Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] Revert "musl: Add TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY from glibc"

2019-05-23 Thread Khem Raj
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 9:06 AM Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 07:58:19AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > >... > > Secondly, musl and glibc are under different licenses and importing > > code from one to other could taint it. > >... > > How many LOC are considered the legal limit in OE

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] Revert "musl: Add TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY from glibc"

2019-05-23 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 07:58:19AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: >... > Secondly, musl and glibc are under different licenses and importing > code from one to other could taint it. >... How many LOC are considered the legal limit in OE for that? Many of the musl support patches (e.g. [1]) contain more

[OE-core] [PATCH] Revert "musl: Add TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY from glibc"

2019-05-23 Thread Khem Raj
This reverts commit 0c68c621d3b8690e3a346170006f75b032511a8a. It should be upstreamed first Secondly, musl and glibc are under different licenses and importing code from one to other could taint it. Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- ...0001-unistd.h-Add-TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY.patch | 36