On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 1:12 PM, Burton, Ross wrote:
> On 19 August 2015 at 20:59, Nathan Lynch wrote:
>>
>> On 08/19/2015 12:44 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
>> > We redefine LD to point to ld.bfd when building kernel, which works in
>> > most cases since kbuild system calls out for bare LD most of the ti
On 15-08-19 04:12 PM, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 19 August 2015 at 20:59, Nathan Lynch mailto:nathan_ly...@mentor.com>> wrote:
On 08/19/2015 12:44 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
> We redefine LD to point to ld.bfd when building kernel, which works in
> most cases since kbuild system calls out for b
On 19 August 2015 at 20:59, Nathan Lynch wrote:
> On 08/19/2015 12:44 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
> > We redefine LD to point to ld.bfd when building kernel, which works in
> > most cases since kbuild system calls out for bare LD most of the time,
> > however some of newer kernels e.g. 4.1+ have some cod
On 08/19/2015 12:44 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
> We redefine LD to point to ld.bfd when building kernel, which works in
> most cases since kbuild system calls out for bare LD most of the time,
> however some of newer kernels e.g. 4.1+ have some code added which can
> call gcc directly to do the linking jo
We redefine LD to point to ld.bfd when building kernel, which works in
most cases since kbuild system calls out for bare LD most of the time,
however some of newer kernels e.g. 4.1+ have some code added which can
call gcc directly to do the linking job e.g. arm vdso code
This causes build failures
