Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 02/16] slang: Fix namespace conflict vis-a-vis posix_close

2015-09-10 Thread Trevor Woerner
On 09/10/15 07:21, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > On 09/09/2015 07:02 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > >> So I encourage you to formulate a policy and make a proposal to >> community and get everyone on board in changing >> the policy OE wide. > > > Actually, first we need some kind of tool that keeps track of

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 02/16] slang: Fix namespace conflict vis-a-vis posix_close

2015-09-10 Thread Alexander Kanavin
On 09/09/2015 07:02 PM, Khem Raj wrote: So I encourage you to formulate a policy and make a proposal to community and get everyone on board in changing the policy OE wide. Actually, first we need some kind of tool that keeps track of custom patches and their upstream-statuses and minimizes

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 02/16] slang: Fix namespace conflict vis-a-vis posix_close

2015-09-10 Thread Burton, Ross
On 10 September 2015 at 12:50, Trevor Woerner wrote: > With so many maintainers on so many different layers/etc we would need > some sort of billboard somewhere listing the names of people currently > on the "naughty" list ;-) > I prefer the concept of a naughty list to

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 02/16] slang: Fix namespace conflict vis-a-vis posix_close

2015-09-09 Thread alexander . kanavin
>> +Exposed while compiling on musl >> + >> +Signed-off-by: Khem Raj >> +--- >> +Upstream-Status: Pending > > If this has been submitted upstream (as you say in the cover letter for > this patchset), please provide a link for the submission in the > upstream-status. We can't

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 02/16] slang: Fix namespace conflict vis-a-vis posix_close

2015-09-09 Thread alexander . kanavin
> +Exposed while compiling on musl > + > +Signed-off-by: Khem Raj > +--- > +Upstream-Status: Pending If this has been submitted upstream (as you say in the cover letter for this patchset), please provide a link for the submission in the upstream-status. We can't afford to let

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 02/16] slang: Fix namespace conflict vis-a-vis posix_close

2015-09-09 Thread Khem Raj
> On Sep 9, 2015, at 3:23 AM, alexander.kana...@linux.intel.com wrote: > >>> +Exposed while compiling on musl >>> + >>> +Signed-off-by: Khem Raj >>> +--- >>> +Upstream-Status: Pending >> >> If this has been submitted upstream (as you say in the cover letter for >> this

[OE-core] [PATCH 02/16] slang: Fix namespace conflict vis-a-vis posix_close

2015-09-08 Thread Khem Raj
Fixes errors like | /home/ubuntu/work/oe/openembedded-core/build/tmp-musl/work/core2-64-oe-linux-musl/slang/2.2.4-r12/slang-2.2.4/src/slpo sio.c:366:12: error: conflicting types for 'posix_close' | static int posix_close (SLFile_FD_Type *f) | ^ | In file included from