On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 04:44:54PM +0300, Ed Bartosh wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 08:35:42AM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 02:27:57PM +0300, Ed Bartosh wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 01:44:29PM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 06:47:07PM +0300,
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 08:35:42AM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 02:27:57PM +0300, Ed Bartosh wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 01:44:29PM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 06:47:07PM +0300, Ed Bartosh wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 12:03:27PM -0400,
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 02:27:57PM +0300, Ed Bartosh wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 01:44:29PM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 06:47:07PM +0300, Ed Bartosh wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 12:03:27PM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > > In the case of non-wic images there is
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 01:44:29PM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 06:47:07PM +0300, Ed Bartosh wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 12:03:27PM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > In the case of non-wic images there is logic today to generate a
> > > startup.nsh file that will be executed
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 03:01:13PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 2:59 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 02:57:04PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 2:49 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> >> > On Thu,
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 2:59 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 02:57:04PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 2:49 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>> > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 02:46:23PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> >> Hello Tom,
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 02:57:04PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 2:49 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 02:46:23PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >> Hello Tom,
> >>
> >> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 2:44 PM, Tom Rini
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 2:49 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 02:46:23PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> Hello Tom,
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 2:44 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>> > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 06:47:07PM +0300, Ed Bartosh wrote:
>> >>
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 02:46:23PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Hello Tom,
>
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 2:44 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 06:47:07PM +0300, Ed Bartosh wrote:
> >> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 12:03:27PM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> >> > In the case
Hello Tom,
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 2:44 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 06:47:07PM +0300, Ed Bartosh wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 12:03:27PM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
>> > In the case of non-wic images there is logic today to generate a
>> > startup.nsh file
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 06:47:07PM +0300, Ed Bartosh wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 12:03:27PM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> > In the case of non-wic images there is logic today to generate a
> > startup.nsh file that will be executed by EFI to run the loader that the
> > image contains. In the WIC
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 12:03:27PM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> In the case of non-wic images there is logic today to generate a
> startup.nsh file that will be executed by EFI to run the loader that the
> image contains. In the WIC case is currently depends on that file being
> generated elsewhere
In the case of non-wic images there is logic today to generate a
startup.nsh file that will be executed by EFI to run the loader that the
image contains. In the WIC case is currently depends on that file being
generated elsewhere and placed in DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE and only used if
present there.
13 matches
Mail list logo