Re: [OE-core] [PATCH RESEND] bitbake.conf: do not let DISTROOVERRIDES fall back to empty string

On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 5:13 PM Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Sat, 2020-04-25 at 14:37 -0700, Andre McCurdy wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 8:38 AM Richard Purdie > > wrote: > > > On Sun, 2020-04-26 at 00:19 +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > > > diff --g

[OE-core] [PATCH RESEND] bitbake.conf: do not let DISTROOVERRIDES fall back to empty string

back to the original simple definition. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada --- meta/conf/bitbake.conf | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/meta/conf/bitbake.conf b/meta/conf/bitbake.conf index 4b544a22cd..eb3dd0007e 100644 --- a/meta/conf/bitbake.conf +++ b/me

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] bitbake.conf: do not let DISTROOVERRIDES fall back to empty string

Hi. On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 9:37 PM Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > Commit abacd7243a2e ("bitbake.conf: fix distro-less failure expanding > FILESPATH") mended the littered DISROOVERRIDES when DISTRO is unset. > > Some time later, commit b7279f996397 ("bitbake.conf

Re: [OE-core] Question about the behavior and intent of recrdeptask

On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 5:45 PM Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Wed, 2020-01-08 at 12:14 +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > So, the concept of "recursive dependency" sounds > > somewhat odd to me. > > > > I guess I am missing important use-cases. >

[OE-core] [PATCH] bitbake.conf: fix suspicious comparison with ('' or 'custom')

be: d.getVar('TARGET_OS', d, 1) == '' or d.getVar('TARGET_OS', d, 1) == 'custom' Or, more simply: d.getVar('TARGET_OS', d, 1) in ('', 'custom') I guess this is probably the intended behavior. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada --- meta/conf/bitbake.conf | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2