Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/6] Correct and improve the ARM tunings

2019-04-17 Thread Peter Kjellerstedt
A32 they want to build for. //Peter From: Martin Jansa Sent: den 17 april 2019 10:33 To: Andre McCurdy Cc: Adrian Bunk ; Peter Kjellerstedt ; OE Core mailing list Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/6] Correct and improve the ARM tunings It's not caused by this change (not the previous

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/6] Correct and improve the ARM tunings

2019-04-17 Thread Martin Jansa
It's not caused by this change (not the previous one I believe), but today I've noticed that aarch64 tunes don't set TUNE_PKGARCH correctly. e.g. with raspberrypi3-64 which since this commit: https://github.com/agherzan/meta-raspberrypi/commit/9cc89cb7341d633b6fc3a92b937b5560d26257a1 uses conf/mac

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/6] Correct and improve the ARM tunings

2019-04-04 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 01:48:04PM -0700, Andre McCurdy wrote: >... > If we let the user pass an arbitrary string to -march then we lose the > ability to determine that (for example) it's safe for a > "armv7athf-vfpv3" machine to pull from a "armv7athf-vfpv3d16" package > feed. For ARM <= v7 this

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/6] Correct and improve the ARM tunings

2019-04-03 Thread Andre McCurdy
On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 1:24 PM Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 12:29:29PM -0700, Andre McCurdy wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 11:23 PM Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 09:26:46PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > > > >... > > > > "armv4t" is defined in the arm tune fi

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/6] Correct and improve the ARM tunings

2019-04-03 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 12:29:29PM -0700, Andre McCurdy wrote: > On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 11:23 PM Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 09:26:46PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > > >... > > > "armv4t" is defined in the arm tune files to mean "add -march=armv4t" > > > which is the convention

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/6] Correct and improve the ARM tunings

2019-04-03 Thread Andre McCurdy
On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 11:23 PM Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 09:26:46PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > >... > > "armv4t" is defined in the arm tune files to mean "add -march=armv4t" > > which is the convention used throughout all the tune files. > >... > > Unfortunately this is not

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/6] Correct and improve the ARM tunings

2019-04-02 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 09:26:46PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: >... > "armv4t" is defined in the arm tune files to mean "add -march=armv4t" > which is the convention used throughout all the tune files. >... Unfortunately this is not true. OE has both armv7a and armv7at tunes. There is no armv7a

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/6] Correct and improve the ARM tunings

2019-04-02 Thread Peter Kjellerstedt
> -Original Message- > From: Richard Purdie > Sent: den 2 april 2019 22:27 > To: Peter Kjellerstedt ; openembedded- > c...@lists.openembedded.org > Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/6] Correct and improve the ARM tunings > > On Tue, 2019-04-02 at 21:30 +0200,

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/6] Correct and improve the ARM tunings

2019-04-02 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2019-04-02 at 21:30 +0200, Peter Kjellerstedt wrote: > These patches are intended to improve the ARM tunings and came about > after I had to study the tune files a lot more than I first had > anticipated... > > The first patch (arch-armv8a.inc: Correct > PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv8a-*)

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/6] Correct and improve the ARM tunings

2019-04-02 Thread Peter Kjellerstedt
These patches are intended to improve the ARM tunings and came about after I had to study the tune files a lot more than I first had anticipated... The first patch (arch-armv8a.inc: Correct PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv8a-*) avoids odd architectures such as "crc" and "crypto" to be included in PAC