[OE-core] [PATCH 0/9] linux-yocto: consolidated pull request

2024-03-19 Thread Bruce Ashfield
From: Bruce Ashfield Richard, This took longer than I wanted but here ar the next set of linux-yocto updates. We have -stable, config tweaks (in particular genericarm64) and a fix for the beaglebone-yocto graphics issue. Rather than sending the yocto-bsp update separately, I included it in

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/9] linux-yocto: consolidated pull request

2022-03-04 Thread Bruce Ashfield
From: Bruce Ashfield Richard, Here's the next round of -stable and configuration updates for 5.10 and 5.15. Nothing significant here, I've been soaking them for a while, hopefully the AB agrees with my "it's green" assesment! Cheers, Bruce The following changes since commit

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/9] linux-yocto: consolidated pull request

2019-05-31 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 1:07 PM wrote: > > On Fri, 2019-05-31 at 09:46 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 9:22 AM > > wrote: > > > On Fri, 2019-05-31 at 08:53 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > > > On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 4:01 AM < > > > > richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org>

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/9] linux-yocto: consolidated pull request

2019-05-31 Thread richard . purdie
On Fri, 2019-05-31 at 09:46 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 9:22 AM > wrote: > > On Fri, 2019-05-31 at 08:53 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > > On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 4:01 AM < > > > richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> > > > wrote: > > > > This fails in testing with one

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/9] linux-yocto: consolidated pull request

2019-05-31 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 9:22 AM wrote: > > On Fri, 2019-05-31 at 08:53 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 4:01 AM > > wrote: > > > > > > This fails in testing with one failure on qemuarm: > > > > > > > bugger, I didn't expect that! > > > > I'll dig up how I mocked up a

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/9] linux-yocto: consolidated pull request

2019-05-31 Thread richard . purdie
On Fri, 2019-05-31 at 08:53 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 4:01 AM > wrote: > > > > This fails in testing with one failure on qemuarm: > > > > bugger, I didn't expect that! > > I'll dig up how I mocked up a systemtap test environment before (it > will be next week

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/9] linux-yocto: consolidated pull request

2019-05-31 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 4:01 AM wrote: > > Hi Bruce, > > On Thu, 2019-05-30 at 08:44 -0400, bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com wrote: > > Here's the latest round of -stable and -dev bumps for linux-yocto. > > Looking at > > the timing, v5.2 could be the new reference kernel introduced in the > > next > >

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/9] linux-yocto: consolidated pull request

2019-05-31 Thread richard . purdie
Hi Bruce, On Thu, 2019-05-30 at 08:44 -0400, bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com wrote: > Here's the latest round of -stable and -dev bumps for linux-yocto. > Looking at > the timing, v5.2 could be the new reference kernel introduced in the > next > release, so I gave it some extra test cycles while doing

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/9] linux-yocto: consolidated pull request

2019-05-30 Thread bruce . ashfield
From: Bruce Ashfield Hi all, Here's the latest round of -stable and -dev bumps for linux-yocto. Looking at the timing, v5.2 could be the new reference kernel introduced in the next release, so I gave it some extra test cycles while doing this update. Also note that I updated 4.9, 4.4 and other

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/9] linux-yocto: consolidated pull request

2017-12-21 Thread Bruce Ashfield
Here is my current queue of linux-yocto* patches. Some are repeats from previous sends, but are included for completeness sake. I have some other changes to send, but given that I'm out of the office for the next week and a half, I'll hold on those workflow changes until I'm back to normal hours.

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/9] linux-yocto: consolidated pull request

2016-07-12 Thread Bruce Ashfield
Hi all, I hand't heard if there were any issues with these in any test branches, but to be safe, I'm batching up all my pending commits and sending them as a consolidated series. These commits represent mainline backports (largely for intel platform support), -stable integrations asn well as

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/9] linux-yocto: consolidated pull request

2016-03-30 Thread Bruce Ashfield
Hi all, This series is largely a collection of mainline backports to add support for Borxton/Apollo Lake. I've kept the commit separate on purpose, since we need the SRCREV granularity to bisect if there are any issues. The changes have cleanly cherry-picked, are mainline and have passed my

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/9] linux-yocto: consolidated pull request

2012-06-08 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 15:59 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: Richard/Saul, Here's a 9 patch series that is a collection of work that's been brewing for about three weeks. Highlights include: - removal of the 2.6.37 recipe, it's time is now gone - addition of the 3.4 kernel recipe

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/9] linux-yocto: consolidated pull request

2012-06-07 Thread Bruce Ashfield
Richard/Saul, Here's a 9 patch series that is a collection of work that's been brewing for about three weeks. Highlights include: - removal of the 2.6.37 recipe, it's time is now gone - addition of the 3.4 kernel recipe - configuration fixups and audits within that 3.4 kernel -