Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 00/60] krogoth-next staged

On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 00:02:21 -0400 akuster808 <akuster...@gmail.com> wrote > > > On 09/24/2016 07:48 AM, Ian Geiser wrote: > > I think the systemd change may have broken something. It looks like it is > > running a useradd with no arguments oth

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 00/60] krogoth-next staged

I think the systemd change may have broken something. It looks like it is running a useradd with no arguments other than the root. Now I see the following error in krogoth: from "tmp-glibc/work/i586-oe-linux/systemd/1_229+gitAUTOINC+714c62b463-r0/temp/log.do_install" DEBUG: SITE files

Re: [OE-core] Cannot build any external kernel modules in krogoth

ame issue (fixed only in > master):https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9352 > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 8:38 PM, Ian Geiser <geis...@geekcentral.pub> wrote: > > On Tue, 30 Aug 2016 10:13:52 -0400 Ian Geiser > <geis...@geekcentral.pub&g

Re: [OE-core] Cannot build any external kernel modules in krogoth

On Tue, 30 Aug 2016 10:13:52 -0400 Ian Geiser <geis...@geekcentral.pub> wrote > Greetings, I have an issue where I cannot seem to build any external kernel > module recipes. The one in particular is iscsitarget, but it seems none of > them build now.

[OE-core] Cannot build any external kernel modules in krogoth

Greetings, I have an issue where I cannot seem to build any external kernel module recipes. The one in particular is iscsitarget, but it seems none of them build now. It seems that what is happening is that the "work-shared/*/kernel-build-artifacts" is getting erased right before the module

Re: [OE-core] Wic and "live" images

On Wed, 25 May 2016 16:04:50 -0400 Christopher Larson wrote > > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 4:35 AM, Ed Bartosh > wrote: > > It's debatable. As long as we keep the logic separated, such that anything > bsp specific is in the

Re: [OE-core] Wic and "live" images

On Tue, 24 May 2016 15:56:39 -0400 Christopher Larson wrote > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:51 PM, Ed Bartosh > wrote: > > The thing is, it's likely the machine/bsp setting the WKS_FILE, yet in > OE/yocto we prefer

Re: [OE-core] Wic and "live" images

On Tue, 24 May 2016 15:51:45 -0400 Ed Bartosh <ed.bart...@linux.intel.com> wrote > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 08:13:28AM -0400, Ian Geiser wrote: > > > On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 05:52:45AM -0400, Ian Geiser wrote: [...snip...] > How about creating reci

Re: [OE-core] Wic and "live" images

had with image-vm.bbclass or wic. > > Kind regards, > Jin > > > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 08:13:28AM -0400, Ian Geiser wrote: > > On Mon, 23 May 2016 06:36:23 -0400 Ed Bartosh > > <ed.bart...@linux.intel.com> wrote > >

Re: [OE-core] Wic and "live" images

On Mon, 23 May 2016 06:36:23 -0400 Ed Bartosh <ed.bart...@linux.intel.com> wrote > On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 05:52:45AM -0400, Ian Geiser wrote: > > Greetings, I am trying to learn "wic" and have been confused as how to > > create a "live"

[OE-core] Wic and "live" images

Greetings, I am trying to learn "wic" and have been confused as how to create a "live" style image. I am following "http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/1.5.2/dev-manual/dev-manual.html#creating-partitioned-images; but am getting confused on the target to use to create the a file system that has

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v2] Allow different filesystems to be used for VM images.

What is the status of this patch? On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 08:41:49 -0400 Ian Reinhart Geiser wrote > This allows for things like btrfs to be used vs just ext4. > The default value of ext4 is kept so there is no functional > change unless VM_ROOTFS_TYPE is

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] Allow different filesystems to be used for VM images.

On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 04:19:00 -0400 Richard Purdie wrote > On Thu, 2016-04-28 at 15:21 -0400, Ian Reinhart Geiser wrote: > > This allows for things like btrfs to be used vs just ext4. > > The default value of ext4 is kept so there is no

Re: [OE-core] debugedit: canonicalization unexpectedly shrank by one character

-Original Message- From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org [mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of Martin Jansa Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 3:20 AM To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: [OE-core] debugedit:

[OE-core] state of systemd in oe

Hey, I noticed that systemd service files are going back into the oe-core layer and not always compatible with meta-oe. What is the official policy on systemd right now? Is it supposed to be confined to the meta-oe/meta-systemd layer? Or what cases will they be pulled in and/or duplicated in

[OE-core] OpenGL as a DISTRO_FEATURE

Greetings, I maintain 3 different platforms with varying degrees of GL support. Would it make more sense to migrate the opengl distro feature to MACHINE_FEATURES? This way we could compensate for the platforms that use Mesa and the ones that use their custom implementations? Thoughts?

Re: [OE-core] OpenGL as a DISTRO_FEATURE

-Original Message- From: Ross Burton [mailto:ross.bur...@intel.com] Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2013 2:04 PM To: Ian Geiser Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [OE-core] OpenGL as a DISTRO_FEATURE On Sunday, 3 February 2013 at 17:15, Ian Geiser wrote

Re: [OE-core] OpenGL as a DISTRO_FEATURE

as a DISTRO_FEATURE W dniu 03.02.2013 20:45, Ian Geiser pisze: The case I have is 3 platforms: 1) Atom N450 2) WM 8950 3) VIA VX900 The Atom has the normal mesa-dri drivers and can use the OpenGL implementation from that. The WM has only OpenGLES drivers and no OpenGL implementation. So

Re: [OE-core] OpenGL as a DISTRO_FEATURE

-Original Message- From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org [mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of Ross Burton Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2013 6:35 PM To: Marcin Juszkiewicz Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re:

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 17/17] directfb: Explictly disable mesa

-Original Message- From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org [mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of Richard Purdie Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 9:01 AM To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: [OE-core] [PATCH 17/17]

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 17/17] directfb: Explictly disable mesa

-Original Message- From: Burton, Ross [mailto:ross.bur...@intel.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 9:53 AM To: Ian Geiser Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 17/17] directfb: Explictly disable mesa On 30 January 2013 14:43, Ian Geiser

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] mesa-dri: add extra dri drivers

-Original Message- From: Burton, Ross [mailto:ross.bur...@intel.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 10:16 AM To: Ian Geiser Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] mesa-dri: add extra dri drivers On 30 January 2013 13:26, igei...@devonit.com