On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 2:14 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
>
> On 1 April 2017 at 01:42, Khem Raj wrote:
>>
>> Not this case obviously but I was reminded that this should be default
>> option from tool gain if not specified
>
>
> Yes, and it already is.
On 1 April 2017 at 01:42, Khem Raj wrote:
> Not this case obviously but I was reminded that this should be default
> option from tool gain if not specified
>
>>
Yes, and it already is.
Ross
--
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 3:50 PM Richard Purdie <
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-03-31 at 22:27 +, Khem Raj wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 2:29 PM Juro Bystricky > com> wrote:
> > > Build static libraries without the binutils "ar" -U
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 3:27 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 2:29 PM Juro Bystricky
> wrote:
>>
>> Build static libraries without the binutils "ar" -U option.
>> This option deliberately breaks deterministic mode.
>
> While this patch
On Fri, 2017-03-31 at 22:27 +, Khem Raj wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 2:29 PM Juro Bystricky com> wrote:
> > Build static libraries without the binutils "ar" -U option.
> > This option deliberately breaks deterministic mode.
> While this patch is ok it would be
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 2:29 PM Juro Bystricky
wrote:
> Build static libraries without the binutils "ar" -U option.
> This option deliberately breaks deterministic mode.
While this patch is ok it would be better if we configured binutils with
Build static libraries without the binutils "ar" -U option.
This option deliberately breaks deterministic mode.
The option seems to be a relic from 2015, intended as a workaround
for some unspecified build problems.
[YOCTO#11247]
Signed-off-by: Juro Bystricky
---