Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] oeqa/runtime: Added 4 new runtime test cases
On 07/08/2015 11:17 PM, Daniel Istrate wrote: bash:(240) check bash in image connman: (223) Only one connmand in background (963) test connmand file rpm: (195) Check rpm install/removal log file size Signed-off-by: Daniel Istrate daniel.alexandrux.istr...@intel.com --- meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/bash.py| 23 +++ meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/connman.py | 40 meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/rpm.py | 37 + 3 files changed, 100 insertions(+) create mode 100644 meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/bash.py diff --git a/meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/bash.py b/meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/bash.py new file mode 100644 index 000..2a261a3 --- /dev/null +++ b/meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/bash.py @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +from oeqa.oetest import oeRuntimeTest +from oeqa.utils.decorators import * + + +class BashTest(oeRuntimeTest): + +@testcase(240) +@skipUnlessPassed(test_ssh) +def test_check_bash_in_image(self): + +Summary: check bash in image +Expected:bash command should exist in image +Product: BSPs +Author: Alexandru Georgescu alexandru.c.george...@intel.com +AutomatedBy: Daniel Istrate daniel.alexandrux.istr...@intel.com + + +cmd = 'which bash' +expected_ret = '/bin/bash' + +(status, output) = self.target.run(cmd) +self.assertEqual(0, status, 'Failed to send cmd {}'.format(cmd)) +self.assertEqual(str(output), expected_ret, 'Found {}, instead of {}'.format(output, expected_ret)) diff --git a/meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/connman.py b/meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/connman.py index cc537f7..70ead4e 100644 --- a/meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/connman.py +++ b/meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/connman.py @@ -28,3 +28,43 @@ class ConnmanTest(oeRuntimeTest): if status != 0: print self.service_status(connman) self.fail(No connmand process running) + +@testcase(223) +def test_only_one_connmand_in_background(self): + +Summary: Only one connmand in background +Expected:There will be only one connmand instance in background. +Product: BSPs +Author: Alexandru Georgescu alexandru.c.george...@intel.com +AutomatedBy: Daniel Istrate daniel.alexandrux.istr...@intel.com + + +# Make sure that 'connmand' is running in background +(status, output) = self.target.run(oeRuntimeTest.pscmd + ' | grep [c]onnmand') +self.assertEqual(0, status, 'Failed to find connmand process running in background.') + +# Start a new instance of 'connmand' +(status, output) = self.target.run('connmand') +self.assertEqual(0, status, 'Failed to start a new connmand process.') + +# Make sure that only one 'connmand' is running in background +(status, output) = self.target.run(oeRuntimeTest.pscmd + ' | grep [c]onnmand | wc -l') +self.assertEqual(0, status, 'Failed to find connmand process running in background.') +self.assertEqual(1, int(output), 'Found {} connmand processes running, expected 1.'.format(output)) + +@testcase(963) +def test_connmand_file(self): + +Summary: test connmand file +Expected:connman-applet should be ELF32 binary +Product: BSPs +Author: Lucian Musat georgex.l.mu...@intel.com +AutomatedBy: Daniel Istrate daniel.alexandrux.istr...@intel.com + + +cmd = readelf -h /usr/bin/connman-applet | sed -n '3p' | awk '{print $2}' +expected_ret = 'ELF32' + +(status, output) = self.target.run(cmd) +self.assertEqual(0, status, 'Failed to send cmd {}'.format(cmd)) +self.assertEqual(expected_ret, str(output), Expected {}, found instead {}.format(expected_ret, output)) https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/main/builders/nightly-arm64/builds/50/steps/Running%20Sanity%20Tests/logs/stdio Please look at the above failure. Regards, Chen Qi diff --git a/meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/rpm.py b/meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/rpm.py index 4ca193b..32aae24 100644 --- a/meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/rpm.py +++ b/meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/rpm.py @@ -58,6 +58,43 @@ class RpmInstallRemoveTest(oeRuntimeTest): (status, output) = self.target.run('sudo -u test1 rpm -qa') self.assertEqual(status, 0, msg=status: %s. Cannot run rpm -qa % status) +@testcase(195) +@skipUnlessPassed('test_rpm_install') +def test_check_rpm_install_removal_log_file_size(self): + +Summary: Check rpm install/removal log file size +Expected:There should be some method to keep rpm log in a small size . +Product: BSPs +Author: Alexandru Georgescu alexandru.c.george...@intel.com +AutomatedBy: Daniel Istrate daniel.alexandrux.istr...@intel.com + +db_files_cmd = 'ls /var/lib/rpm/__db.*' +get_log_size_cmd = du
Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] oeqa/runtime: Added 4 new runtime test cases
On 15 July 2015 at 08:43, ChenQi qi.c...@windriver.com wrote: https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/main/builders/nightly-arm64/builds/50/steps/Running%20Sanity%20Tests/logs/stdio Please look at the above failure. Literally no idea why I ended up merging this into mut, because I knew it would fail. I've just removed it. Daniel, can you please re-submit without the connman test (and get that connman test removed from the test cases). Ross -- ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] oeqa/runtime: Added 4 new runtime test cases
On 8 July 2015 at 16:17, Daniel Istrate daniel.alexandrux.istr...@intel.com wrote: +@testcase(963) +def test_connmand_file(self): + +Summary: test connmand file +Expected:connman-applet should be ELF32 binary +Product: BSPs +Author: Lucian Musat georgex.l.mu...@intel.com +AutomatedBy: Daniel Istrate daniel.alexandrux.istr...@intel.com + What's the point of this test case? Checking a random binary is a 32-bit ELF seems a bit strange, especially as it means it will always fail on a 64-bit machine. Ross -- ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
[OE-core] [PATCH] oeqa/runtime: Added 4 new runtime test cases
bash:(240) check bash in image connman: (223) Only one connmand in background (963) test connmand file rpm: (195) Check rpm install/removal log file size Signed-off-by: Daniel Istrate daniel.alexandrux.istr...@intel.com --- meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/bash.py| 23 +++ meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/connman.py | 40 meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/rpm.py | 37 + 3 files changed, 100 insertions(+) create mode 100644 meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/bash.py diff --git a/meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/bash.py b/meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/bash.py new file mode 100644 index 000..2a261a3 --- /dev/null +++ b/meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/bash.py @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +from oeqa.oetest import oeRuntimeTest +from oeqa.utils.decorators import * + + +class BashTest(oeRuntimeTest): + +@testcase(240) +@skipUnlessPassed(test_ssh) +def test_check_bash_in_image(self): + +Summary: check bash in image +Expected:bash command should exist in image +Product: BSPs +Author: Alexandru Georgescu alexandru.c.george...@intel.com +AutomatedBy: Daniel Istrate daniel.alexandrux.istr...@intel.com + + +cmd = 'which bash' +expected_ret = '/bin/bash' + +(status, output) = self.target.run(cmd) +self.assertEqual(0, status, 'Failed to send cmd {}'.format(cmd)) +self.assertEqual(str(output), expected_ret, 'Found {}, instead of {}'.format(output, expected_ret)) diff --git a/meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/connman.py b/meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/connman.py index cc537f7..70ead4e 100644 --- a/meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/connman.py +++ b/meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/connman.py @@ -28,3 +28,43 @@ class ConnmanTest(oeRuntimeTest): if status != 0: print self.service_status(connman) self.fail(No connmand process running) + +@testcase(223) +def test_only_one_connmand_in_background(self): + +Summary: Only one connmand in background +Expected:There will be only one connmand instance in background. +Product: BSPs +Author: Alexandru Georgescu alexandru.c.george...@intel.com +AutomatedBy: Daniel Istrate daniel.alexandrux.istr...@intel.com + + +# Make sure that 'connmand' is running in background +(status, output) = self.target.run(oeRuntimeTest.pscmd + ' | grep [c]onnmand') +self.assertEqual(0, status, 'Failed to find connmand process running in background.') + +# Start a new instance of 'connmand' +(status, output) = self.target.run('connmand') +self.assertEqual(0, status, 'Failed to start a new connmand process.') + +# Make sure that only one 'connmand' is running in background +(status, output) = self.target.run(oeRuntimeTest.pscmd + ' | grep [c]onnmand | wc -l') +self.assertEqual(0, status, 'Failed to find connmand process running in background.') +self.assertEqual(1, int(output), 'Found {} connmand processes running, expected 1.'.format(output)) + +@testcase(963) +def test_connmand_file(self): + +Summary: test connmand file +Expected:connman-applet should be ELF32 binary +Product: BSPs +Author: Lucian Musat georgex.l.mu...@intel.com +AutomatedBy: Daniel Istrate daniel.alexandrux.istr...@intel.com + + +cmd = readelf -h /usr/bin/connman-applet | sed -n '3p' | awk '{print $2}' +expected_ret = 'ELF32' + +(status, output) = self.target.run(cmd) +self.assertEqual(0, status, 'Failed to send cmd {}'.format(cmd)) +self.assertEqual(expected_ret, str(output), Expected {}, found instead {}.format(expected_ret, output)) diff --git a/meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/rpm.py b/meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/rpm.py index 4ca193b..32aae24 100644 --- a/meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/rpm.py +++ b/meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/rpm.py @@ -58,6 +58,43 @@ class RpmInstallRemoveTest(oeRuntimeTest): (status, output) = self.target.run('sudo -u test1 rpm -qa') self.assertEqual(status, 0, msg=status: %s. Cannot run rpm -qa % status) +@testcase(195) +@skipUnlessPassed('test_rpm_install') +def test_check_rpm_install_removal_log_file_size(self): + +Summary: Check rpm install/removal log file size +Expected:There should be some method to keep rpm log in a small size . +Product: BSPs +Author: Alexandru Georgescu alexandru.c.george...@intel.com +AutomatedBy: Daniel Istrate daniel.alexandrux.istr...@intel.com + +db_files_cmd = 'ls /var/lib/rpm/__db.*' +get_log_size_cmd = du /var/lib/rpm/log/log.* | awk '{print $1}' + +# Make sure that some database files are under /var/lib/rpm as '__db.xxx' +(status, output) = self.target.run(db_files_cmd) +self.assertEqual(0, status, 'Failed to find database files