLIBC or not > in base.bbclass for sanity. Something like attached patch might be > able to do it Having assessed

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] tclibc-uclibc.inc: Append -uclibc only to target recipes

2011-05-18 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 10:48 +0200, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > 2011/5/18 Richard Purdie > > > On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 00:49 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > > I think we need to globalize libc variable like MACHINE or MULTIMACHINE > > > and we could check if PREFERRED_PROV

Re: [OE-core] [RFC PATCH] u-boot: remove UBOOT_MACHINE and COMPATIBLE_MACHINES

2011-05-18 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 16:37 -0700, Darren Hart wrote: > > On 05/17/2011 04:15 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 16:00 -0700, Darren Hart wrote: > >> oe-core does not define any machines, so it does not make sense to > >> add machine specific inf

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 00/15] 18-May-2011 Consolidated Pull

2011-05-18 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 01:17 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: > This requests includes the removal of clutter, yaffs and older > gcc version, along with the GCC 4.6 Update for x86 and arm. > > There is the start of the meta-skeleton layer, which I believe > we want to be part of oe-core for solid examples t

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/3] Qt4 cleanup

2011-05-18 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 10:08 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: > From: Paul Eggleton > > Remove Qt 4.6.3 in favour of 4.7.3 (which should be binary compatible with > 4.6.x), add Upstream-Status to remaining patches and re-enable some patches > that were missed with the original upgrade to 4.7.x. > > Pu

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] default-distrovars.inc, task-core-boot.bb: Create distro overridable varibales

2011-05-18 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 20:15 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > Op 18 mei 2011, om 20:07 heeft Khem Raj het volgende geschreven: > > there are certain common parts that can be abstracted > > and can be maintained in oe-core so everyone benefits > > from it and certain image specific parts can be done in > >

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] rootfs_ipk: respect ONLINE_PACKAGE_MANAGEMENT

2011-05-19 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 16:37 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 17:22 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 15:50 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > > > I guess I could teach remove_packaging_data_files() to not create the > > > empty directo

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] rootfs_ipk: respect ONLINE_PACKAGE_MANAGEMENT

2011-05-19 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 11:31 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 11:15 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > > We have postinstalls that require to run on the target device. If > > they're present, we need opkg there to run them, or at least some kind > > of s

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/5] network based PR service

2011-05-19 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 13:01 +0200, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > What should I do to either disable this for some recipes, or use a > different (private) server? > We do not wish to rely on an external server for proprietary recipes (or for > recipes for which we made a local change in an overlay). >

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/5] network based PR service

2011-05-19 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 12:54 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > Op 19 mei 2011, om 12:29 heeft Lianhao Lu het volgende geschreven: > > > From: Lianhao Lu > > > > This series of 5 patches implemented the network based PR service and > > enabled > > the poky to use it during the task do_package and do_pac

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/5] conf/bitbake.conf: Added variables for PR service.

2011-05-19 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 18:29 +0800, Lianhao Lu wrote: > From: Lianhao Lu > > 1. change BB_SIGNATURE_HANDLER from basic to basichash. > > 2. Added following variables for PR service: > USE_PR_SERV: flag of whether to use the network PR service > PRFORMAT: format of revision to be used in tasks pac

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 3/5] classes/package(prserv).bbclass: Added PR service support.

2011-05-19 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 18:29 +0800, Lianhao Lu wrote: > From: Lianhao Lu > > 1. Added package_get_auto_rev to PACKAGEFUNCS to get the auto > incremented value(PRAUTO) from remote PR service. > > 2. Save PRFORMAT to pkgdata to be used by package_write_xxx. > > 3. Added supporting functions in prs

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/5] network based PR service

2011-05-19 Thread Richard Purdie
This patch series looks really good to me in general. I know I've given feedback about some pieces that need tweaking but overall its good and I'm pleased with this. There are a few corner cases people have raised and some tweaks we need to make but nothing that can't be built from this foundation!

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/5] network based PR service

2011-05-19 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 13:51 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > Op 19 mei 2011, om 13:38 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven: > > > On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 12:54 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > >> Op 19 mei 2011, om 12:29 heeft Lianhao Lu het volgende geschreven: > &g

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] rootfs_ipk: respect ONLINE_PACKAGE_MANAGEMENT

2011-05-19 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 12:41 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 12:21 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 11:31 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > > Agreed. I'd like to raise one other issue which is the number of > > variables we need to

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/5] network based PR service

2011-05-19 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 14:02 +0200, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > 2011/5/19 Richard Purdie > > > On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 13:01 +0200, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > > > What should I do to either disable this for some recipes, or use a > > > different (private) server? >

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/5] network based PR service

2011-05-19 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 14:43 +0200, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > 2011/5/19 Richard Purdie > > > On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 14:02 +0200, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > > > 2011/5/19 Richard Purdie > > > > > > > On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 13:01 +0200, Frans Meulen

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] utils.bbclass: fix for create_wrapper

2011-05-19 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 11:57 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: > From: Saul Wold > > > Pull URL: git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib.git > Branch: sgw/patch > Browse: http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=sgw/patch > > Thanks, > Saul Wold > --- > > > Saul Wold (1): > utils.bb

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] rootfs_ipk: respect ONLINE_PACKAGE_MANAGEMENT

2011-05-19 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 16:04 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 13:16 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > > So if we: > > > > a) Only add ROOTFS_PKGMANAGE_BOOTSTRAP if postinstalls were present > > b) Add the read-only-rootfs option we discussed which errors

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] Let opkg-build allow uppercase letters

2011-05-19 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 14:09 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > Majority of the changes are backported from OE > one additional patch is to opkg-utils/opkg-build to allow > uppercase letters. Upperspace package names are a violation of debian packaging guidelines (which OE has aimed to roughly follow) and wi

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] opkg: Synchronise with OE

2011-05-19 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 14:09 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > Remove use of IMAGE_ROOTFS which was making sstage to install > ${IMAGE_ROOTFS}/${sysconfdir}/rcS.d into the dir where it was > built first time. So if you moved the tmpdir it would still > create this directory in old tmpdir and anyway its not n

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 08/30] package-index.bb: add support for deb and rpm.

2011-05-19 Thread Richard Purdie
Hi, We're nearly there with this, I'd like just one other tweak please: On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 12:19 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: > diff --git a/meta/classes/package_deb.bbclass > b/meta/classes/package_deb.bbclass > index 4faeb4a..f9ef32c 100644 > --- a/meta/classes/package_deb.bbclass > +++ b/meta/c

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 00/30] 18-May-2011 Consolidated Pull

2011-05-19 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 12:19 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: > This has a few core fixes to master for broken builds, utils.bbclass > address the perl failure and qt4-tools-native address a qt4 failure. > > Additional this has Darren's new create/send pull request along with > fixes for 4.6 and libc overri

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 5/6] conf/distro/include/default-distrovars.inc: Create set of default 'distro' variable values

2011-05-19 Thread Richard Purdie
On Sun, 2011-05-15 at 13:48 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > +++ b/meta/conf/distro/include/default-distrovars.inc > > @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@ > > +DISTRO_EXTRA_RDEPENDS += "task-core-boot" > > +DISTRO_EXTRA_RRECOMMENDS += "kernel-module-af-packet" > > + > > > others can be overridden but the above two are a

Re: [OE-core] Is BBCLASSEXTEND in .bbappend supposed to work?

2011-05-19 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 21:47 +0200, Simon Busch wrote: > On 18.04.2011 14:17, Gary Thomas wrote: > > On 04/18/2011 05:34 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: > >> > >> Op 18 apr 2011, om 13:28 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven: > >> > >>> On Mon, 2011-04-1

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/3] distcc_2.18.3.bb: Fix compilation on uclibc

2011-05-19 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 19:29 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > We enable gtk/gnome in distcc that code uses loadavg() > a function unimplemented in uclibc. Therefore for uclibc > we disable gnome and gtk+ features in distcc > > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj > --- > meta/recipes-devtools/distcc/distcc_2.18.3.bb

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 00/12] 20-May-2011 Consolidated Pull

2011-05-20 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 00:06 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: > This is building green on x86 and ARM. > > This contains updated pull requests from Khem and Dexuan. I have some > non-gplv3 fixes along with a fix to the u-boot patch due to a bad checksum. > > I have again included the gcc 4.6 enabler for x

Re: [OE-core] Is BBCLASSEXTEND in .bbappend supposed to work?

2011-05-20 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 05:33 -0600, Gary Thomas wrote: > On 05/19/2011 04:53 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 21:47 +0200, Simon Busch wrote: > >> > >> I discoverd the same behaviour today. Is there already something fix to > >> get bitbake

Re: [OE-core] [PATCHv2 1/2] opkg_svn.bb: Install rcS.d into ${D} instead of ${IMAGE_ROOTFS}

2011-05-20 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 16:52 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > Remove headerfix.patch, its already applied upstream > > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj > --- > meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/headerfix.patch | 19 --- > meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg_svn.bb |3 +-- > 2 files change

Re: [OE-core] [PATCHv2 2/3] distcc_2.18.3.bb: Fix compilation on uclibc

2011-05-20 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 17:02 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > We enable gtk/gnome in distcc that code uses loadavg() > a function unimplemented in uclibc. Therefore for uclibc > we disable gnome and gtk+ features in distcc > > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj > --- > meta/recipes-devtools/distcc/distcc_2.18.3.bb

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] opkg-utils: Allow uppercase lettlers in package names

2011-05-20 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 18:05 +0200, Andreas Oberritter wrote: > On 05/20/2011 05:01 PM, Phil Blundell wrote: > > On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 07:45 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > >> On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 14:09 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > >>> Some packages have uppercase letters in their names e.g. > >>> efikam

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/5] Variable typing & reworked imports handling

2011-05-20 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 14:02 -0700, Chris Larson wrote: > From: Chris Larson > > Pull URL: git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib > Branch: kergoth/oe-sync-base > Browse: > http://git.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=kergoth/oe-sync-base > > Thanks, >

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 4/5] image.bbclass: switch to OE's IMAGE_FEATURES

2011-05-20 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 14:06 -0700, Chris Larson wrote: > From: Chris Larson > > Currently, all image features are assumed to be package groups defined with > oe.packagegroup (PACKAGE_GROUP_ = ""). > > Signed-off-by: Chris Larson > --- > meta/classes/core-image.bbclass | 112 > ++-

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 4/5] image.bbclass: switch to OE's IMAGE_FEATURES

2011-05-20 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 11:09 -0700, Chris Larson wrote: > On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Richard Purdie > wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 14:06 -0700, Chris Larson wrote: > >> From: Chris Larson > >> > >> Currently, all image features are as

Re: [OE-core] [PATCHv2 1/2] opkg_svn.bb: Install rcS.d into ${D} instead of ${IMAGE_ROOTFS}

2011-05-20 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 11:28 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 4:49 AM, Richard Purdie > wrote: > > > > This needs to be $D, I didn't miss the brackets in my previous email :) > > > > > > but that wont be relative right ? it will encode cur

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] distcc_2.18.3.bb: Fix compilation on uclibc

2011-05-20 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 16:19 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > We enable gtk/gnome in distcc that code uses loadavg() > a function unimplemented in uclibc. Therefore for uclibc > we disable gnome and gtk+ features in distcc > > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj > --- > meta/recipes-devtools/distcc/distcc_2.18.3.bb

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 3/8] puzzles: update to r9173

2011-05-23 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 13:03 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Sat, 2011-05-21 at 11:37 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Saul Wold > > --- > > .../puzzles/{puzzles_r9163.bb => puzzles_r9173.bb} |0 > > 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > rename meta/recipes-sato/puzz

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/9] UPDATED: 21/22-May 2011 Pull

2011-05-23 Thread Richard Purdie
On Sun, 2011-05-22 at 11:48 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: > This is the updated pull request from the 21st, it contains both > Nitin's and Khem's Updates to their branches for GCC, eglibc along with > distcc & opkg. > > Also included are some fixes for world build issues. > > git://git.openembedded.o

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 4/9] package_rpm.bbclass: create method for createrepo cmd

2011-05-23 Thread Richard Purdie
A couple of comments: Firstly the commit message says what you changed, not why... On Sun, 2011-05-22 at 11:48 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: > Signed-off-by: Saul Wold > --- > meta/classes/package_rpm.bbclass |6 +- > 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/meta/cla

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] qemu machines: drop MACHINE_ESSENTIAL_EXTRA_RDEPENDS = "qemu-config"

2011-05-23 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 13:58 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > Things like 'distcc' and 'bash' are not essential to booting a qemu machine. Agreed, although it largely depends on the context of what you believe the qemu machines are for. Its policy so it belongs in the distro at least so I'll change this b

Re: [OE-core] Unable to push to the repository?

2011-05-23 Thread Richard Purdie
On Sat, 2011-05-07 at 09:51 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Sat, 2011-05-07 at 01:37 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 1:24 AM, Richard Purdie > > wrote: > > > On Sat, 2011-05-07 at 01:21 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > >> On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 1

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] Upgrade uclibc to 0.9.32rc3

2011-05-23 Thread Richard Purdie
On Sun, 2011-05-22 at 16:04 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > This has been in meta-openembedded layer for a while > with this its moving into oe-core > > The following changes since commit a0c3fd1eb23ef22932b938fc124bb17225eb85c4: > > uclibc: Upgrade to 0.9.32-rc3 (2011-05-22 12:02:12 -0700) > > are a

Re: [OE-core] Unable to push to the repository?

2011-05-23 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 11:01 -0400, Cliff Brake wrote: > Its fixed now. The root cause has also been fixed, so I don't expect > this to be a problem in the future. Thanks Cliff! :) Cheers, Richard ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] rootfs_ipk: respect ONLINE_PACKAGE_MANAGEMENT

2011-05-24 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 14:59 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 16:08 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 16:04 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > > > On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 13:16 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > > > > So if we

Re: [OE-core] [RFC][PATCH] bitbake.conf: make OVERRIDES match what people expect

2011-05-24 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 16:04 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > In the current situation TARGET_ARCH will override MACHINE, which is counter > intuitive since the machine is more specific than the arch. > > The order is now pn-$PN} -> arch -> machine -> distro as the machine is a set > of defaults and the

Re: [OE-core] [RFC][PATCH] bitbake.conf: make OVERRIDES match what people expect

2011-05-24 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 16:03 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 15:16 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > > I've been thinking through the different use cases and briefly talked > > with Koen offlist about this. I think the revised order makes sense with > > w

Re: [OE-core] [RFC][PATCH] bitbake.conf: make OVERRIDES match what people expect

2011-05-24 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 16:15 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 16:07 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > > It was added to poky with the intent of doing what "_local" would have > > done before it was broken. > > > > I think its a little saf

Re: [OE-core] [Updated Consolidated Pull 00/19] Updates and 1.1_M1 Targeted Fixes

2011-05-25 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 01:40 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: > General consolidation of patches and updates over the last few > days with testing done. This includes the proposed ROOTFS_SIZE > cleanup, there will be a corresponding push to poky after this is > in. > > Once some of the M1 patches are in, I

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] python-2.6.6: py_package_preprocess should change Makefile only in PKGD not D

2011-05-25 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 14:40 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > * PACKAGEFUNCS ?= "perform_packagecopy \ > ${PACKAGE_PREPROCESS_FUNCS} \ > our py_package_preprocess is called after perform_packagecopy which does > copy D to PKGD > so we change it to target version in D (image/) before

Re: [OE-core] Updating u-boot for oe-core or meta-yocto

2011-05-25 Thread Richard Purdie
I did a little research and I'd like to try and help us move forward. The "problem" at the moment is both oe-core and meta-ti have u-boot recipes. If Yocto were to merge in the meta-ti recipe to meta-yocto it would overshadow the oe-core recipe. I believe Yocto wants to encourage sharing a core on

Re: [OE-core] adding meta-intel layers breaks parsing, was Re: Updating u-boot for oe-core or meta-yocto

2011-05-25 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 13:04 -0700, Darren Hart wrote: > > On 05/25/2011 12:11 PM, Phil Blundell wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 11:56 -0700, Darren Hart wrote: > >> If it is indeed space separated then I should be able to remedy both > >> issues by simply using the append operator and not self-re

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] dbus: split X11 dependant dbus-launch into its own subpackage

2011-05-25 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 22:18 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > This makes dbus usable in non-X enviroments like QT/e > > From the original commit in OE .dev: > > commit 8e25448fb01b6fa6ea3a86f9327f080cd753dfbc > Author: John Lee > Date: Fri Sep 5 11:37:39 2008 + > > dbus: enable x support and

Re: [OE-core] Updating u-boot for oe-core or meta-yocto

2011-05-25 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 09:36 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Richard Purdie > wrote: > > I did a little research and I'd like to try and help us move forward. > > > > The "problem" at the moment is both oe-core and meta-ti have u-b

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] oe-setup-builddir: remove unreachable code, update comments

2011-05-25 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 14:49 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: > On 05/25/2011 10:58 AM, Darren Hart wrote: > > > > > > On 05/24/2011 11:32 PM, Saul Wold wrote: > >> On 05/24/2011 03:31 PM, Darren Hart wrote: > >>> From: Darren Hart > >>> > >>> The following changes since commit > >>> 32a4e746273c3c7d3dd0f13

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] dbus: split X11 dependant dbus-launch into its own subpackage

2011-05-25 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 14:49 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: > On 05/25/2011 02:43 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 22:18 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > >> This makes dbus usable in non-X enviroments like QT/e > >> > >> From the original

Re: [OE-core] RDEPENDS_${PN} and virtclass-native

2011-05-25 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 18:01 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > By way of displacement activity to avoid actually fixing my perl > compilation problem, it occurred to me to investigate why perl was > getting dragged into a micro-base-image build in the first place. The > culprit turns out to be imake, w

Re: [OE-core] RDEPENDS_${PN} and virtclass-native

2011-05-25 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 00:02 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > I think we need to fix native.bbclass. I dread to think what this is > doing to the dependency tree at present. We did remove most references > to RDEPENDS directly so I think that makes this a high priority to fix. > > I&

Re: [OE-core] RDEPENDS_${PN} and virtclass-native

2011-05-25 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 17:11 -0700, Chris Larson wrote: > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 5:00 PM, Richard Purdie > wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 00:02 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > >> I think we need to fix native.bbclass. I dread to think what this is > >> doing to the

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/3] dbus: split X11 dependant dbus-launch into its own subpackage

2011-05-26 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 11:00 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > This makes dbus usable in non-X enviroments like QT/e > > From the original commit in OE .dev: > > commit 8e25448fb01b6fa6ea3a86f9327f080cd753dfbc > Author: John Lee > Date: Fri Sep 5 11:37:39 2008 + > > dbus: enable x support and

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] dbus 1.4.1: enable systemd support, but package systemd files seperately

2011-05-26 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 11:09 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > Systemd support in dbus only affects 'make install', so no changes for > sysvinit based systems > > Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi Merged to master, thanks. Richard ___ Openembedded-core mailing list

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >