From: Mingli Yu
Add devmem 128-bit support [1].
[1]
https://git.busybox.net/busybox/commit/?id=d432049f288c9acdc4a7caa729c68ceba3c5dca1
Signed-off-by: Mingli Yu
---
.../0001-devmem-add-128-bit-width.patch | 128 ++
meta/recipes-core/busybox/busybox_1.35.0.bb | 1 +
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 09:04:53PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 05:47:03PM -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > I would also ask if we should be enabling more stuff in busybox, period.
>
> I don't think the current status quo would be a good starting point for that.
>
> Before
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 05:47:03PM -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> I would also ask if we should be enabling more stuff in busybox, period.
I don't think the current status quo would be a good starting point for that.
Before submitting I saw CONFIG_PATCH=y, which is a lot more of a
"Why would I ever
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 02:18:06PM -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 12:31 PM Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 08:50:02AM -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 1:34 AM Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > >
> > > > This is a tiny but pretty useful tool.
> > > >
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 11:06:22AM +0100, Philip Balister wrote:
> On 01/30/2019 05:50 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 1:34 AM Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >>
> >> This is a tiny but pretty useful tool.
>
> Also there is http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/recipe/1069/
>
> I was
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 11:16 AM Philip Balister wrote:
>
> On 01/30/2019 09:09 PM, Scott Ellis wrote:
> > Is the busybox devmem functionally different then the standalone devmem2
> > package?
>
> Replying again
>
> I've been told they are functionally different and to use devmem2. I
> think
On 01/30/2019 09:09 PM, Scott Ellis wrote:
> Is the busybox devmem functionally different then the standalone devmem2
> package?
Replying again
I've been told they are functionally different and to use devmem2. I
think the issue with the busybox version is that it does a readback when
On 01/30/2019 05:50 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 1:34 AM Adrian Bunk wrote:
>>
>> This is a tiny but pretty useful tool.
Also there is http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/recipe/1069/
I was told a while ago the busybox version has some issues. Hunting
through brain cells,
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 10:31:58PM +, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-01-30 at 14:18 -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 12:31 PM Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 08:50:02AM -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 1:34 AM Adrian
Hi all,
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 11:32 PM Richard Purdie
wrote:
>
> One reason I'm a little nervous of devmem in busybox is security attack
> surface.
> It is useful so I am torn but its worth keeping this in mind...
>
I agree with this reasoning.
devmem(2) really is a development tool, and
On Wed, 2019-01-30 at 14:18 -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 12:31 PM Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 08:50:02AM -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 1:34 AM Adrian Bunk
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > This is a tiny but pretty useful tool.
> > > >
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 12:31 PM Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 08:50:02AM -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 1:34 AM Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > >
> > > This is a tiny but pretty useful tool.
> > >
> >
> > question is, do we need this enabled in default config, or
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 08:50:02AM -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 1:34 AM Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >
> > This is a tiny but pretty useful tool.
> >
>
> question is, do we need this enabled in default config, or could be add it via
> some DISTRO_FEATURE meant for validation etc. May
Is the busybox devmem functionally different then the standalone devmem2
package?
--
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 11:48 AM Andre McCurdy wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 8:50 AM Khem Raj wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 1:34 AM Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > >
> > > This is a tiny but pretty useful tool.
> >
> > question is, do we need this enabled in default config, or could be add it
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 8:50 AM Khem Raj wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 1:34 AM Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >
> > This is a tiny but pretty useful tool.
>
> question is, do we need this enabled in default config, or could be add it via
> some DISTRO_FEATURE meant for validation etc. May be if you
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 1:34 AM Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> This is a tiny but pretty useful tool.
>
question is, do we need this enabled in default config, or could be add it via
some DISTRO_FEATURE meant for validation etc. May be if you explain your
usecase then we might be able to make a better
This is a tiny but pretty useful tool.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk
---
meta/recipes-core/busybox/busybox/defconfig | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/busybox/busybox/defconfig
b/meta/recipes-core/busybox/busybox/defconfig
index
18 matches
Mail list logo
