A32 they want to build for.
//Peter
From: Martin Jansa
Sent: den 17 april 2019 10:33
To: Andre McCurdy
Cc: Adrian Bunk ; Peter Kjellerstedt
; OE Core mailing list
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/6] Correct and improve the ARM tunings
It's not caused by this change (not the previous
It's not caused by this change (not the previous one I believe), but today
I've noticed that aarch64 tunes don't set TUNE_PKGARCH correctly.
e.g. with raspberrypi3-64 which since this commit:
https://github.com/agherzan/meta-raspberrypi/commit/9cc89cb7341d633b6fc3a92b937b5560d26257a1
uses conf/mac
On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 01:48:04PM -0700, Andre McCurdy wrote:
>...
> If we let the user pass an arbitrary string to -march then we lose the
> ability to determine that (for example) it's safe for a
> "armv7athf-vfpv3" machine to pull from a "armv7athf-vfpv3d16" package
> feed.
For ARM <= v7 this
On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 1:24 PM Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 12:29:29PM -0700, Andre McCurdy wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 11:23 PM Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 09:26:46PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > > >...
> > > > "armv4t" is defined in the arm tune fi
On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 12:29:29PM -0700, Andre McCurdy wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 11:23 PM Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 09:26:46PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > >...
> > > "armv4t" is defined in the arm tune files to mean "add -march=armv4t"
> > > which is the convention
On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 11:23 PM Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 09:26:46PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> >...
> > "armv4t" is defined in the arm tune files to mean "add -march=armv4t"
> > which is the convention used throughout all the tune files.
> >...
>
> Unfortunately this is not
On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 09:26:46PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
>...
> "armv4t" is defined in the arm tune files to mean "add -march=armv4t"
> which is the convention used throughout all the tune files.
>...
Unfortunately this is not true.
OE has both armv7a and armv7at tunes.
There is no armv7a
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Purdie
> Sent: den 2 april 2019 22:27
> To: Peter Kjellerstedt ; openembedded-
> c...@lists.openembedded.org
> Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/6] Correct and improve the ARM tunings
>
> On Tue, 2019-04-02 at 21:30 +0200,
On Tue, 2019-04-02 at 21:30 +0200, Peter Kjellerstedt wrote:
> These patches are intended to improve the ARM tunings and came about
> after I had to study the tune files a lot more than I first had
> anticipated...
>
> The first patch (arch-armv8a.inc: Correct
> PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv8a-*)
These patches are intended to improve the ARM tunings and came about
after I had to study the tune files a lot more than I first had
anticipated...
The first patch (arch-armv8a.inc: Correct
PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-armv8a-*) avoids odd architectures such as
"crc" and "crypto" to be included in PAC
10 matches
Mail list logo